John Farnam's Quips - 26 Mar 2010 - "Rifle Set-up"

Wendell

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Uber Super GunNutz
Rating - 100%
83   0   2
http://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum/newthread.php?do=newthread&f=69

Rifle Set-up

26 Mar 10

Get your personal rifle, and get it set up, while you still can!

I've been asked about the "ideal rifle set-up."

I like a rifle that can be called upon to perform nearly any task a serious rifle can be expected to do, reasonably well, but that can't do any specific task perfectly. Rifles that are set up to do a single task perfectly, usually do all other tasks poorly. You can't have it both ways!

I like universal tools, not speciality tools, but that is just my opinion and personal preference.

So, here goes:

Caliber: It makes a lot of sense to have at least one rifle cambered for 223 (5.56x45). Far from the ideal, fighting caliber, but universally available (both in, and out, of the military supply system), and likely will be so for the foreseeable future.

Soviet/30 (7.62x39) and 6.8SPC both represent superlative choices. Much extended range and enhanced penetration when compared with the 223. For now, both are unavailable within the military supply system. However, both are generally available commercially, particularly 7.62x39.

308 (7.62x51) and 30-06 (7.62x63). These are the heavyweights, but they require big, heavy rifles, and the weight and bulk of the ammunition itself means that you'll be able to comfortably carry a good deal less of it than would be the case with any of the foregoing. Both calibers are generally available, albeit relatively expensive. When you weigh in, in excess of 165lbs, a rifle in one of these calibers may be just your ticket!

Other choices: Soviet/22 (5.54x39). Superior to the 223, but availability is a concern. Nearly all of it currently on-sale is imported. M1Carbine: Range-limited, but still a good choice. Readily available. FN's little 5.7X28 is also range-limited, but may represent a good choice for some. It is reasonably available, at least for now.

Rifle: We should all probably own at least one copy of the Stoner/AR. Maintenance-sensitive and generally inferior to most others listed below, still there are lots of spare parts available and lots of folks who can fix them. Best candidates are RRA, DSA, S&W, DPMS, Sabre-Tech

Other choices: Gas-piston rifles are superior to the Stoner System, for a host of reasons. For one, all are a good deal less maintenance-sensitive. Best candidates are RA/XCR, Berrett Ret-7, SA/M1A, FA/M14, Garand, DSA/FAL, Krebs/Kalashnikov, SIG/556. For all, I recommend a folding stock (when available), in order to facilitate low-profile transport.

The M1 Carbine is not exactly a "gas-piston" rifle, but it runs well. Short and handy, the best are available from Kahr and Fulton Armory. Since it uses a low-pressure round, flash-hiders are unnecessary. Likewise, Beretta's excellent CX4 Carbine, chambered for 9mm and 40S&W, is range and penetration-limited, but short, easy to use, and features low-recoil/noise/launch-signature, and, as with the M1 Carbine, does not require a flash-hider. Good choice for the small-statured.

Your fighting rifle needs to be short, slick, and handy. Things to be avoided include excessive length, snags, sharp corners and edges, and maladroit controls. Generally, extended/enlarged/ambidextrous controls create more problems than they "solve."

Rifles marked and marketed as "match" or "target" should be shunned like the plague! Military rifles need to have relatively loose chambers and other tolerances, so they will tolerate grit, dirt, and continuous neglect and lack of maintenance. Tightly tuned, target rifles will predictably go down in short order when exposed to "exigent" conditions. For our needs a general, utility, battle-rifle serves best. Accuracy, in relative terms, will never be better than mediocre.

Sights: The best set-up for your rifle is a full-length, top-rail, with side and bottom rails forward. Your rifle needs iron-sights, no matter what else you have! Best are Western-style, peep rear and front post. Yankee Hill, GG&G, Troy, and LaRue all make excellent examples, and all "fold-down" and out of the way when not needed. Those with good eyes may be able to use Soviet-style "pistol" sights, but these are generally inferior to peep sights.

