hi everyone,
so after purchasing so many handguns and shotguns... i finally feel like its time
to get my first ar/m4 rifle.
i am trying to do my own research, but i always got the right answer/answers every time
i asked for help on this forum so i hope you guys can do it again for me.
so i am looking at;
daniel defense
bushmaster
core 15
those are the major 3 i am looking at and my price is around 1000 to 1500. now from what i understand,
people are saying that all models(base models for example all the way up to the higher end models) have the
same lower and top receivers... what makes them exceptionally different from each other is the bells and whistles
added on the frame... is this true? in which case, i am thinking of buying the lower end model and then upgrading
from that point.
it seems core 15 has the lowest price model, and from an aesthetic point, it looks alright... but i never shot one
and don't know how well it shoots(or should shoot compared to other ar). keep in mind when i said aesthetic, i dont
mean the guy should look cool... though that helps
... but i meant that it looks of good quality, just cant tell if it is.
i found one group of people saying the daniel defense m4 is an overpriced rifle, nicknamed the daniel delay for its
tight tolerance and jamming problems... however, everyone else seemed to hold them very high in the tier list picking
them over bushmaster and the same people claiming they never heard of core 15.
bushmaster always seemed like the middle ground interms of quality. great quality, however, their consistency with
batches were off.
now i am not expecting my gun to not have any jams(i expect a few when breaking it in) so i wont worry about that
unless it still jams after cleanings, lubing and after a few hundred rounds. my main concern is which is a good quality
AR that i can mod like crazy and expect to work after breaking it in.
thanks for your help, guys!
so after purchasing so many handguns and shotguns... i finally feel like its time
to get my first ar/m4 rifle.
i am trying to do my own research, but i always got the right answer/answers every time
i asked for help on this forum so i hope you guys can do it again for me.
so i am looking at;
daniel defense
bushmaster
core 15
those are the major 3 i am looking at and my price is around 1000 to 1500. now from what i understand,
people are saying that all models(base models for example all the way up to the higher end models) have the
same lower and top receivers... what makes them exceptionally different from each other is the bells and whistles
added on the frame... is this true? in which case, i am thinking of buying the lower end model and then upgrading
from that point.
it seems core 15 has the lowest price model, and from an aesthetic point, it looks alright... but i never shot one
and don't know how well it shoots(or should shoot compared to other ar). keep in mind when i said aesthetic, i dont
mean the guy should look cool... though that helps
i found one group of people saying the daniel defense m4 is an overpriced rifle, nicknamed the daniel delay for its
tight tolerance and jamming problems... however, everyone else seemed to hold them very high in the tier list picking
them over bushmaster and the same people claiming they never heard of core 15.
bushmaster always seemed like the middle ground interms of quality. great quality, however, their consistency with
batches were off.
now i am not expecting my gun to not have any jams(i expect a few when breaking it in) so i wont worry about that
unless it still jams after cleanings, lubing and after a few hundred rounds. my main concern is which is a good quality
AR that i can mod like crazy and expect to work after breaking it in.
thanks for your help, guys!



















































