I have owned both, 2 totaly different feeling guns.
i could not get over how bulky the usp was, and i normaly a glock guy, so that says alot.
Id prob go with a sig if i have a chance to buy one or the other again.
bbb
x2
These are subjective things. If you want DAO or hammer-down carry, the 226 makes much more sense than the USP. If you want to carry cocked-and-locked, the USP is indicated (only because most 226 models are ruled out). The 226 feels very good to me, the 225 feels great, and the USP is just too big, for me. Both 226 and USP are too thick for practical CCW, IMO, where a Glock 19/23 or a short 1911 is an option. For magazines, parts, and service availability, the Glocks and the P226 are the clear leaders.
If you hold them, you'll know.
P225


















