Optics greatly improve speed and accuracy for many, but at the expense of extra bulk and battery issues in the case of some. Magnification is handy when one needs to make out downrange detail, but too much (more than 2.5X) leads to confusion and slow reactivity. Zero-magnification, "red-dots" generally represent the best combination of features. Aimpoint's T1 tops the list!

Aimpoints, Z-points, EOTechs, and others can be combined with a swing-out "magnifier," mounted, in tandem, on the top rail, behind the optic. This set-up provides optional magnification when required, but, again, at the expense of even additional bulk and "... yet another 'option' to clutter your mind!"

The Achilles' heel of all rifle-optics is frost! Most optics, even with cracked glass, still function normally. Fog can be quickly wiped away. But, a thick layer of frost on lenses, which often forms instantaneously and without warning, renders the optic temporarily useless, and frost cannot be wiped away readily. In addition, a frosted optic will simultaneously render back-up, iron sights (when mounted in-line) also unusable!

So, all rifle-optics need to be attached to the top-rail via a quick-release mount that will allow the Operator to instantly take the frosted optic off his rifle, deploy his iron sights, and get back into the fight without delay. When the emergency subsides, the (now clean) optic can be quickly re-mounted, and iron sights re-folded. With modern rails and mounts, re-zeroing is unnecessary. Best quick-release mounts are made by LaRue.

Optics need to be forward-mounted, away from the Operator's face. That way, the Operator can easily look around the optic, as well as through it. Most red-dots and scout-scops are not eye-relief-critical, so they can be mounted virtually anywhere on the top rail.

Slings: To be truly useful, your fighting rifle must be equipped with a sling! One-point slings are currently the rage, but, for all-day carry, a two-point sling is hard to beat. Blue-Force Gear's Vicker's Sling tops the list.

Finally, your rifle needs a co-axial flashlight, forward-mounted on the right, forward rail (for right-handers). Surefire, Insight, and Laser-Devices all make excellent candidates. Minimum strength is 120 lumens. A co-axial flashlight will make your sights (optical and iron) useable in low-light and instantly provide you with the critical information you will need in order to make well-grounded decisions with regard to the use of deadly-force. Indispensable on a serious rifle!

Other options, like vertical forends, must always be evaluated balancing tangible benefits (not just, "it looks ###y") versus concrete liabilities, mostly additional bulk/weight, fragility, the likelihood of it coming loose, and its potential to interfere with vital tasks/procedures.

Your rifle, even when properly equipped, is still mostly useless until it is sighted in! You must have complete faith in your sight settings, and in your ability to precisely apply them to the challenge at hand, or your next fight will undoubtably go badly! Most rifles enumerated above should be set so that they are dead-on at forty meters. So zeroed, your rifle will be, for all practical purposes, dead-on for any target between twenty-five and seventy-five meters, and within two inches all the way out past two-hundred meters.

Once zeroed, re-zero every chance you get! Constantly re-confirm your zero, particularly when traveling with the weapon and after changing brands of ammunition or bullet weights. When the Test comes, you don't want to be wondering about the validity of your zero. By the same token, don't "lend" your rifle to other people. They may decide to "adjust" your sights without telling you! With regard to your rifle's zero, "When there is doubt, there is no doubt!"

This represents a real problem for many police departments, in that it is ever-convenient for officers to "share" rifles. It may be convenient, but it is a can of worms! Individual rifles need to be issued to individual officers, and an officer's individual rifle needs to ever-remain with him, and he needs to take, and accept, complete responsibility for it, and for his competence with it. Anything less invites disaster!

Shoot your rifle! Get rounds downrange every chance you get, in order to confirm your zero (as noted above) and also to confirm that the weapon is running normally. Field-strip, clean, inspect, and lubricate it. Then, reassemble it and shoot it again!

When the Test comes, you'll be supremely confident, and ready!

/John

created by dti@clouds.com

Copyright © 2010 by DTI, Inc. All rights reserved.
created on Friday March 26, 2010 23:59:1 MDT
http://www.defense-training.com/quips/26Mar10.html
 
7.62 x 39 having much extended range over .223? Just something that jumped out at me. That and the AR platform being inferior to all the piston rifles. I thought that school of thought was pretty much done by now.
 
Ahh the good old "The M14 is the best gun ever made and the 5.56 is only good for gophers" rant.

7.62x39 extended range? 5.54x39 being far superior? M1 Carbine as a "fighting rifle"? Cx4 vs an AR or AK?
Sounds like terrible advice all around.
Ill pass on this one...
 
How is checking your zero "bollocks"? A rifle that doesn't shoot where you aim it doesn't do you much good.

I'm not sure how 5.45x39mm is better or how 7.62x39mm has greatly enhanced range than the .223, though.
 
I feel stupider for reading that article...
But Kevin, he can't be wrong, he got all his info from the internets!


Honestly, I could see someone who has never fired a gun writing that. It seems to be all the usual rehashed internet rumblings and general opinions.
 
Caliber: It makes a lot of sense to have at least one rifle cambered for 223 (5.56x45). Far from the ideal, fighting caliber, but universally available (both in, and out, of the military supply system), and likely will be so for the foreseeable future.

Soviet/30 (7.62x39) and 6.8SPC both represent superlative choices. Much extended range and enhanced penetration when compared with the 223. For now, both are unavailable within the military supply system. However, both are generally available commercially, particularly 7.62x39.

308 (7.62x51) and 30-06 (7.62x63). These are the heavyweights, but they require big, heavy rifles, and the weight and bulk of the ammunition itself means that you'll be able to comfortably carry a good deal less of it than would be the case with any of the foregoing. Both calibers are generally available, albeit relatively expensive. When you weigh in, in excess of 165lbs, a rifle in one of these calibers may be just your ticket!

This is generally in-line with my thinking, except for the bolded (which I think is ill-conceived).

The 6.8SPC is so hard to find right now that it'd be foolish to depend on it for a 'stash' unless you're LOADED... but my stash consists of a few K of .223/5.56x45 (and I reload more whenever I can on my Dillon Super 1050), an assload of 7.62x39 (Czech surplus), and .308/7.62x51 (SA packs, and I load on the Super 1050).

The rest of the article is just straight bunk... like a mall ninja had ### ### with Elmer Fudd and Fudd's next crap had a sentient thought which became the text.

I agree with KevinB - I feel stupider for having read the rest.

-M
 
If it makes you feel any better, have some puppies.

[youtube]Dsg8JccRZCw[/youtube]

They're about as relevant to firearms as that article. :D

Yeah....but watching them scrabble across the floor a few times did wonders to flush the turds floating around my mental 'bowl after having read the article........
 
Being a mall ninja's actually fun

:D This was actually entertaining to write.


Caliber selection:

Do not get too hung up on calibers. Every bullet has to the potential to be lethal, even the anemic 22 Long Rifle. Your rifle selection should instead dictate what caliber you go with rather then what caliber you want dictating what rifle you choose. Shot placement and follow up shots can cover for almost any perceived deficiency in any center fire rifle cartridge.

What you should do however is select ammunition that maximizes the damage to tissue, regardless of caliber. NATO countries have their hands tied in that they can only use full metal jacket ammunition. As a civilian, you’re under no such silly conventions. Good hunting ammo can and will increase the lethality of your rifle regardless of caliber over full metal jackets. Hornady, Barnes, Nosler, and a host of other have an extensive selection of bullets designed specifically to drop medium sized game (or two legged varmints). There is only one important caveat, and that it must reliably load into and cycle your rifle, and you must be able to get a good large supply of it.

Also consider other factors that are directly influenced by your caliber choice. For instance 6.8 SPC, 6.5 Grendal, and all those fun calibers look fantastic on paper until you realize that finding magazines for those cartridges is a royal pain in the ass. For bolt actions, that’s a moot point but if you’re looking at an AR15 or similar system, then it’s a huge issue. For any rifle you choose, make sure you can get at least 4 spare magazines on hand, but as always, the more, the merrier.

Take into consideration how you’re going to haul those magazines. A good MOLLE vest with enough magazine pouches and a dump pouch becomes a godsend when bullets are flying every which way and you’re smack in the middle. At the very least buy a pouch that you can carry two mags snugly in on your belt or rifle butt stock, because I will say this right now; carrying spare mags in your pocket will not work. I have tried this. I have also failed miserably while trying this.

