I just picked up a laminated stock SKS. The manufacturer was supposed to be Izhevsk but I don't know where to look to check that. The rifle has a 1953 stamp on the rear receiver cover. The stock, receiver and the top and bottom bolt all have matching numbers. The bottom bolt half (non chromed part) has the number electropenciled in as well as an actual stamp so everything looks original. The bottom of the magazine has a different number with 5 or 6 digits. There are virtually no wear marks in the receiver indicating the rifle has been used. The stock has a chip and the usual bad shellac job, but otherwise is solid.
My understanding was laminates were refurbs until 1955 when they were standard issue. I find it curious that the stock number matches the others. Also the lack of wear marks and shiny blueing where the bolt moves on the receiver makes me think the rifle was never issued or just test fired.
I bought the rifle as a cheap shooter. Should I put this one away as a collector and get another one, or should I start pounding on it. If its some kind of rare gem, I don't want to mess with it. I saw an SKS sell for 3K on a US site so in 10-20 years, and after guys bubba most of the rifles on the market, these things might have some value.
What do you think?
My understanding was laminates were refurbs until 1955 when they were standard issue. I find it curious that the stock number matches the others. Also the lack of wear marks and shiny blueing where the bolt moves on the receiver makes me think the rifle was never issued or just test fired.
I bought the rifle as a cheap shooter. Should I put this one away as a collector and get another one, or should I start pounding on it. If its some kind of rare gem, I don't want to mess with it. I saw an SKS sell for 3K on a US site so in 10-20 years, and after guys bubba most of the rifles on the market, these things might have some value.
What do you think?





















































