Is Eotech worth it

Hoppka47

Member
Rating - 100%
3   0   0
Location
Ottawa
I have a 9mm Carbine coming in soon and I have a 556 sporting rifle. Will need to get another optic, i like red dots over magnified scopes and Im wondering if its time to get an eotech and I have been playing with lower end vortex and firefield red dots up until now.

Are they worth it or is purely hyped up advertising to sell expensive gear.
 
Reliable in any weather conditions and you can bang it against your head as many times as you want, it will still work.
 
Get a look through one first. I did a bit of custom work on a rifle for a friend, and he left it with an Eotech to mount at the end. I took a look through the thing and laughed out loud; it was like some weird laser show effect, this blurry sparkling ring and dot (turned out with the right reading glasses on it was 2 dots, one centred, one just below) which made it basically impossible to pay attention to whatever was in front of the rifle. Like nearly explosive special effects, all shimmering. I can't remember which glasses made it sort of almost possible to look at the thing without just finding it silly, but do remember that although the reticle did become maybe 90% clear, whatever was downrange became a blurry mess with those glasses on. So, impossible to use in combination. There's no way I could use an Eotech.

I can shoot with my Burris FastFire III with 3MOA red dot. It flares out just slightly, but not enough to put me off target. I can shoot with my Holosun gold dot sight too, with a 2MOA dot, and it barely flares at all for me. 2" groups at 50 yards kneeling with that on my GSG-16. So it's not that it's a dot sight. It's something altogether different and weird about the Eotech. And it cost about as much as the Burris and Holosun combined. Apparently my friend can use it okay. Just need to check with your own eyes.
 
Have a look through one first. I find the Eotech to be awful to look through. The reticle is never sharp and the idiotic dot surrounded by a big circle just obscures everything downrange. A simple dot would be 100x better.
 
Two different technologies. Holographic offers clear advantages for speed.
If its a range toy. There is no need. If its for serious competition, you might as weĺl.
 
My experience with everything from cheap offshore knock offs to the goods stuff. You typically will get what you pay for as far as the durability goes with the more expensive brands. The cost is profit + R&D costs to make sure their product passes the tests of the masses. But if you're just plinking at the range or back yard, you can get away with the cheaper stuff.

https://amzn.to/3RTr6Ke

The other members input is also correct, dots and halos and such don't work that great if you've got astigmatism. It really flares out that red of the halo can causes more chaos than needed in your sight picture. I prefer a single dot for that reason.
 
The '3' models with NV modes excel under night vision but in all other aspects LED based red dots kill it in every other metric.

If you want the reticle theres some higher end holosuns with circle dot reticles now that don't eat batteries the way eotechs do.
 
My glasses corrected for astigmatism, so I had NO Prob with a cheap "Donut of Death" (Love that phrase) for my 22s. Then I got Cataract surg and NO Glasses Needed !! Still using my cheap "DoD" on a 22, but 'Real' scopes on all others except the SKS. For 'real' target shooting one needs a scope for better than Min of Beer Can. (Or steels :rolleyes:) I can only get 2-3 MOA @ 50 with a 22LR and 'DoD'.
OP - You should talk with others at your range to try some of their scoped rifles.
 
OUCH - $3356 + TAX !! If I sold all my other scopes and got QD for All my rifles . . . still only 8x. (Edit - AGM, not Eotech -AND on the AGM website it says 15X 'base mag' plus 8x Digital. AND only $2K USD )

I dont think that was the right link lol. That's not a compact red dot, that's a thermal imager.
 
I think the Eotechs are worth it. My experience is from owning an EXPS3, so I can only really speak regarding that optic, but I have found it to be satisfactory for the price.
I would say that of all the optics I’ve used it provides the best both eyes open shooting experience of them all.
At a hundred yards or so a magnifier is a very nice add on, but only really becomes necessary at two hundred or so.
 
If you've got no astigmatism the donut of death is unparalleled for CQB sub 400m... Half that if we're talking PCC.

LOL, sub 400m…. Your eyes are better than mine. I’ll take magnified optics over red dots any day for general purpose. Pure CQB (well under 400m), sure.

I do like EOtech, particularly the reticle. For the OP, you’ll have to try one out to see if it’s for you. Not everyone is a fan. I’d also look at Aimpoint.
 
I have a 9mm Carbine coming in soon and I have a 556 sporting rifle. Will need to get another optic, i like red dots over magnified scopes and Im wondering if its time to get an eotech and I have been playing with lower end vortex and firefield red dots up until now.

Are they worth it or is purely hyped up advertising to sell expensive gear.

I haven't read the entire thread. Take a look at Primary Arms Cyclops 9mm Prism Optics.

-S.
 
I have a Vudu FFP 1-6 on my 223/556 rifle and I love it. Glass is clearer than my Steiner T5xi. No complaints whatsoever. Like others have said, don't cheap out on optics. German or Japanese glass is where its at.
 
Back
Top Bottom