it is time for Yukoners to raise their concern for grizzly hunting

medvedqc

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
266   0   2
Location
Whitehorse, YT
they are back at us.

it is not only for BC now....

h t t p ://www.gov.yk.ca/news/17-087.html

FOR RELEASE
April 28, 2017
Public survey on grizzly bear conservation and management

The Government of Yukon and the Yukon Fish and Wildlife Management Board are asking Yukoners to complete an online survey about grizzly bear conservation and management.

The information collected from this survey will help develop a territory-wide management plan. The plan will provide strategic direction related to grizzly bear conservation and management across Yukon.

The survey takes approximately 20 minutes and can be completed online. The deadline for completing the survey is May 27, 2017.

Quotes

“The Government of Yukon is committed to ensuring healthy wildlife populations and the conservation of grizzly bears. It is important to understand and appreciate the different values and relationships Yukoners have with bears. As environmental stewards we must work together to responsibly manage wildlife and our sustainable interactions with them.”

- Minister of Environment Pauline Frost

“The Yukon Fish and Wildlife Management Board is committed to ensuring the management of wildlife and their habitats is governed by the principle of conservation under the Umbrella Final Agreement. We are making provisions for public involvement in the development of the plan and we are reaching out to Yukoners with this survey.”

- Chair of Yukon Fish and Wildlife Management Board, Frank Thomas

Quick facts

In 2014, the Yukon Fish and Wildlife Management Board (YFWMB) sought public comment on a proposed Wildlife Act regulation change that would have made it illegal to harvest grizzly bears within 30m of some highways in the Southern Lakes area during the spring bear hunting season.
Based on input received, in 2015 the YFWMB recommended the Government of Yukon develop a management plan for grizzly bears that considers all aspects of grizzly bear conservation and management, including roadside hunting. Since then, the Fish and Wildlife Management Board and the Department of Environment established a working group that has been collaborating with First Nations governments, the Inuvialuit, Renewable Resources Councils and interest groups to identify the range of issues the plan should address.
There are an estimated 6,000 to 7,000 grizzly bears in Yukon.
There is limited data on the status of grizzly bear populations in Yukon. In most of the territory the population status of grizzly bears is unknown. In some areas there may be conservation concern.
Grizzly bears are nationally assessed by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada as Special Concern. Once listed in the federal Species at Risk Act, a management plan for the species across Canada is required. The Yukon plan will inform the federal process.

Learn more: Survey on grizzly bear conservation and management in Yukon

Contact:

Sunny Patch
Cabinet Communications
867-332-0362
sunny.patch@gov.yk.ca

Traolach Ó Murchú
Communications, Environment
867-393-7442
traolach.murchu@gov.yk.ca

News Release #17-087
 
Wildlife management should not be done based on public sentiment and emotions ... You can't and shouldn't manage wildlife populations that way....
Just wait for it .... Soon the screaming will start over fishing ... Catch & release
 
Grit,

they have done in the past and they are trying it again. they will have no choice to do public meeting. if you do remember in 2014 it is only become some hunters voiced their concerns that the law was not changed. what about this time? we do not know yet but we do have to be ready.

Phil
 
There's something fundamentally wrong when game management policies are reduced to public opinion. Too often the public responds in a knee jerk manner, letting emotional arguments sway them, rather than giving thoughtful consideration to game numbers, natural mortality, predation, local genetics, and current food supplies. Hunters want to hunt, and tree huggers don't want anything hunted, but neither point of view is appropriate for all game in all locations, all of the time. Game populations, genetics, and sustainable harvests should be the focus of the exercise. When I purchase a hunting license, I like to think I'm participating in a sustainable harvest, and that all of the relevant data has been considered by those responsible for issuing the licenses, and that public opinion plays a minor role in the process. Everyone benefits from good management practices.
 
Mike,

you are right no decisions should be taken on feeling and/ or public opinion. i have no problem if for the sake of a game population there is a closure even on a long run. but for that it has to have science background: for grizzly or black bears no real studies has been done for years now.

during our last meetings in 2014 i asked how many bears are killed in DLP and by COs or RCMP a year so far no number has been reported. we have only the numbers of bears hunted and reported.

look the survey without filling it and you will see where they are heading ...

enjoy the day.

Phil

Grit did you got the wake up this morning at 5:32am?
 
I did, was driving to the gym when the vehicle got loose, thought I had a tire about to fall off...
my first thought was hell what did trump do now... followed by maybe an earthquake lol
 
the question 37 sums up all what is behind ...


37.
Would you oppose or support regulations to restrict roadside bear hunting in Yukon?
Strongly oppose

Oppose

Neutral

Support

Strongly support

Don't know
 
That question has "support the bear viewing/tour company" agenda all over it.

The YT seems to have a few perplexing regulations... don't get me started on the whole "no hunting within a km" rule. Being a fairly recent transplant to the YT, does Environment hold public forums for reg changes?

RC
 
That question has "support the bear viewing/tour company" agenda all over it.

The YT seems to have a few perplexing regulations... don't get me started on the whole "no hunting within a km" rule. Being a fairly recent transplant to the YT, does Environment hold public forums for reg changes?

RC

cant wait to see you when there will one.

first survey then public meeting ... you will hear the opponents we have to deal with .....

1km from dwelling is an interesting concept even is nobody lived for ever you cannot still shoot ....
 
1km from dwelling is an interesting concept even is nobody lived for ever you cannot still shoot ....

Its an asinine rule. Even in BC its only 100 meters. A friend of mine up here lost a big chunk of his trap line area because of it, some wing nut moved into a cabin with her free range dogs.

Oh I'll be at the public meeting if there is one! lol
 
Tuff, absolutely correct with the addon that it has to be a 'known OCCUPIED residence'. The BC regs also have areas of no hunting within boundaries of open hunting areas to accommodate areas that have a collection of rural dwellings but are not a village or whatever. What I am driving at is a blanket rule is not needed. Given the sparse population of the Yukon and a person wants a no shooting area around a collection of residences then they have to apply for it. Each situation is judged on its own merit and the regs have a map with detailed info on each specific area. This is one way to appease the earth muffin's concerns and avoid blanket rules. It would not change much as hunters aren't going to let fly around a house anyway and it pin points areas where there are occupied residences which is an added bonus for hunters unfamiliar with the area. They can find these places and avoid them. Just a thought for the locals to present when the anti's start waving blanket rules to trip up hunters.

QUOTE=Tuffcity;13795894]Its an asinine rule. Even in BC its only 100 meters. A friend of mine up here lost a big chunk of his trap line area because of it, some wing nut moved into a cabin with her free range dogs.

Oh I'll be at the public meeting if there is one! lol[/QUOTE]
 
for the Yukoners you should make an ATIPP request ...

h t t p s ://beta.gov.yk.ca/atipp-request-for-access-to-records

then getting the outfitter quotas: an eye opener ...
 
Its an asinine rule. Even in BC its only 100 meters. A friend of mine up here lost a big chunk of his trap line area because of it, some wing nut moved into a cabin with her free range dogs.

Oh I'll be at the public meeting if there is one! lol

there will be one. certainly a short notice ...
 
Back
Top Bottom