Ipsc World, Congrats To A Canadian

What a duche, its more a top 10 list of people Vince doesn't like. Interesting how the majority are from the Enos forum that Vince ran away from.
I guess I didn't get under his skin enough with my dislike of the drug testing policy, I'll try harder next time.:evil:
 
Last edited:
"IPSC and/or it's Senior Management"

I think that it's more of a list of people who had issues with the latter, than the former... Actually, I'm surprised I'm not on it, given some of my posts on that forum... Ohh, well.
 
Top Ten

Hi all,

Figured I would intorduce myself. One of your members was kind enough to let me know I had won this award and I'd just like to make the rounds and let everyone know that I am alive and well and trying to figure out a way to repeat for next year.

I do expect the Canadian equivilent of a tickertape parade down Broadway should I visit up north anytime soon.

Look me up at the AWARE in VT this July, I will be shooting on Friday.

Jim Norman
 
Last edited:
HHAHAHAAH,...Ryan you are such a #### -disturber!!! LOL

I thought for sure I would make it after my rant about Production proposed rule changes.
 
Our sweet little Ryan a feces ossilator?!?!

Can't be.

If it wouldn't be just two childish, I'd suggest starting up the

Official CGN Top 10 Self Important IPSC Mandarin's list
 
from the global village
QUOTE(Mike Dame @ 16 May 2007, 09:19 pm)
"Looks like some one has a little too much time on their hands."

Vinny: Unless I'm one of your paid employees, how is that any of your concern?

If I post something here at the official IPSC forum which you find objectionable, let me know. However unless and until that happens, whatever I post on one of my personal websites is my business alone, not yours.

This thread closed.
 
I'd have to say that that shows Vinces true character more than anything else he's ever done. I know a few people on that list and know what a lot of their grief is, and it's pretty much dead on..
 
Looks like ryan made the list because he called one of vinces production rules/ideas retarded, or refered to the forum wittle Vinny created cause he ran away from Enos a "wasteland" I can't let Ryan be the lone Canadian on the list, time to start pushing vinny's buttons.
 
Last edited:
Nope...its on his personal webpage.

Sigh, I just pointed out that IPSC production rules were uninforceable and making more rules was retarded.


He keeps kicking himself in the ass. He said allowing the CZ SP01 into Production was the worst thing he has done. Well it seams he hasn't correct his mistakes. He just solved the problem by letting the other MONSTERS in.
 
Musky Hunter said:
He keeps kicking himself in the ass. He said allowing the CZ SP01 into Production was the worst thing he has done. Well it seams he hasn't correct his mistakes. He just solved the problem by letting the other MONSTERS in.
Click to expand...

Well, not wishing to start a new thread here, but I don't think letting the SP01 in was a bad idea - it's a good gun, and nothing more than an improved version of the old 75. The total ####up was deeming all those "custom" CZ-USA parts to be OFM - that's total bull####, and resulted in prod-legal SP01s which are nothing more than a collection of competition components...
 
Musky Hunter said:
I agree omen. But his idea of single action trigger pull test was simply f**king retarded.
Click to expand...

Although IPSC decided not to go thru with it, USPSA is still proposing this for 2008 I believe......, so I wonder if any collaboration was done at the last meeting............?
 
Funny, EVERYONE was totally ignoring me when I was pointing out that baby eagles' SA would not reliably pass 3lb barely out of the factory... I posted the same msg a few times, and every single time it was just skipped over, without anyone even making any references to it... ohh, well.... Just ignore the comments which blow your idea apart, and proceed regardless, I guess.

I'm glad that idea was put aside (FOR NOW), but I doubt it had anything to do with any of the 'senior management' changing their mind about it...

as far uspsa proposing it, it does make sense, since they officially endorse trigger jobs - so they are just setting a bottom limit to how much you can modify it. With ipsc, no trigger work is 'officially' allowed, but if you put in a test, you're basically giving up on the idea of no modifications, and it becomes like uspsa... which, probably, it already actually is, but no one is ready to admit that, haha ;)

it shouldn't be 3lb, though, too many guns, with prod-legal configs won't pass that reliably.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom