How much are the prices of antiques inflated by Antique Status in Canada?

NorthWoods22

Member
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm new here, I normally talk about guns on other american forums (like gunboards), but I had some canadian specific questions I didn't know where to ask, until a fellow collector friend pointed told me to post in this forum. Took me a while to find this sub-board, but i think it's the correct one.

Here's some stuff I had typed out (a lot of canadian prices i got in discussion with my friends, so they might not reflect the current market - I'd like your input), and I wanted to know your guys thoughts:


We all know that antiques, by definition, are historical. And being historical, many antique guns will have collector's value based solely on their historical collector's appeal.

At the same time, antique handguns often fetch exorbitant prices in Canada, because of the legal loophole created by 84(3)(a) of the Candian Criminal Code, which allows ownership of antique handguns that aren't regulated like restricted handguns.
For instance re-chambered or modified antiques can often fetch equally high prices in Canada as un-molested guns; while guns that have been recently modified from original condition almost always lose collector's value in countries outside of Canada (American and European markets).

So my question is, how much are values of antique guns in canada inflated solely by the legal "antique status" loophole?

In other words, if the government were to remove antique firearms from the provisions of 84(3) of the Candian Criminal Code and treat antique handguns like normal restricteds, how much value would these different antique handguns lose?

I've been paying attention to recent canadian prices (which seem to have jumped up a bunch the last year), american auctions, and compared with some of my past experiences in american/canadian gunshows, as well talked to several collector friends in the states and in canada.

We came up with a list of the most popular antique handguns in Canada, and ballparked some figures. I've tried to match this up from what i've seen in the American collector's market.

I know there are canadian importers who will buy up antique guns in the states for the purpose for reselling in Canada - and they've definitely affected the market on certain guns down south.
So to make the prices fair, I've taken what i've observed as the market values of their non Canadian antique status equivalents among the collector's market in America.
These are guns in parallel calibers, where one caliber change is the difference between antique/restricted in canada (e.g., 41 Colt vs 38 Colt); or guns that were produced both before and after 1898, leading to some being antique and others restricted (e.g., 1892 French Revolver). I'll often refer to the American collector's market prices, because non-antique versions of certain guns simply don't pop up that often in Canada, or they are classified as prohibs.

Here's what i've come up with. Prices reflect general mechanically functional "shooter quality", so not museum quality pieces nor complete rusted garbage. What do you think?

I would like your input, especially on Canadian prices, since there isn't much good public "completed sales" or auction data out there; I obviously know some examples are comically overpriced like the Mk I** webleys; but the the price ranges for other guns are from ad listings i've seen and what my friends have told me these guns are going for up here. The american prices are based on my impression from completed auctions and american gun shows.

================================

Guns that have significant collector's value independent of antique status; antique status only slightly increases value in Canada (<100% markup over non-antique equivalent)
Colt Single action army in 41 Colt
$3000-$5000+ CAD (?)
The 1st gen 45 colt SAA's go for just as much money if not more than the 41 SAA's, purely due to collectors value. Restricted status from being chambered in 45 Colt or 44-40 doesn't seem to affect original 1st gen Colt SAA collector's; they're buying it because it's a 1st gen Colt, not an in-the-woods shooter.

S&W 44 Russian Single Actions
$2000-$2500 CAD (?)
In America, the 44-40 originals are often worth more than the 44 Russian; around $1500-$2000 USD. Funny enough, in the American collector's market, the SA Model 3s are worth more than the DAs, because they appeal to single-action cowboy shooters. In fact, before repros, some american shooters would shoot original S&W top breaks, and only SA's were allowed in cowboy action shooting. This price discrepancy is reflected in the Standard Catalog of Smith & Wesson and Flayderman's Guide. Flayderman's, though old data, lists 44 NM 3's at $950 USD for VG, and 44 DA's at $750 USD for VG; while in Canada it seems like the double action versions are more desirable and expensive. Additionally non-Antique restricted repros (Uberti, Beretta Laramie) are relatively expensive, ~$1000-$1500 CAD. In America repros cost around $800-$1200 USD.

Webley WGs
$2000-$2500 CAD (?)
Post-1898 Non-Antiques (e.g., Army & Navy CSL marked WG's) seem to go for high prices in America too, due to legitimate collector's interest on both sides of the border.

Guns that have high collector's value, but antique status moderately inflates prices in Canada (~2x markup over non-antique equivalent)

S&W 44 Russian Double Actions
$2000-$2500 CAD
In America, the 44-40 version was worth more than the 44 Russian, normally around $1000-$2000 USD; at least before canadian importers started buying up the 44 russians and drove the prices up. This historical price difference is reflected in the Standard Catalog of Smith & Wesson and Flayderman's Guide (Flayderman's, though old data, lists 44 DA's at $750 USD for VG, and 44-40 DA's at $875 USD for VG).

