H&R 1871 Buffalo Classic 45-70 - First shots!

prosper

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
EE Expired
Rating - 100%
100   0   0
Location
Edmonton
So, I bought a new gun last week. A 45-70, from Harrington Richardson. :D
HR_Buffalo_Classic_45-70-small.jpg

This is a single-shot break action rifle, modelled after the original Frank Wesson rifles of 1860. It has a medium heavy 32" barrel, and weighs 8lbs. It comes with a Williams rear peep sight, and a Lyman #17 front hooded globe sight. This rifle uses the NEF SB2 action, also used for such high-intensity cartridges as the 308 winchester, at over 60000psi.

Given that the action was OK for very high pressures, and the experiences of the guys over at the graybeardoutdoors forums, I knew this was safe with the stout levergun and even ruger #1 loads published for the 45-70. I was planning on shooting cast, so I figured it'd be best if I shot heavier weights so as to limit the velocity, to prevent leading. I found a box of bullet barn 405 gr bullets at P&D, which I bought. I e-mailed bullet barn to see if the could offer any guidance as to how I should load these, and they responded that they had had no problems loading to ~1650fps in a micro-grooved Marlin guide gun. OK, cool, I figured I would use load data for about that speed, and suspected I'd gain another hundred fps or so given the 32" barrel on my gun vs the 18.5" barrel on the guide gun. Guys have loaded up to 2100fps in this gun over on the other forums, so I was well within operating limits aiming at 1750.

I looked through my powder cabinet, and selected some surplus WC-735 powder as the most suitable powder on hand. This powder is supposedly in the neighbourhood of H335, maybe 5% faster. The information that I had suggested that I approach the minimum 335 loads as the maximum for this powder. Most sources quote 52 grains 335 as the minimum 'lever-gun' load for 335, at about 1600fps with the 405 gr bullets (with an 18.5" barrel). As I was targeting 1750 fps with a slightly faster powder and a longer barrel, I loaded a few at 50.0 grains, 51.0 grains and 52.0 grains. I seated the bullets just off the lands, which ended up being quite far out of the case, nowhere the cannelure for the crimp. This is a single shot gun, so I didn't bother crimping.

This load was based on a number of guesses upon guesses, and I had no idea what to expect from these loads. I'd estimated somewhere between 1500fps - because I'd seated the bullets so far out, I'd increased the capacity of the cartridge quite a bit, and thought the pressures might be quite low - and 2000fps. In any case, I wasn't worried that the loads were unsafe.

I took the rifle and the loads with me today as I was headin out shootin gophers. I also happened to have my chrony with me, more by co-incidence than design. I was somewhat apprehensive of recoil - the buttplate is just a sheet of steel fastened to the end of the stock. I fired off a quick shot to see, and was surprised how manageable the kick actually was - I suspected that my loads were indeed on the low end of the spectrum. The primer on the spent casing looked perfect - (very) slight flattening, perhaps - like you get on pretty much any cartridge. Stepping up to the 52gr loads, more flattening is observable, but still not anywhere into the danger zone. The flattening at this point resembles typical medium-hot factory loads for most cartridges.

I unpacked the chrony and set it up on a fencepost, and aimed over it into a hill on the other side. I touched off a round, and looked down at the screen. 1958fps!!! Damn, that CAN'T be right. BOOM! Shot 2. 1927fps. Damn! This thing was putting out just under 3500fpe of muzzle energy! I decided that was enough, and did not chrony the 51 and 52gr loads. Having heard how hard these stout 45-70 loads can hit you, I'd expected a lot worse recoil. Folks on the graybeard forums are talking about putting lead-filled pipes into the stocks, or mercury recoil suppressors in to tame the recoil on this 8lb gun and its nasty steel buttplate. I had no problems at all with it (shooting offhand.)

Anyway, I figure that the 32" barrel contributes to the higher speeds, especially when coupled with the slightly slower burning WC-735 (most 45-70 loads seem to favour 3031, 4198, and the like). Further, I strongly suspect that the 735 surplus is a very progressive-burning powder, which also allows it to capitalize on the long barrel, and maintain a flatter pressure curve. I also noticed a slight black colour in the smoke cloud when I shot, unlike the faint gray colour typical of smokeless powders. I suspect that WC-735 also has some sort of anti-fouling agent in it, or maybe a flash suppressant, neither of which would be uncommon in mil-spec powder. After the 5 shots I put through it in total, I see zero leading - as expected from these extremely hard cast bullets and their high-speed lube.

I look forward to shooting this beauty at the range; maybe tomorrow. I'll keep y'all posted.
 
Last edited:
This is a good example why you start low and work up. I fully expected this load to be 1500-1600 fps, and maybe up to 1750 by the time I got to the 52gr ones. (I'd thought that maybe, on the outside, they might be up to 2000, but that was deemed acceptable as it was still within known tolerances for this gun)

The loads ended up a LOT hotter than expected, so it's good I didn't start heavier.
 
I have shot one of these rifles with black and cast, and thoroughly enjoyed it.
The rifle is fine handling, holds well, and is bloddy accurate!!
The one I shot had a Lyman peep on it.
Cat
 
I have been thinking about trying a few BP loads in it.

