SpeedFreakPL
CGN Regular
- Location
- Toronto, Ontario
in the past with a firearm related offence but have been acquitted can you still get a PAL license and acquire non restricted/restricted weapons?
in the past with a firearm related offence but have been acquitted can you still get a PAL license and acquire non restricted/restricted weapons?
How am i a troll? Im asking a simple question
How will it hamper my firearms licensing? Do you even know the definition of acquitted?Acquitted does not mean that you were not found guilty, or had the charges dropped.
You were arrested for firearm offenses and as such, this will hamper your firearms licensing.
Maybe slow down a bit, ya speed freak.![]()
![]()
Section 88(1) Possession of weapon for dangerous purposewhat were you charged with?
What are you talking about?Apparently it didnt matter last time so why ask now?
Perhaps your first thread on a firearm forum should be a little less dramatic. How about this: Introduce yourself, shoot the s**t for a while in various forums so you're not brand new and your motivation is not suspect, then maybe bring a question like this up.
Just some advice, brother. Do with it what you will. And welcome to CGN.
Paul
You were accused of being a troll because of the flags you set off. You appeared as either an antigunnut or some criminal trying to find loopholes. You're probably going "WHAT?!"
Think of it as underage kids on Airsoft Canada forum trying to get airsoft. Except on here, the issue is way more serious.
If you were not convicted of anything, than under the section where it asks if you have been convicted of a criminal offense, check the "no" box.
Be truthful on your application - in the 'convicted' box check 'no' since you weren't convicted.
However, be fully prepared for the RCMP and CFC to go over your record with a fine-toothed comb because of the charge which will show up on a background check.
They may call you, and your references. Be truthful and unemotional about the situation. Saying things like "this idiot cop decided that..." will NOT earn you the 'benefit of the doubt.'
Other than that, I'd just say hope for the best (a 'yes') but prepare for the worst (a 'no').
-M
I figured as much. Question is can they legally say "NO".Happened 10 years ago, and you have not had any further run in's with the law?
Sure sounds like you would not have any grief getting your rpal or pal, but who knows for sure short of applying for one if the CFC is going to give you any more that the standard questions or dig further.
Im planning to do everything you pointed out, but im looking for a 100% answer here. I dont want to waste 225 bucks to do the course only to find out that because of this theres no point of even bothering...
I figured as much. Question is can they legally say "NO".