Colt 41 Thunderer
$1500-$2500 CAD
In America, there is a surprising following around the 38 Colt Lightnings. In mechanically functional condition they run for $800-$1200 USD, though most have mechanical issues, driving the prices down. Post-1898 Thunderers run around the same.

Guns that have moderate collector value, but antique status greatly inflates prices in Canada (2-3x markup over non-antique equivalent)

Webley Mk I, II cut for 45 ACP
2000-$2500 CAD If we compare to a 45 ACP Cut Webley Mk VI or V (Boer War model) in america, those go for $800-1000 USD. Uncut go for $1000-$1500 USD. It's hard to compare in Canadian prices since an original Mk IV Boer War model has a 4" barrel, making it prohib. Note that in Canada, 45 ACP versions often go for the same price as the uncut 455 versions, while in American the original 455 is often worth 50% more

Swiss 1882 Revolver
$1500-$2500 CAD ()?
In America, the non-antiques go for around ~$750 USD. At $800 USD they seem to sit unsold.

Guns that have some collector value, but antique status significantly inflates prices in Canada (Over >3x markup over non-antique equivalent)

Webley Mk I** and II** cut for 45 ACP
$2500-$3500 CAD
If we compare to a 45 ACP Cut Webley Mk VI in america, those go for $600-800 USD. Uncut go for $1000-$1500 USD. I've seen cut webley Mk VI's in Canada go for <$1000 CAD. Let's be honest, the reason the Mk I** is so expensive in Canada is solely due to the reputation is that it is functionally a Mk VI with the ability to take low-pressure factory 45 ACP, while maintaining legal antique status.

Colt 1889/1892 in 41 Colt
$2500-$3500 CAD
In America, Colt 1892's in 38 colt in functional condition can be found $800-$1000 USD. Post-1898 41 Colt 1892s actually seem to go for less money, $600-$1000, since 41 Colt is so hard to come by; while 38 Colt can be reloaded using 38 spl components. Plus 1892 38 Colts tend to have more collector's value in the states since that was the version the US military adopted. Hard to find data for Canadian prices of post-1898 41 colt's.

French 1892 Revolvers
$1500-$2500 CAD
In america, non-antiques go for $400-$600 USD. Restricteds in Canada seem to go for the same amount in CAD. The Standard Catalog of Military Firearms lists "Excellent" condition as $500 USD and "Very Good" as $375 USD . Ones made in 1898 (American antique, but not Canadian antique) seem to fetch $600-$800 USD. Meanwhile Canadian pre-1897 antiques will readily sell at American auctions for >$1200 USD; it seems people are clearly importing them.

Swedish 1887 Nagant
$1500-$2500 CAD
In America, the non-antiques can be found $500-$600 USD all day long. In fact, even the US-only antiques (made in 1898, serial 350 to 3500; so US antique, but not Canadian antique) seem to have a hard time selling at $700 USD. Standard Catalog of Military Firearms lists "Excellent" as $550 USD and "Very Good" as $375 USD

Shooter-grade percussion revolvers
$1000-$2000 CAD (?)
In America, people will buy and shoot repros that cost $200-$400 USD; very few people shoot originals, and only do so sparingly. Original brand name (Colt, Remington, Starr) percussion revolvers have high collector's value; Refinished, "Sporterized" (e.g., conversion cylinders), and no-name brands (Manhattan, Bacon) percussion revolvers are significantly less valuable.

Guns that have no collector value, value in canadian market determined solely by antique status; most would be worthless overnight if 84(3)(a) were repealed (Over x5 markup over non-antique equivalent)

Belgian Bulldogs, RIC copies
$1000-$1500 CAD
Most non-antique belgian bulldogs (either 32 S&W or 38 S&W, or short barrel with post-1893 ELG stamp) are prohibs in canada. In American gunshows they barely sell; you can pick them up easily for $100-$200 USD. Even worse are belgian bulldogs that are modified/refinished/rechambered; they are sold as "wallhangers" for less than $100 in America.

Spur Trigger Suicide Specials
~$500-$1000 CAD
In america, a lot of the 22 short spur trigger suicide specials can be found for $100-$200 USD; cheaper at gunshows. In fact the 22 shorts are more desirable than 32/38/41 rimfires in the states, since they are still shootable with modern 22 CB shorts. The 22 spur triggers suicide specials are prohibs in canada so it is hard to find prices to compare.

Guns that cannot be compared; do not have non-antique equivalent; it is difficult to determine how much value is from collector's interest vs canadian importers buying them to bring up to Canada and resell as antique loophole shooter guns

French 1873 revolver
$1500-$2000 CAD
No good non-antique comparisons, so it is hard to determine collector's value from antique status value. In America they sell for $700-$1000 USD. Note that in America, ones modified or cut for other calibers (45 ACP) or refinished (e.g., nickel plated) are worth significantly less in collector's circles.

