Well hopefully the research and the text that the author wrote about is factual and not compromised in a attempt "to just sell books" quickly.Been out of print for years. Also, fwiw, the author was later disgraced. He allegedly humped some of the rifles pictured in his book to sell them later at significant profit.
I sold my copy on eBay maybe 5 years ago and got something like 100 USD for it. I was surprised.
I’m confused.. How do you prove a rifle has been humped to justify adding the extra cost?Been out of print for years. Also, fwiw, the author was later disgraced. He allegedly humped some of the rifles pictured in his book to sell them later at significant profit.
I sold my copy on eBay maybe 5 years ago and got something like 100 USD for it. I was surprised.
Some of the photos of rifles in the books apparently had faked markings, but aside from that, I think the book was well written.Well hopefully the research and the text that the author wrote about is factual and not compromised in a attempt "to just sell books" quickly.
If the allegations are true it sounds like he was motivated by the almighty dollar.
What is your opinion of the book? Have you come across anything that seemed that seemed to differ in your knowledge of Indian Enfields?
When a tired rifle is sold with mismatched numbers and markings, then re-appears for sale as matching and pristine condition with a big price tag, you can draw whatever conclusions you like.I’m confused.. How do you prove a rifle has been humped to justify adding the extra cost?