Hunters in researchers' sights: Study explores what drives them

Thomas D'Arcy McGee

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
hunting-study.png

A new study of the habits and motivations of hunters suggests white-tailed deer and moose are the game most New Brunswick hunters are interested in. (Shane Fowler/CBC)

Hunters in researchers' sights: Study explores what drives them

Although hunters contribute $145M to the provincial economy, they haven't been studied much until now

By Shane Fowler, CBC News Posted: Dec 28, 2017 6:00 AM AT Last Updated: Dec 28, 2017 6:00 AM AT

For the first time, a study has looked into what motivates New Brunswick hunters — and apparently it's the chance to be in nature.

The New Brunswick Provincial Survey on Hunting compiled responses from more than 400 hunters across the province on a range of issues, including the game they prefer, how much money they spend, and what makes them hunt.

​The study was triggered by a decline in the number of hunting licences being sold in New Brunswick, said Daniel Gautreau, a researcher at the University of Moncton in Edmundston who helped prepare the report.

"We thought it would be important to look at what was happening with hunters regarding different subject matter."

Commissioned by the province two years ago, the study points to white-tailed deer as the animal most hunters want to get.

About 95 per cent of respondents expressed their desire to hunt antlered deer, regardless of whether they had ever purchased a permit to do so.

Moose came in a very close second, also being chosen by about 95 per cent.

"This is consistent across North America," Gautreau said. "The deer family is the important game species that we have in North America."

Bears down the list
Bears were among the least important game species to those surveyed, with only 56 per cent of hunters expressing interest in the animal.

Waterfowl and migratory birds came in last, a choice of 41 per cent of hunters.

The study's findings suggest that Crown land is the most used territory for hunting, as opposed to woodlots and industrial freeholds.

But it appears hunters want more active policing of New Brunswick woods.

"More than half of the hunters that were surveyed did indicate that they wanted more conservation officers out there," Gautreau said.

"We know there's not many conservation officers out there, and this, I guess, gives the right-of-way to poachers to go out and do what they do. And honest hunters don't like that, and they wish that there were more conservation officers to control the amount of poaching out there."

According to the study, a New Brunswick hunter spends thousands of dollars each hunting season.

"We've calculated the expenses of hunters in 2015 was worth around $145 million, which is significant and contributes to the diversification of what forests can bring to the economy," Gautreau said.

The study broke hunters into two groups: those who spend less than $10,000 annually on hunting and those who spend more.

Most fall into the first category and spend an average of $3,000 a year on hunting.

But those who spend more seem to go all out.

"The second group, which is a minority group, they had very high expenses," Gautreau said. "We found their expenses to be around $28,000 per year."

The hunting drive
The study also asked hunters what they get most out of the sport.

"To make the most of nature or of being outdoors" topped the list of motivating factors, with 99 per cent of hunters surveyed declaring it an important factor.

Spending time with friends or family was chosen by 97 per cent of hunters.

Bringing home meat ranked only eighth among aspects of the hunt considered valuable. It was chosen by 81 per cent of hunters.

Bringing home a trophy placed last, with 49 per cent of hunters saying it was important to them.

Valuable information
Gautreau said he expects this study will be used to help shape, or even create, policies surrounding hunting and natural resource management in years to come.

"It's the first type of study on hunters in New Brunswick that I know of, with this detail," he said. "Studies like this exist throughout North America, especially in the United States."

"The U.S.A. has been very good at studying the human dimensions of wildlife management, and hunters are part of that."

The information is valuable in that country for developing policies on wildlife management, forest management, land use planning, rules and regulations.
 
The hunting drive
The study also asked hunters what they get most out of the sport.

"To make the most of nature or of being outdoors" topped the list of motivating factors, with 99 per cent of hunters surveyed declaring it an important factor.

Spending time with friends or family was chosen by 97 per cent of hunters.

Bringing home meat ranked only eighth among aspects of the hunt considered valuable. It was chosen by 81 per cent of hunters.

Bringing home a trophy placed last, with 49 per cent of hunters saying it was important to them.

Sounds about right,
 
Any time they study hunters, or shooters in general, it provides more stats that the antis can twist to their advantage.
This one at least has some we can use to ours.
The fact that trophy's came dead last as a reason to hunt is one.

Maybe, but the fact that actually taking an animal is so low on the list begs the question. "Why can't you have the same experience without killing anything?"
 
Maybe, but the fact that actually taking an animal is so low on the list begs the question. "Why can't you have the same experience without killing anything?"

