I need help determining the correct load

chemo

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
157   0   0
I had new bullets to find a good load (actually I've had the bullets for a while, but never loaded them yet) and I decided to try the Dan Newberry's Optimal charge weight method.

If anyone is familiar with the method please confirm:
my guess would be the OCW is just under 44,8 since it is the scattergroup and that both 44,4 and 45,2 grouped around the same point of impact (on average)

On the other hand, I'm using a falcon optic that is relatively unused so the knobs are a bit stiff, frozen hands probably didnt help either. As you can see after my sighters and foulers, I decided to turn it down and right a bit to have the shots hit white area(or so I tought). If I went overboard with the windage because I didn't feel the knob enough and the real point of impact is actually more (on average) like the one for the 45,6 and 46,0 load (with the scatter group being 45,2) then the OCW would be 45,6.

Doing a normal load development of course I'd pick the clover leaf, but since I'm trying the Newberry method, I'd like to pursue it till the end.

Oh and also, before I forget; here are the specs
308WIN
fireformed win brass
CCI 200 primer
H4895: 44,4-46,2gr
Sierra 155gr matchking
COL: 2,830 (this seating depth is absolutely arbitrary, my rem 700 chamber is very long as with many other rems, lands would take a cartridge longer than 2,950'', these bullets cannot be seated that far)



Dan Newberry's OCW:
http://optimalchargeweight.embarqspace.com/#
 
Okay, I read the link info and kind of get what he trying to do, but sorry, the charge to use is 44.4.

Newberry suggests that you could tighten the OC with seating depth changes, but as you have already stated, you can not make them longer and have them fit in the magazine. If you are only shooting paper, then I would continue and then play with seating depth, but if you really NEED to have more rounds in the magazine I believe you have found a sweet spot for that rifle already.

Load a bunch at 44.4 and try them at different temperatures, etc. Just my 2 cents.
 
I could seat them farther since I will always single load, but then again, as for all the lands distance theory I wouldn't gain anything. If I had a chrony maybe I could play with the depth...
The only time I'd be needing more than 1 in the gun would be while hunting, and I have a whole other load for hunting.

IMO the cloverleaf was just plain luck, I'm just an average shooter. I try not to dismiss 45.6 and 46.0 which are both sub-moa (center to center)...
 
I would load the 44.4 and 45.6 loads again see if you can duplicate the groups.

Load 10 of each plus a few foulers/barrel warmers and then do 2 groups of 5 of each load alternately or round robin.
 
I could seat them farther since I will always single load, but then again, as for all the lands distance theory I wouldn't gain anything. If I had a chrony maybe I could play with the depth...
The only time I'd be needing more than 1 in the gun would be while hunting, and I have a whole other load for hunting.

IMO the cloverleaf was just plain luck, I'm just an average shooter. I try not to dismiss 45.6 and 46.0 which are both sub-moa (center to center)...


That is the great thing, when you find the load your rifle loves, all you have to do is hold it steady and squeeze the trigger. FS
 
Back
Top Bottom