Hungry... for summer :)

Beaver

CGN Regular
Rating - 100%
42   0   1
Location
Oshawa, Ontario
Hey... Hungry,

The "AR-15/M16 FLATTOP RISER"s just came in from Brownells...

p_080000506_1.jpg


http://www.brownells.com/.aspx/pid=24621/Product/AR_15_M16_FLATTOP_RISER

Just hand tightened them on, but will have to Blue Lock Tight them on before April ;)


198916_10150103163286619_709236618_6827523_3624972_n.jpg


The scopes are the Falcon Menace 1.5-5x30 SIR with German style 4a reticle (left rifle), and Vortex Viper PST 1-5x24 with TMCQ MOA reticle ( right rifle, see also http://www.vortexoptics.com/product/vortex-viper-pst-1-4x24-riflescope-with-tmcq-moa-reticle ).

I will write up the review you requested on the TA31F: Trijicon ACOG 4x32 Scope with Red Chevron BAC Flattop Reticle – includes Flat Top Adapter ( see also http://www.trijicon.com/na_en/products/product3.php?pid=TA31F ), when time permits and will write up a review of the aforementioned Vortex Viper PST after I have used it a few times in Barrie and/or Ottawa.

Cheers!
 
Looking forward to reading how your results work with all the scopes and also your ACOG TA31F Chevron. That's what I'm running right now.

This coming season I wanted to run a simple 4X ACOG and learn how to use the chevron reticle in a hurry. Matches 1-4 are gonna be a pile of fun! :ar15:
 
Looking forward to reading how your results work with all the scopes and also your ACOG TA31F Chevron. That's what I'm running right now.

This coming season I wanted to run a simple 4X ACOG and learn how to use the chevron reticle in a hurry. Matches 1-4 are gonna be a pile of fun! :ar15:

Well, it is what works for you ;)

The ACOG TA31F Chevron works with BAC at close ranges (matches 1 - 4)... and BAC may or may not work for you.


Does the Bindon Aiming Concept (BAC) really work?

It does work; but it works better for some shooters than others. First, because the distance between your eyes is different and the tilt of your head are unique for each person, so is the shift from the unmagnified to the magnified view. In addition, if you have any form of phoria (which is common in older shooter), the shift is greater since your eyes don't track perfectly in alignment.

One thing that the Trijicon online demonstration doesn't show is that the point of aim changes slightly from weak (unmagnified) view to strong (magnified) view. This is because your brain is switching views from two entirely different angles; but using the reticle view superimposed by the dominant eye. The result is that a reticle that appears to be dead on target in the weak view suddenly jumps over a bit when you switch to the strong view (the strong view is the real point of impact if the scope is properly zeroed). This jump is determined by the factors I mentioned above.

Is it as fast at close range (i.e., under 25 yards) as a good dot sight?

No. A good dot sight is almost always faster, though with training and BAC you can minimize the difference. Check out the Reading Library thread tacked at the top of the Rifle forum for a comparison of times using irons, a dot sight, ACOG, and a low-powered variable scope by two trained shooters. The ACOG is a little slow in that one because the shots were taken exclusively with the magnified view. If we had shot with the weak eye (unmagnified view), it would have been a hair faster; but a little more uncertain where the hits would land. Since we were combining movement with shooting, it is real easy to throw them outside the desired target area using just the weak eye view.

Is the BAC a natural ability within the human optic system, or are the ACOG sights designed especially to work with the concept?

BAC is a natural human ability for anyone with good binocular vision and minimal phoria (Differences in alignment between two eyes are minimal). You do not need an ACOG to make it work. All your brain is doing is superimposing the reticle from the strong eye view over the target view from the weak eye. One thing you do need to make it work though, is good contrast between the reticle and the target. This can mean anything from an illuminated reticle to a thick post reticle or a circle/dot reticle to make the reticle easier to pick up.

If a design of the sight itself, which of Trijicon's optics offer the capability?

Any of the sights can be used that way; but the sights with "BAC" have a combination of tritium and fiber optic tube that illuminates the reticle at all times. This means that the contrast is very good and very easy to use. I imagine there are also a few trade secrets in the design that make it easy to use as the Trijicon scopes seem to be easier for me than any other optic. In most of the BAC scopes, Trijicon makes it even easier by using fairly thick, bold reticles that offer good contrast even when unilluminated.

One downside to illumination though is that if you get partial illumination and a background that is lit the same way (say a fine amber reticle at dusk, or a red t-shirt with a dimly lit red reticle), the reticle can seem to "disappear" briefly. I've never seen it in actual use; but I have been able to use an adjustable lighting system to tune the light and background just right.

http://www.thehighroad.org/archive/index.php/t-260338.html


I got rid of my ACOG, because the Tritium lamp no longer worked (they have a lifespan of about 10 years), and it really was more of a high-tech iron sight (with major cross-fire possibilities at close range when BAC is not used).

I'll do a formal review... when time permits :)


Hungry... you doing another M14 Clinic this year? I don't think I can make the March 19th one :(

I got a...

M14SE “CRAZY HORSE”®
http://www.smithenterprise.com/products02.html

and think that your M14 Clinic is a must !!!
 
Hows the Viper? I was looking at it but i thought the reticle was a bit wanky (for long range) :S went with a Hi Lux CMR insted
 
Hows the Viper? I was looking at it but i thought the reticle was a bit wanky (for long range) :S went with a Hi Lux CMR insted

I like the reticle for close (BAC) and long distance, but have not actually used it yet.

The Viper PST was vapour-ware until this year's Shot Show ;)

One aspect I do not like, is the lack of magnification beyond 4x

Really wish it were 1x - 6x, instead of 1x - 4x

The extra magnification would be really great 200 yards and beyond -- providing the same maximum magnification as the Elcan SpecterDR 1.5 - 6, just in case my friendly competitors are so equipted.

http://thepackingrat.net/2010/02/09/elcan-specterdr-an-overview/


As far as I can tell, the Hi Lux CMR is very similar to the Viper PST.


I like the CRS Zero Stop on the PST ;)


More importantly, is how well both of these will maintain and reset to zero.
 
Back
Top Bottom