1883 Reichsrevolver
$1500-$2000 CAD
No good non-antique comparisons, so it is hard to determine collector's value from antique status value. In America they sell for $800-$1200 USD. Seems like in America there's the "German tax" on these, as german guns of all varieties have high collector's value; meanwhile in Canada the Reichsrevolver is often considered less desirable, likely due to its as inconvenient manual of arms as a shooter.

================================

Now I suspect there will be much weeping and gnashing of teeth once the government removes the antique loophole by taking antiques off the 84(3) list. Or even modifies 84(3.1) such antiques are no longer exempted from other provisions of the firearms act. Currently, under 84(3.1), antiques are only regulated in transport and storage, but it would not be hard to tack on a few other provisions removing them from other exemptions of the firearms act.

But if the loophole regarding discharging antique firearms outside of licensed ranges is ever removed, you can bet there will be lots of upset canadian gun owners. Especially among people who own guns from the latter 2-3 categories. Doubly so if they own a modified gun where they intentionally destroyed the historical collector's value to make a convenient caliber (e.g., rechamber) or easier-to-maintain (e.g., renickel) shooter.

On the other hand there will be many happy and eager S&W, Webley, German, and French gun collectors just south of the 49th.


What are your thoughts? Are my value assessments accurate or not? How can they be made more accurate?
Looking forward to seeing your thoughts.

-Northwoods22
 
Last edited:
I consider uncut Webley revolvers to be worth more than cut to 45 ones because I consider them to be less likely to have been abused or stressed with over pressure loads. This is more important to me than the originality of the uncut though I do also like them to be original for originality's sake.
 
I am unsure what your question is, basically you summed it up. There is a bunch of antique handguns in Canada which would instantly lose their value if they became restricted or had the same type of conditions as a restricted firearm.

Certain guns values would be relatively uneffected, but more than a few would go from thousands to hundreds overnight (possibly less with the requirements to register, and the subsequent deeming of some to be prohibited if they had to follow Restricted rules).

The french 1892 revolver is a excellent example of this where a restricted one is 400-800$ and a antique is 2k. Other examples of guns which would lose all value is ones like the derringers or other below 4.1” barrelled revolvers.
 
I wouldn't call antique status a "loophole".

I think the inordinate demand for antiques and the reputation they have as being "in the woods carry guns" for is the perfect example of a legal loophole. Sure, owning, possessing, and transporting antique handguns is 100% legal without licenses/ATTs, but the consequences of people buying them up as "in the woods carry guns" is completely due to a legislative oversight; i.e., a legal loophole.

I've looked through some of the older posts on this sub-board, and it's obvious a non-insignificant proportion of people buying antiques are not because of the historical collector's value, but because they want a handgun they can carry without an ATT. In fact, my first impressions of the old posts on this sub-board is that the MAJORITY (i.e., more than 50%) of antique buyers in canada are buying them for this purpose, rather than for appreciating the history of older guns.

That's why we see such dramatic disparity in values between a Webley Mk I and a Webley Mk IV, or between a an 1892 Lebel made in 1897 vs one made one year later.


Regarding legal loopholes, if you read the legislation it's quite obvious they never created the antiques classification with the intention of allowi people running around in the woods with 100+ year old handguns. Now I was a young shooter (wasn't quite a collector at that point) when they switched from the FAC system to the PAL system. But it's quite clear they created antiques as a classificaiton and exempted antiques so that Museums, Historians, and Re-enactors (hence the allowance for flintlock reproductions) would not be burdened by needing to put trigger locks on museum pieces, or needing every museum worker to own a PAL.

Specifically, the "Antique Carry" loophole arises from these pieces of legislation:
Criminal Code s 84(3) For the purposes of sections 91 to 95, 99 to 101, 103 to 107 and 117.03 of this Act and the provisions of the Firearms Act, the following weapons are deemed not to be firearms:
(a) antique firearms
  • 91 to 95 refer to possession/licensing/registration
  • 99 to 101 refer to trafficking/requirements for transferring
  • 103 to 104 refer to import/export
  • 105 to 107 refer to loss/destruction of a firearm
These were all done so museum workers wouldn't suddenly need to all have a PAL


Criminal Code s 84(3.1) Notwithstanding subsection (3), an antique firearm is a firearm for the purposes of regulations made under paragraph 117(h) of the Firearms Act and subsection 86(2) of this Act.
  • Refers to storage requirements

The firearms act is the legislation which regulates ATTs for restricteds and prohibs (and hence leads to restricteds being approved range use only). It only ever refers to antique firearms ONCE, in that it explicitly exempts requiring licenses for museum employees from to handle replicas of antique firearms.

