Is my Longbranch unique?

David_K

Regular
Rating - 100%
18   0   0
Location
Edmonton, AB
I have a 1945 Longbranch Lee Enfield No4 Mk1* that when it was rearsenaled or whatever, the magazine that was put into it had the previous serial number crossed off with an electropencil. Then a new one was stamped on.

The thing is, it's the same number. So it's the original mag and they crossed off the old number which is still clearly visible and stamped the same one again.
 
You're right. Early ones were numbered. My '41 Mk. I is. But apart from early production, magazine numbering was not standard practice.
The majority of LB rifles went into the general supply chain, and did not remain in Cdn. service. A renumbered magazine would likely be a result of a rebuild program. No doubt the policy was to strike out and apply the number of the receiver in a uniform manner, without regard for what the number on the magazine happened to be.
 
Most of the LB Greek return rifles had the mags numbered by the Greeks...easy way to tell if you have one is the number only is stamped in to the base of the mag...they did not stamp the letter "L" just the actual numerals....weird eh?
Cheers Paul
 
Most of the LB Greek return rifles had the mags numbered by the Greeks...easy way to tell if you have one is the number only is stamped in to the base of the mag...they did not stamp the letter "L" just the actual numerals....weird eh?
Cheers Paul

This is very likely because some mags only feed properly with some rifles or maybe some rifles only free properly with some mags.
 
Most of the LB Greek return rifles had the mags numbered by the Greeks...easy way to tell if you have one is the number only is stamped in to the base of the mag...they did not stamp the letter "L" just the actual numerals....weird eh?
Cheers Paul

Ha! I've had my Greek return 1949 LB for a long time and never noticed that...you're right, no L on the mag!
 
Back
Top Bottom