One of the guys over on graybeard's has his chambered in 45-120 :eek:
 
top end reloads in the 45/70

There is a feller (Bob Mitchell..13 Orchard Dr. RR1 Lindsey Ont.) who publishes a journal on top end 45/70 loads in the NEF, Ruger #1, and Marlin'95.......He has tested more heavy loads for vel. and accuracy than most would use in a lifetime. He settled on three powders and three bullets after all was said and done. These components showed best accuracy, penetration, velocity.....powders? AA2015, Reloder #7, H-335.....Bullets? Rem.405 gr., Chambers cast 475gr. Fl. Pt. Gas ck., Hornady 500 gr. Round Nose......The 500gr. round nose was not used in the Marlin as it could not be crimped.....All bullets weighing under 400 grs. were omitted because in penetration tests they just wouldn't cut it! He had accurate arms pressure test the loads, and while they stopped short of endorsing some of them they were within the same pres. range as the 450 Marlin. (Legal concerns re: the trapdoor springfield saga). He also lists the taylor knock out values for these "screamers" and they surpass .375 H &H or 416 loads. With the NEF and the Marlin he safely reached 1825 fps.for the former and 1920 fps for the latter.(NEF had 22" barrel) with 465 gr. cast bullet (all safely!!)
 
I got one back in March, I think, and I was amazed at the paper accuracy of the thing. At 50 metres with the iron sights and 300 gr Winchester factory HP, I was able to put three shots into a nice clover leaf -- it measured 0.563" centre to centre. Very pleased, for sure.

The reason you have not noticed the recoil was too bad is because you only shot 5 rounds, and none of them were benched. I too shot my first 5 rounds off hand, and found it pleasant to shoot. The next time I took it out, I was bench shooting over the screens, and shot 15 rounds. That was enough. Next day, I had a bruise on my shoulder. Of course, just prior to that I cranked 10 off the bench from my 405 Winchester Ruger #1 as well. The Winchester 300 gr factory loads ran 1855 fps.

I shot one through three steel oil drums at a remote dump, and when it hit the fourth one, it dented it to the point that the steel cracked, but the bullet did not penetrate. It had shed its jacket at that point. I don't know ho wthick the wall on the oil drums was, but that was 6 and a half pieces of steel, say close to 1/16" each. Not bad, IMHO.

I did some plinking the other day with some 350 gr Hornady's loaded with RL7, and was able to smoke a plastic juice bottle every shot at 50 yards or so. Too much fun! Almost as much fun as the 405 with 41 mag pistol bullets and AA5744 powder. If I'd known retirement was this much fun . . . . . . . .
 
Oh, I'm sure I'll be feeling it after a few strings from the bench.

I really don't want to be running quite as hot as I am - no leading so far, but this is a lot faster than these cast bullets are really designed to move. I'd heard that long barrels can be quite prone to leading as the friction gets to the melting point of lead near the end of the barrel.

I was planning on using the 405's a mid-powered 'plinker' load, so I'll load some up at 46.0 and 48.0 grains, and put them over the chrony. For the heavy loads I'll cast some 500 grainers on my own, gas check them and use a nice moly lube.
 
Keep me posted if you find a load that you can drive tacks with. I love the accuracy of that rifle, and it has a not bad trigger - for the price.
 
Has anyone tried the 2 Lee 500gn cast bullets they make moulds for.
One is a flatpoint gaschecked pill and the other is spitzer shaped, standard base and has a significantly higher ballistic coefficient.
Tell, me can our put a gas check on a bullet not designed for one or is it unecessary?
 
kombi1976 said:
Has anyone tried the 2 Lee 500gn cast bullets they make moulds for.
One is a flatpoint gaschecked pill and the other is spitzer shaped, standard base and has a significantly higher ballistic coefficient.
Tell, me can our put a gas check on a bullet not designed for one or is it unecessary?
I use the 500 grain bullets, no gas check, just a base wad or a grease cookie, and over powder wad of beeswax
Cat
 
Well, 46.0 grains of WC-735 gets me 1850fps - still more than I really want. Think I'll try some 40.0 42.0 and 44.0 loads, and see where I'm at... After the 20 or so shots I've put through it so far, leading is starting to become evident in the last 4" of the barrel or so; this underscores the need to find a good load with these cast bullets. I also bought a few hundred Remington 405gr jacketed and a few hundred Remington 300gr jacketed - I need to spend some serious time at the range with this puppy, but shootin gophers has taken priority of my weekends these days...
 
For real shootin' pleasure try: M.T. Chambers' 555gr. creedmore bullet with a case full of Swiss 1 1/2 fg. powder, or his 590gr. Paper patch bullet. These are the type of bullet used in the orig. buffalo guns....I don't know if that sight has enough travel for long range shooting ....as those bullets allow??
 
MT Chambers' Supply e-mail: mtchambers@skvelocity.ca......not your average cast bullets...want a hammer for your Marlin? 8 dif designs for .458 including Long range B.P. Bullets cast 30-1 in any dia. you want! Need a paper patch bullet? designs in .38,.458, .50 cal,tapered designs? Need a hollow pt. for your 45/70?Need Bp lube, veg.fibre wads,buy from someone who casts or tests bullets every day, besides he's my Bro!!!
 
kombi1976 said:
Has anyone tried the 2 Lee 500gn cast bullets they make moulds for.
One is a flatpoint gaschecked pill and the other is spitzer shaped, standard base and has a significantly higher ballistic coefficient.
Tell, me can our put a gas check on a bullet not designed for one or is it unecessary?
I use the 500 grain Smitchzer style bulet in my 45/70's Kombi ( among others)
and really like it.

I also have shot 50 of the 500 grain Postell style bullets, they have a slightly rounder nose.
I think they shoot slightly better in my 45/70 with the Badger barrel.
Cat
 
I was out at the range today with my 1895SS in 45-70 shooting 3" groups of 4 (sounds crappy on the surface, but consider these were 405gr factory Remmy's, to 100yds with open sights... lookout Bullwinkle!). Another lad was there with the same H&R 45-70 single shot shooting 300gr out to 200 yards admirably... it was the first time he had the rifle out. His only complaint was the metal buttplate. That, and how the gun jerked the whole bench backward with every round.

Have fun with your H&R.
 
Back
Top Bottom