Gentleman,
Sometime ago, I met a guy at a lower mainland rifle range and got to talking.....2 weeks later I was watching a Match at the Volkes Range in Chilliwack. When the shoot was done, one of the competitors let me send a couple of 308 rounds down the 600 meter range. Since that day, I knew I had been bitten by the long range bug.
To date I've got myself set up with an LTR/Mark 4 and in the past 2 months have been fumbling away with the first few batches of handloads with relatively good success.
I generally shoot 5 shot groups and measure 4 of 5 rounds.....I am not a benchrest shooter and I feel that with my inexperience I should get at least one mulligan for each batch
....for now anyway.
Here are my results.
168 gr SMK with Varget my best batches ranged from .417" to .832"
175 gr SMK with Varget: .667" to .902"
155 gr HPBT with Varget (Palma Match: 2155) .657" to .782"
**with a few groups over an inch**
I was pleased with the 168's so I loaded up another batch and shot 4 rounds into 1.55" at 300 yards.....not so bad I think....
Moving along....I then put a 5 shot group out to 500 yards that measured 6.26"
A second 5 shot group of 175 SMK's at 500 measured 8.00"
This was a bit concerning as these loads were always performing sub-MOA at close range and suddenly they opened up a fair bit.....of course, there was some wind messing about so maybe that was impacting my shooting as well
Now its on to bigger and better things...IE. mid-long range....I want to get out to 6-800 yards.
I've been reading about how at longer ranges, slower bullets will begin to tumble or otherwise lose thier ballistic edge. Therefore, I would assume that I need something moving at high speed to get anywhere near a Minute at 6-800 yards. My reloading data thus far shows that my LTR shoots the SMK's better at the lowest (near minimum) powder charge: Rookie Translation: my gun shoots tighter groups with slower bullets!!!!. I don't have a chrono so I don't know what velocities I'm achieveing, however, I'm going to speculate that I won't have the speed to keep my bullets stabilized at longer ranges.....right or wrong??
My questions to the pros is this; what are the pros/cons to shooting 155, 168 or 175 match bullets past the 600 yard mark? Which is likely to preform better? Do I want a fast light bullet or heavier slower bullet? Will there be a major difference from one gun to the next?
Secondly, is it possible to have a load shoot excellent at close to mid range and not so good at 500+ and then have another round shoot WAY better at long range than close?
Help a wanna-be out.
lap
BTW: specs on the rifle are:
LTR with Timney trigger (thanks Mystic)
Nightforce 1 piece 20moa base
Nightforce rings
Leupold Mark 4 PR 4.5-14
Aside from the trigger the rifle hasn't been touched
Sometime ago, I met a guy at a lower mainland rifle range and got to talking.....2 weeks later I was watching a Match at the Volkes Range in Chilliwack. When the shoot was done, one of the competitors let me send a couple of 308 rounds down the 600 meter range. Since that day, I knew I had been bitten by the long range bug.
To date I've got myself set up with an LTR/Mark 4 and in the past 2 months have been fumbling away with the first few batches of handloads with relatively good success.
I generally shoot 5 shot groups and measure 4 of 5 rounds.....I am not a benchrest shooter and I feel that with my inexperience I should get at least one mulligan for each batch
Here are my results.
168 gr SMK with Varget my best batches ranged from .417" to .832"
175 gr SMK with Varget: .667" to .902"
155 gr HPBT with Varget (Palma Match: 2155) .657" to .782"
**with a few groups over an inch**
I was pleased with the 168's so I loaded up another batch and shot 4 rounds into 1.55" at 300 yards.....not so bad I think....
Moving along....I then put a 5 shot group out to 500 yards that measured 6.26"
A second 5 shot group of 175 SMK's at 500 measured 8.00"
This was a bit concerning as these loads were always performing sub-MOA at close range and suddenly they opened up a fair bit.....of course, there was some wind messing about so maybe that was impacting my shooting as well
Now its on to bigger and better things...IE. mid-long range....I want to get out to 6-800 yards.
I've been reading about how at longer ranges, slower bullets will begin to tumble or otherwise lose thier ballistic edge. Therefore, I would assume that I need something moving at high speed to get anywhere near a Minute at 6-800 yards. My reloading data thus far shows that my LTR shoots the SMK's better at the lowest (near minimum) powder charge: Rookie Translation: my gun shoots tighter groups with slower bullets!!!!. I don't have a chrono so I don't know what velocities I'm achieveing, however, I'm going to speculate that I won't have the speed to keep my bullets stabilized at longer ranges.....right or wrong??
My questions to the pros is this; what are the pros/cons to shooting 155, 168 or 175 match bullets past the 600 yard mark? Which is likely to preform better? Do I want a fast light bullet or heavier slower bullet? Will there be a major difference from one gun to the next?
Secondly, is it possible to have a load shoot excellent at close to mid range and not so good at 500+ and then have another round shoot WAY better at long range than close?
Help a wanna-be out.
lap
BTW: specs on the rifle are:
LTR with Timney trigger (thanks Mystic)
Nightforce 1 piece 20moa base
Nightforce rings
Leupold Mark 4 PR 4.5-14
Aside from the trigger the rifle hasn't been touched

