Did not see if the EAL is in there.
http://photos.imageevent.com/badger...uals/2002 No.4 Parts Identification List .pdf
http://photos.imageevent.com/badger...uals/2002 No.4 Parts Identification List .pdf
in that case a big thanks to you big ed ... and DND for preparing it.that I donated to Badgers website
Agreed - AFAIK the NSN convention has been 13 digits not 12 since the beginning. Would be interesting to find out what the real NSN is for the EAL - or alternatively determine if one never existed. Thanks again.The 8-8 number below is 'odd' and normally would be three numbers without the dash, see link below.
NOTE: I have never seen an American NSN with a "dash" in place of a real number and I worked 38 years at a military depot.
BINGO!!! Thanks very much Sten Collector ... that sure provides a better picture into the provenance of the "EAL" from DND's perspective. The fact that they were given their own serial numbers is of interest. I am wondering if the numbers came from CAL rather than "Essential Agencies Ltd" ... which in my simple mind equates to CAL as the manufacturer .. oh well maybe just semantics at this point.I just had a look at the PDF which started this thread, and the EAL is listed on page 2-5 as item number 2-1-1
BINGO!!! Thanks very much Sten Collector ... that sure provides a better picture into the provenance of the "EAL" from DND's perspective. The fact that they were given their own serial numbers is of interest. I am wondering if the numbers came from CAL rather than "Essential Agencies Ltd" ... which in my simple mind equates to CAL as the manufacturer .. oh well maybe just semantics at this point.
BTW thanks BadgerDog (dachshund?) for the links!! The internet sure is grand!
Would be interesting to find the RCAF "Engineering Order" 30-65FE to see what it specifies
no - was thinking (or at least I am under the impression that) most "sporterized" No.4's retain their original arsenal serial number. The EAL's - who's receivers were obviously produced at an arsenal - received their own serial numbers.I am not sure what you mean by "their own serial numbers". Are you referring to the Nato Stock Number
they were B class, which was somewhat unusual for a weapon, as weapons were usually S class (accounted for by serial number).
I just checked the fiche again, and you are right for that time period. FNs, etc are all simply B class. I believe that they later changed weapons over to S class, around the late 90s. I seem to recall where a supply computer check could tell you what unit held a certain serial number, or you could list all the serials of a certain stock number for a unit.curious .. I have heard of Class A, B, C and D stores ... can't say I am familiar with Class S ... Generally a serialized item that went missing caused a Board of Inquiry ...eg class A and most of class B. I don't think weapons classified as "B" is unusual
this would be known as the Mapping and Charting Establishment and part of the Canadian Military Engineers afaikare with the military mapping division



























