Not all factory Superformance ammo uses Superformance powder. Same goes for Leverevolution stuff. Most factory ammo uses powder not available to the public.
With proper load development and with probably only trying a couple different powders you can most likely exceed the performance of the best factory ammo with handloads. You know that bullet works well in your rifle so I would try a couple common .223 powders (4895 and Varget come to mind) and go through the normal load development processes to find one your rifle likes.[/ would it matter if I use any type of case ?
Thanks , I tryed 6 different types of factory ammo,5 were grouping 1 1/2 to 2 moa. The Superformance 53g were doing 1 moa, with a 2x7 scope and crappy led sled. I'd like to make he reloads as close as possible to those Superformance. I'm looking for the 53g projectiles now, ( not having much luck) I have a couple hundred hornady brass, have some cci primers on the way. And some cfe powder. By the way ,it'll be my first time reloading,hence all the questions.You want to keep the cases consistent. If you have mixed brands of cases in a batch they could have different internal volumes and thus different pressures with the same powder charges and different velocities. That will result in some pretty bad groups.
For regular ammo I just make sure each batch is the same headstamp.
For target ammo I weight sort but don't notice too much of a difference. There are those who say weight sorting is very important and others who say it's not important at all. My 308 "match" ammo for example is all sorted to be +/- 1gr from a standard weight. I'm using "Hornady 308 Win Match" headstamp and they all weigh 164-166gr. I don't really notice too much difference to unsorted brass though. An easier way is to make sure an entire "set" of brass is from the same lot number from the manufacturer. Buying bags of unprimed brass is the normal way to do this.
what makes that factory cartridge work so well in my rifle,it would make sense that it's the 53 g projectile ,as no 55 g ,including the 55 g hornady ,placed as well as the 53, the 62 g did awe full also. Hornady zombie max 55, hornady Superformance ,have the same case,same powder?, so the only diff is the bullit weight.Hodgdon made the Superformance powder for Hornady; Hornady doesn't produce their own powder.
The retail powder is supposed to be the same powder used in the factory ammo. However as I mentioned earlier not all Superformance ammo uses Superformance powder. I'm sure some of the factory Superformance ammo does but not all.
The ones they list on the Hodgdon date site might use it; those include 22-250, 243, and 300WSM. Superformance is a pretty slow powder close to H4831 which may be why it doesn't work in 223. The factory Superformance 223 ammo might have a blend including Superformance powder or none at all, no way to tell.
I'd try Varget as that is a pretty good go-to powder for 223 and 308. I use Benchmark personally for my 223 loads but that's because I have a pile of it.
My goal is to repeat the accuracy I got out of these factory loads. I'll measure both the case and the overall lenght of cartridge , then take it apart and weigh the powder. Then try and replicate that as close as possible. These are some groups I got out of my new XCR-L .223 , at a 100 yards , using a2x7x33 VX1 and a led sled. As you can see the super dormancy did rally well. I'm gonna try these again , with a better scope. Hopefully it wasn't a fluke.


























