Super Scout said:
Has any one used or experimented with lead bullets in a rifle ie: 358 Winchester? I'm interested in what velocities you happened to attain with which powders. What sould one look at for top velocities in lead bullets out of a rifle?
I shoot a lot of .35 pistol bullets out of our .35 caliber rifles. There are times when I'm just too lazy to cast, size and lube, heat treat, etc., so I shoot either bulk lead bullets bought for PPC competition or look for boxes of jacketed bullets that are being sold with factory blemishes. More than adequate for practice and gopher hunting.
You seem to be focused on velocity. You can get higher velocities with lead bullets - Tom Gray was cleaning house in cast bullet benchrest matches with a .308 and velocities above 2500 fps. I believe his groups were around .2 MOA... Most of the cast bullet benchresters seem to settle on loads around 2000 fps.
HOWEVER, the faster you drive cast bullets in rifles, the more demanding it becomes to retain accuracy and not have leading. Generally speaking, I would say there are three primary requirements.
- Bullet hardness. Bullet hardness has to be matched to the operating pressure of the load you are using. Water quenching bullets or using linotype can help, but there is an element of chance on whether the hardness will be within the range requred - bullets can be too hard, as well as too soft. I prefer to heat treat bullets in the oven for a predetermined time at a predetermined temperature. I use an LBT hardness tester, and this seems to work for me.
- Bullet fit. The bullet needs to closely fit the ball seat/leade. It doesn't matter what the bullet size is in relation to the bore - what matters is that the bullet fits the seat/leade very tightly. If gases can get around the bullet in the seat/leade at the time of firing, you will get gas cutting and blowby in the time between the bullet leaving the case mouth and obdurating in the bore. I have my grandfather's old 1895 Winchester in 30 US; I could size those bullets four thou over bore diameter and they still wouldn't be as big as they should be. Sized .316, it shoots extremely well. The seriously competitive cast bullet benchresters use swaging dies that are a match to the profile of their chamber - they swage their cast bullets to a precise fit in the swaging die prior to loading.
So don't worry about bullet size versus bore size - when the bright light appears behind the bullet, trust me: they will size down to whatever the bore diameter is when they get there. I slug my lead/chambers, measure them up (or get them measured in the case of a barrel with an odd number of lands), and then get a sizing die ground as required. Robert Stillwell does excellent work in this regard, and his turnaround time is very good.
- bullet design. Spitzer bullets, sadly, just don't seem to do that well. There's assorted theories on this, but the bottom line is the accuracy boys and the mould makers who cater to them like Eagan (who just passed away this spring) use very blunt nosed bullets with long bearing surfaces.
This is a bullet I designed for cast bullet competition; it worked so well that I scaled it up to .35. It is pretty typical of competition type designs, and that big flat meplat also makes this kind of design pretty good for hunting as well.
Other than all the above, it seems that the bigger the caliber of the bullet, the easier it is to get acceptable results.