KRISS Buttstock Mockup
- Thread starter Armafield
- Start date
Blastattack
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Winnipeg MB
Yeah, and Prohib. Cute idea, but don't pursue it too far.
- Location
- East of Home, West of the Rest
Actually it wouldn't be a bullpup stock. It would be a pistol grip with a linkage bar added to the shroud and a butt pad added to the receiver. If I'm looking at it right.
Still, not about if you could but rather if you should. Kriss Vectors are awesome as is.
May be reverse the direction of the buffer is currently going. Instead of pointing down it should be pointing up. If you have a blow back buffer pointing down at the very very end of the stock each shot will likely send your muzzle flip up more.
Nope. Stock.
"2 Any rifle, shotgun or carbine stock of the type known as the “bull-pup” design, being a stock that, when combined with a firearm, reduces the overall length of the firearm such that a substantial part of the reloading action or the magazine-well is located behind the trigger of the firearm when it is held in the normal firing position."
That being said, I wonder if they would call a metal rod holding the action back there a stock because it puts the action behind the trigger?
- Location
- East of Home, West of the Rest
Hopefully not, or any device like a tavor would be in trouble. The key word is "stock". Device as a word isn't even used in that section.
- Location
- East of Home, West of the Rest
An internal piece not used for holding the gun isn't a stock.
so would the buttpad added to the back of the receiver be considered a bullpup stock?
No, because the butt pad isn't what makes the bullpup layout.
Do a good write up of exactly what you want to do, then send it along with pictures, CAD drawings, photoshop mockups, and documentation of the law, and how this would not be a stock... rather a reconfiguration of the rifle as it is.
Then send that to the firearms technician in Ottawa, and they will give you a yes or no.
With email proof from the RCMP lab, you are good to go if you decide to proceed.
I spoke with them not long ago, and they are pretty nice people, that were very helpful with regards to a barrel question I had.
Then send that to the firearms technician in Ottawa, and they will give you a yes or no.
With email proof from the RCMP lab, you are good to go if you decide to proceed.
I spoke with them not long ago, and they are pretty nice people, that were very helpful with regards to a barrel question I had.
freekshow001
Regular
- Location
- Victoria, BC
Good luck with this, i always like to see new things. I think the legality of this depends on your wording, your title says this is a bullpup design and than in your topic your trying to explain to people that its not a bullpup design but just a receiver with a linkage bar. In your above statement that you copied and pasted it says bullpup design which yours is and will be prohibited
Apparently, the bullpup design would not be a problem, only the bullpup conversion (for some reason harder to understand).
So, this arm was not created as a bullpup design, and yet when the trigger is moved forward it now looks like a bullpup conversion, which would be a problem, if we get the meaning of the law correctly.
Of course I could be wrong. ;-)
So, this arm was not created as a bullpup design, and yet when the trigger is moved forward it now looks like a bullpup conversion, which would be a problem, if we get the meaning of the law correctly.
Of course I could be wrong. ;-)
If it was legal to proceed (and only then), I would consider using piano wire to link a trigger to the rear. Such a link would work in tension, of course, and could be inserted in a plastic sleeve if need be. RC modeling control rods might also work.
such that a substantial part of the reloading action or the magazine-well is located behind the trigger of the firearm when it is held in the normal firing position
i think thats the killer right there... but i guess yea never know