As a small aside, AR15 magazine pouches are common and available from every good gear manufacturer. More exotic magazine pouches for the G36 or Swiss Arms rifles are going to be harder to come by. And don’t try to use eagle industries M16 pouches for them. Or any STANAG pouch that uses elastic retention. Those little hooks that let you snap mags together will invariably get snagged on that elastic and you WILL cuss every time they do.


Rifle selection:
Pick a rifle that you would be able to sling on your shoulder and carry for hours on end, perhaps days on end. Make sure it’ll go bang every time you pull the trigger. Everything else is secondary to those. The ideal rifles IMO are the AR15 and the CZ858 in Canada, but that’s not to say Swiss Arms, Norc M14s, SKSes, and all others aren’t just as valid. I just put AR15 at the top because along with good reliability it’s essentially the single most modular and popular rifle platforms in North America today. If I lived in South Africa or the Middle East, then probably an AK would be the weapon of choice seeing as how they’re practically everywhere and can be had at a street corner. Different locales, different priorities, different choice.

Above all else, no matter what rifle you choose, remember the Rifleman’s Creed:

This is my rifle. There are many like it, but this one is mine. It is my life. I must master it as I must master my life. Without me, my rifle is useless. Without my rifle, I am useless. I must fire my rifle true. I must shoot straighter than my enemy who is trying to kill me.

My rifle and I know that what counts in this war are not the rounds we fire, the noise of our burst, nor the smoke we make. We know that it is the hits that count. We will hit.

My rifle is human, even as I am human, because it is my life. Thus, I will learn it as a brother. I will learn its weaknesses, its strengths, its parts, its accessories, its sights and its barrel. I will ever guard it against the ravages of weather and damage as I will ever guard my legs, my arms, my eyes and my heart against damage.

I will keep my rifle clean and ready just as I am clean and ready. We will become part of each other.


Keep those words to heart, and any rifle you pick up will serve you well.


Sights:

Can’t comment, I usually use irons for my airsoft rifles and my real steel sports a 5-25x scope. I’d occasionally used a red dot and I can see their use but I’m most comfortable with the irons that have a glow-in-the-dark nail polish on it. KevinB, NavyShooter, and Hungry would probably be much more qualified to answer anything about optics and sights.

And before you say anything… I’ve heard every joke about the nail polish, gotten every funny look, but god dammit, it works!


Slings:

I’ve used just about everything from a homemade one point made of arts and craft ribbon (hey it actually worked pretty well. :p ) to a Specter Gear 3 point and just about everything in between. Instead of making any specific recommendation I’ll just talk about what I found.

1 point sling:
They attach to the rifle near the back on a single loop. For small and short weapons such as PDWs and very short barreled AR15s (10.5”) then these are ideal. Loose enough not to get tangled on gear, snug enough to keep the weapon on you at all times. You could cross shoulders without any hassle at all and when you had to get it out of the way you pulled down on the top shoulder strap and moved the weapon to your back.. Once done doing whatever, you reached behind and pulled the weapon forward again.

Now for anything longer then a P90 then you start having issues when moving the rifle aside, as the muzzle will dig into the ground and if you’re crouched can lead to some pretty noisy and uncomfortable situations. If you’re really tall you may be able to get away with a 14.5” AR15.

2 point sling:
These attach on the fore and back of the rifle, and depending on how they’re setup can be quite flexible. However the standard mountings on most rifles are on the bottom so that leads to all sorts of problems when carrying. The original philosophy as far as I can tell was that you’re not supposed to wear the sling when in combat.

This is solved mostly by getting mounts that go to a specific side, left of the rifle for right handed shooters and vice versa, either by soft adaptors that didn’t change the rifle or hardware mounted. However for the longest time this also limited it’s use in combat as if you had the sling loose enough to use in close quarters, it became loose enough to let the rifle flop around uncomfortably when you let go of it, and if you kept it tight enough not to, good luck trying to bring the rifle up on your weak shoulder.

