I believe they're the same gun, the only difference is the Color.This question is to all the Kel Tec Su-16 FX owners. What is your honest opinion of this rifle? The feel, shooting, strengths and weaknesses? There's allot of opinions and reviews on the Su-16 but not the FX model.
Sorry if I'm being bothersome , I was gonna get the FX , but because of the barrel issue I got a SU16, the body kits that you buy for the SU16 are the same kit that's on the FX.They have a whole different body kit. How does the whole FX package work, re-act while firing, use of magazines, does it feel cheap etc?
First let me say, there's a lot of haters of theSU16. I had about a thousand rnds through mine, maybe one stove pipe , or ftf , that's it. I found it ran very reliable using the lar 15 mags. As for accuracy , I could group the shots about a 3 or 4 inch circle, using AE 55G black box, 5x Fixed scope. I had zero issues until I messed up the barrel ( my fault). I sold it recently because of Kel Tec lack of support for second owners.Don't worry about bothersome, it's great to get an opinion on these rifles. Thanks. Does it shoot well and feel reliable?
my SU16 had .223 stamped on the barrel, s I called KelTec and was td that the rifle is chambered in 5.56, but stamped .223 for export into Canada, I would say that you have the same barrel. You should call KelTec to verify this for yourself.Thanks for the info. I hear and see advertised that the normal SU-16 can use both 5.56 and 223. But the SU-16 FX is advertised only 223, why is that?
I'm thinking of buying one of these, and I know I'm not the only one. There's not allot informational reviews out there of the FX, so this is why I'm asking. We can educate each other. Thanks for those who have contributed.
they're all fake, even the real ones.Thanks for the feed back, I've heard there are allot if fake ones out there. Then they have allot of problems, so I heard you have to buy it from an actual Kel Tec dealer to get the real one. So I heard!
they are cool looking and reliable, maybe the barrel is thicker , to accommodate the comp, which would keep the muzzle rise down. ( maybe).I have both an SU16 and an SU16FX (yeah I should get rid of one..) The FX is a little heavier, seems to have a beefier barrel maybe. I notice less muzzle rise with the FX than the reglar SU16. I like the FX mostly because of the looks - my wife immediately thought it was cool and I thought well, that can't be bad! It's a fun gun to shoot - I've had no issues with FTP or FTE and regularly use it with LAR15 and beowolf magazines.
The red dot that is included with the FX is a piece of garbage. It looks good but washes out in the daylight and has popped open spilling the batteries while shooting more than once. I'm swapping it for another red-dot.
I like the idea of the foldable SU16 original version and I'm tempted to hang onto it for that reason, but honestly I grab the FX for pure non-restricted bang-bang joy.
I have both an SU16 and an SU16FX (yeah I should get rid of one..) The FX is a little heavier, seems to have a beefier barrel maybe. I notice less muzzle rise with the FX than the reglar SU16. I like the FX mostly because of the looks - my wife immediately thought it was cool and I thought well, that can't be bad! It's a fun gun to shoot - I've had no issues with FTP or FTE and regularly use it with LAR15 and beowolf magazines.
The red dot that is included with the FX is a piece of garbage. It looks good but washes out in the daylight and has popped open spilling the batteries while shooting more than once. I'm swapping it for another red-dot.
I like the idea of the foldable SU16 original version and I'm tempted to hang onto it for that reason, but honestly I grab the FX for pure non-restricted bang-bang joy.