1) not same calibre, but underpowered .22LR
2) it has no parts interchangeability
3) completely different action
4) only similarities are cosmetic.
Than why it is proibited ?Maybe there is something else which does not allow this rifle to jump from "prohib" to "non-restr" ?
You know what... maybe this shouldn't be dropped.
This is something we could clearly win on if enough political pressure was put on the government. No legislation is required, its done by OIC's, so if the government decided they could simply issue an OIC and PRESTO it would be unrestricted.
Its an easy case to make:
1) not same calibre, but underpowered .22LR
2) it has no parts interchangeability
3) completely different action
4) only similarities are cosmetic.
This is a case which could be won.
Don't contact the mounties. They'll stonewall you, and you'll go nowhere fast. Call and write your MP. Call and write Stockwell Day. Make some noise. Your MP isn't due back in Ottawa for a bit. He/she will have some time for sit-down meetings the next few days.
This is an opportunity for our new government to show the common sense they said they'd have. Besides that, they need to remind their hirelings that the government makes legislation. The police enforce it. That's how it works in a feckin' democracy.