Because I know that if I want to eat meat, an animal must die. As a hunter (also known as a wildlife game manager) I just want to do my part plus hunting allows me to bypass the middle man (grocery store)
All in all I thought the results of the survey were pretty good.
 
Because I know that if I want to eat meat, an animal must die. As a hunter (also known as a wildlife game manager) I just want to do my part plus hunting allows me to bypass the middle man (grocery store)
All in all I thought the results of the survey were pretty good.

I like your term "wildlife game manager". Conservationist or sportsman also work well.

Wonder why "eating organically fed animals" or "living off the land" didn't make the list? Hard for the sandals and granola crowd to make it past those concepts.
 
I like your term "wildlife game manager". Conservationist or sportsman also work well.

Wonder why "eating organically fed animals" or "living off the land" didn't make the list? Hard for the sandals and granola crowd to make it past those concepts.

Very much the opposite of how nature manages wildlife, predators take the easiest prey, usually the old, sick and weak making the prey animals stronger but man takes the biggest and strongest, long term any not be the best wildlife game management strategy.
 
I find the average of 3000$ a year to be quite high. Yes some folks spend a lot of money on guides and hunting cabins but many many New Brunswickers are hunting with a rifle they inherited, an old box of shells and a full tank of gas. If i add up the cost of a my rifle, optic, stand, clothing, deep freeze, etc. and I’d be right at the 3000$ limit but now I’m set for years to come.
 
Very much the opposite of how nature manages wildlife, predators take the easiest prey, usually the old, sick and weak making the prey animals stronger but man takes the biggest and strongest, long term any not be the best wildlife game management strategy.

Not really.
The smartest, most caggy are the usually the biggest and harder to get. The young and dumb are usually the first taken and the monsters that are hunted by those in search of a trophy are many times old and sterile but still big enough to fend off productive males that could actually mate.
With moose and elk, taking the large, old bulls is a better tactic to get the cows bred.
 
I find the average of 3000$ a year to be quite high. Yes some folks spend a lot of money on guides and hunting cabins but many many New Brunswickers are hunting with a rifle they inherited, an old box of shells and a full tank of gas. If i add up the cost of a my rifle, optic, stand, clothing, deep freeze, etc. and I’d be right at the 3000$ limit but now I’m set for years to come.

"Average" would maybe also include out of Province i.e. USA hunters?

You do raise a good point however and that is how did they get their numbers? Obviously the government has the number of licences sold and could do a survey based on that or random phone calling. Bottom line is we in the community have not been able to raise our profile to where it should be economically, socially and with respect to public safety.
 
I agree, the snowflakes that live in the city have no idea how a good percentage of the population chose to enjoy the outdoors and the activities to be enjoyed. There needs to be a PR campaign that gets the point across that true hunters are the ones that care the most about the woods and biodiversity. Ducks unlimited has he right idea of putting up signs on the habitat they’ve really restored.
 
I agree, the snowflakes that live in the city have no idea how a good percentage of the population chose to enjoy the outdoors and the activities to be enjoyed. There needs to be a PR campaign that gets the point across that true hunters are the ones that care the most about the woods and biodiversity. Ducks unlimited has he right idea of putting up signs on the habitat they’ve really restored.

unfortunately there is a new breed of granola eating snowflakes in the big cities that are starting movements that encourage living off the land as an ethical choice for environement friendly meat consumption. These folks are dead against modern meat farming and industrial harvesting methods and are now starting groups to assist each other to become "ethical hunter/gatherers". They have a name for thier movement and have some real snowflake ideas about hunting and what animals are food and what animals they don't agree with hunting. These "hunters" support bear hunting bans, cougar and wolf hunting bans but are all about harvesting fish, birds, deer, mushrooms and plants ect.
I'm all for new hunters keeping the tradition alive but I fear we will be having real problems with these new modern city dwelling fruitnut hunters and some of thier divisive ideas about what we should hunting and not hunting. Let's just hope they don't get any more media or political attention.
 
Very much the opposite of how nature manages wildlife, predators take the easally the old, sick and weak making the prey animals stronger but man takes the biggest and strongest, long term any not be the best wildlife game management strategy.

Laugh2

Whenever I hear someone repeat that tired old bullschit line I know they have zero knowledge of wildlife or conservation. Predators are opportunists and will take whatever they think they can get. The young and dumb are the easiest prey, but plenty of strong, mature ungulates are taken down by predators. The biggest animals have already spread their genes around, they may spend more time fighting than breeding and they may be past prime breeding years. Females need a sperm supply, it doesn't really matter if it comes from a trophy size animal or his younger cousin.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom