Lee Enfield - how to tell ex sportster

Horilka

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 99.7%
395   1   0
Location
Toronto, ON
I'm relatively new to the LE so the question I have - is there any way to tell that the stock is not original to the rifle as in "restored". Or even maybe there's a way to tell FTRed stock vs original? As far as I understand No1 MkIII and No4 Mk1 did not have serial on the stock, am I correct?
 
I'm going to bump this thread up to the top and join in with my own little question. What is the comparision or differences between No 1 MkIII
and the No4 Mk1, these two seem to be the most common and I am going to limit myself to just one LE, which should I get?:wave:
 
Parts (especially the wood) are much easier to find for the No4 rifle. Much easier to restore the #4 rifle.
Biggest difference between the No1 & the No4 is location of the rear sight. On the No1 it is mounted on the barrel ......... on the No4 it is on the receiver.
 
I'm relatively new to the LE so the question I have - is there any way to tell that the stock is not original to the rifle as in "restored". Or even maybe there's a way to tell FTRed stock vs original? As far as I understand No1 MkIII and No4 Mk1 did not have serial on the stock, am I correct?

All depends. I have a Long Branch that has the serial # stamped into the underside front of the fore end.
 
Most No1's are close or even older than 100 years... so the wood is a good indication if it as been restored. If it looks new or fairly new chances are it is.
Bumps and gauges are plentiful on a rifle that went through 2 wars.
Although like anything else with Lee Enfield's there are exceptions...

Also early No1's had the volley sight and the stocks have a bump or ''potbelly'' that newer or reproduction do not have.

Some No1's do have the serrial number on the forend, near the stacking swivel, on the underside.
 
For a SMLE if the serial number on the nose cap matches you can be confident it's not desporterised.
 
Back
Top Bottom