Mind you, this issue has mostly been addressed by the Blue Force Gear Vickers Combat Sling. The slidy thing on the front (very technical term) makes adjusting the sling to a proper length in seconds, so it’s quickly adaptable to almost any situation. If I was drafted into the CF tomorrow I’d probably buy myself a Vicker’s and put it on my rifle when I shipped out (pending CO approval of course. :D )

3 point slings:
These have two attach points like on a 2 point, but instead of the two ends attaching there, the sling starts at the front, snakes through the rear loop and comes around again to attach to a third point on the sling itself.

The biggest advantage and the reason it self so popular for a while was with the third attachment point was designed so that if you released the buckle or lever there then it would slide back along the length that rang along the rifle to turn the sling into a 1 point very quickly. It made for a good woodland patrol sling while being acceptable when going into closer quarters in built up areas.

A lot of people don’t like 3 points for whatever reason. I’m comfortable with them and wouldn’t think twice to use a good 3 point. Properly done, the loop has to be snug under your strong armpit and over your weak shoulder and shouldn’t move all that much. However if you had pouches on the upper half of vest then they became a nuisance and at worst would snag the sling.

They do have their up points, however in my opinion the Vickers is a simpler and more elegant solution to the same problem in a slings. Plenty of folk I know run a 3 point with a chest rig in the summer. Plus the 3 point does seem to allow to carry the rifle more comfortably on longer foot patrols then a two point. Why I’ve always been at a loss to explain, might have to do with the way the loop distributes the weight but I have no scientific reason to believe this.

General tips for a sling:

Buy a sling that’s as wide as you can get away with. The wider straps allow the weight to be distributed on the shoulder over a wider area and makes for less fatigue over time, a big plus when you’re rifle weighs 7 or 8 kilograms. I use a homemade 2” wide strap made of a softer but thick nylon to haul that gun around, and it’s a lot more comfortable then the store bought 1” that I used and ended up with a sore shoulder with at the end of the day. Conversely (and somewhat perversely) the wide slings seem to have the magical ability to get themselves twisted more easily so you’re also wasting time trying to keep them straightened out. Best advice I can really give for a sling is to just look at what’s available, imagine if you could use it, buy it and then use it. If it’s not right, wash it and sell it on the internet and try another sling. You’ll probably be out $20 or $40 all said done along with the price of the sling you finally settle on but trial and error are the only real way to find out if a certain sling is right for you.

Avoid the comfort pads that slide onto a sling. If you’re getting a sore shoulder from your sling then a comfort pad will do nothing but put another layer of nylon between the sling and your shoulder. However the pad will slide around on your shoulder, get in the way of your gear, and generally make itself a nuisance. If you need a pad then buy one that’s been made as a part of a sling rather then just added as an afterthought on.


Accessories:

Eeeeeehhhh… I do like vertical fore grips but I can get along just fine without, it’s more comfy to hold up and maneuver.

Flashlights is a fun can of worms. I can see the fantastic tactical potential but if I had a dollar for every time someone used on incorrectly at an airsoft game, I’d never have to buy another slurpee out of my own pocket again.

I’ve seen someone actually stick the flashlight around the corner (he didn’t look) and turn it on. Rightly so he got shot in the hand. When I asked him about it later he said he thought it would blind the other side.

That and other similar incidents do happen when people read that you can use a flashlight to blind someone in the dark, but it’s a two edged sword IMO, as it also gives away your position and destroys your night vision as well. Every time I see a flashlight go off pointing the opposite direction of where it’s supposed to be point, my first immediate though usually amounts to, “Oh, we shoot that way!” Got to the point where I don’t bother with flashlights anymore for airsoft anymore (I still have my EDC light on me, but it stays in a pocket or pouch).

Now like I said, if I bothered to take a low light combat course then most likely my opinion would change, and I’m not a professional that does this for a living, so if someone that does do this for living says that a weapon mounted light is indispensible then I’ll believe them. Till then, I’m going to avoid using the, “Shoot me!” signal.

Right. Bring the fire boys, I've faced the hell of 4chan while you were all out having a life!! I can take you all ooooooooon!!! :D :D :D
 
Back
Top Bottom