Hey all, so I own some Primary Arms variable optics - a couple of SLX series (a 1-6 and a 3-18), a PLX (6-30), but I'm having problems with a GLX 6-24.
I thought it would be a great scope, but at the edges of the elevation adjustment, the eyebox goes all wonky.
If I adjust elevation down or up (e.g. dial it down to zero it on a 20 MOA rail, or dial it up for a long shot) I get crazy scope shadow at lower magnifications. At 24x it's not that bad, but it's still there. If I adjust my eye to compensate for the scope shadow, then the field of view becomes an oval and the top is cut off. In essence, I would have to adjust my cheekpiece different for every shot at a different elevation setting.
This doesn't seem right.
Did I get a lemon? Or are other GLX scopes like this? Because if they're all like this, that's a real design flaw. I'm really hoping I got a lemon and can get this warranty replaced...
I've enclosed some photos to show what I'm talking about. Apologies for the potato focus on the reticle, I was using my phone's camera, and needed to use the illumination dial on the scope to get the reticle to show up...
At low magnification, when the reticle is centred in the visual field,
with a normal eye placement, you get significant scope shadow
___________________________________
When you move your eye to be high or low to offset this scope shadow,
you cut off a significant portion of the field of view and the image becomes distorted
___________________________________
At maximum magnification, this is less of a problem,
but the reticle gets blurry towards the edges of the field of view
I thought it would be a great scope, but at the edges of the elevation adjustment, the eyebox goes all wonky.
If I adjust elevation down or up (e.g. dial it down to zero it on a 20 MOA rail, or dial it up for a long shot) I get crazy scope shadow at lower magnifications. At 24x it's not that bad, but it's still there. If I adjust my eye to compensate for the scope shadow, then the field of view becomes an oval and the top is cut off. In essence, I would have to adjust my cheekpiece different for every shot at a different elevation setting.
This doesn't seem right.
Did I get a lemon? Or are other GLX scopes like this? Because if they're all like this, that's a real design flaw. I'm really hoping I got a lemon and can get this warranty replaced...
I've enclosed some photos to show what I'm talking about. Apologies for the potato focus on the reticle, I was using my phone's camera, and needed to use the illumination dial on the scope to get the reticle to show up...
At low magnification, when the reticle is centred in the visual field,
with a normal eye placement, you get significant scope shadow
___________________________________
When you move your eye to be high or low to offset this scope shadow,
you cut off a significant portion of the field of view and the image becomes distorted
___________________________________
At maximum magnification, this is less of a problem,
but the reticle gets blurry towards the edges of the field of view




















