If you put these two pieces of legislation together, it's pretty clear they didn't create the antiques categories so people could carry handguns in the woods. It's so museum workers would not be inordinately burdened. While it is 100% legal under a direct reading of the current legislation, it's pretty clear this is due to a gap in legislation, not the original intent in legislation. Hence, a legal loophole.

N.B. antique handguns are still legally defined as handguns AND as restricted/prohibited under 84(1). 84(3)(a) only exempts them from the possession/transport/import export requiremenst as listed above, as well as the majority of the firearms act (which regulates ATTs)

It is only a simple matter of knocking off some of the provisions of 84(3)(a) OR adding provisions to 84(3.1) to close the antiques loophole; no reclassification is needed.
 
You can get an antique Webley for over $3000. You can get a restricted one for under $1000. Prohib around $500. All the exact same gun.

Yes, this is precisely what I am referring to. It is absolutely astounding this disparity.
Thanks for your value estimates, it seems like Webley's are going for even more money these days in Canada than from when I last checked.



I am unsure what your question is, basically you summed it up. There is a bunch of antique handguns in Canada which would instantly lose their value if they became restricted or had the same type of conditions as a restricted firearm.

Certain guns values would be relatively uneffected, but more than a few would go from thousands to hundreds overnight (possibly less with the requirements to register, and the subsequent deeming of some to be prohibited if they had to follow Restricted rules).

The french 1892 revolver is a excellent example of this where a restricted one is 400-800$ and a antique is 2k. Other examples of guns which would lose all value is ones like the derringers or other below 4.1” barrelled revolvers.

That was the purpose of why I joined this forum to make this thread.

And I agree, as you can see, the 1892 French revolver and the spur trigger suicide specials rank pretty high on the "overvalued due to antique status" tiers; they are excellent examples of guns that would otherwise be worth significantly less if the antique loophole were closed.


I wanted to ask: which antiques are the most over-valued (relative to historical collector's value) because of the canadian antique status loophole?

In other words, which antiques stand to lose the most value if 84(3) or 84(3.1) is amended to close the antiques loophole?

That is why I have provided value estimates from both sides of the border, and I would like your input on (particularly) the canadian prices.
 
Last edited:
Overvalued? The Belgian clunkers. The revolver equivalents of the cheap shoguns. JABC. And the originally cheap nickel plated spur trigger rimfires
Lose the most value? The revolvers that bubba has altered for convenience. The needlessly rechambered ones. Those that have been refinished, ceracoated, renickeled.
 
I've looked through some of the older posts on this sub-board, and it's obvious a non-insignificant proportion of people buying antiques are not because of the historical collector's value, but because they want a handgun they can carry without an ATT. In fact, my first impressions of the old posts on this sub-board is that the MAJORITY (i.e., more than 50%) of antique buyers in canada are buying them for this purpose, rather than for appreciating the history of older guns.
.

Not gonna lie.

I 100% want an antique for the lack of ATT.
I have 0 interest in its historical significance. Id actually prefer if it had no historical significance so I don't feel guilty using it.

My shopping criteria is:
-will it go bang when its supposed to
-how available/expensive is the ammo
-is it reasonably accurate

The only thing holding me back is the price and the aversion to get into reloading
 
Take a basket case $400 Webley mkVI and put it's barrel and cylinder onto a basket case $1000 Webley mkII and you get a $3000 to $4000 magic no paperwork required shooting historical fun thing :)
 
I wanted to ask: which antiques are the most over-valued (relative to historical collector's value) because of the canadian antique status loophole?

In other words, which antiques stand to lose the most value if 84(3) or 84(3.1) is amended to close the antiques loophole?

That is why I have provided value estimates from both sides of the border, and I would like your input on (particularly) the canadian prices.

They can't be far apart. No barriers to import into either country except for a little extra shipping cost.


Free market supply & demand. No free lunch however.
 
They can't be far apart. No barriers to import into either country except for a little extra shipping cost.

I was under the impression the Americans passed new regulations in 2020 making it more difficult to export antique firearms made between 1890-1898

If you look at the new regulations here, they redefined antique firearms for export purposes to before 1890. That leaves a gap for guns made between 1890-1898 (so all webley's, lebels, 1892 colt's) as requiring an exporter to leave the USA.
https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/d...rearms-rule-posted-on-bis-website-7-7-20/file

Perhaps someone here with more recent experience in exporting antiques from the USA can chime in?
 
Last edited:
I would say they are not over valued but worth what ever someone is willing to pay.
Much like when we could still get good evil black rifles that were non restricted, they had a higher value than the same rifle that required documentation.
 
The way things are in Canada, any firearm a law-abiding person is allowed to possess is because of a loophole., that the government of the day can and does close at whim.

Regards
 
Back
Top Bottom