Leopold Mk 4 vs Burris XTR Tactical

I've got a Mark 4 and am happy. I've never used an XTR but I've had lots of good experience with other Burris products.

The presence of trace amounts of Milspec will be the deciding factor.
 
I used to have a Burris XTR. I hate where they placed the turrets on scope. Makes placing the scope on the rifle for proper eye relief a pain in the ***. IMHO, the Leupy is a better scope. If you can swing it though, I'd go for a Night Force
 
BigUglyMan said:
The presence of trace amounts of Milspec will be the deciding factor.
Click to expand...

BUM, you're the best.

To the O/P, look into the level and quality of service offered by either company for Canadians. Maybe some people here can share their experiences (I don't have either brand, but it's well worth the price to have excellent service).
 
i got a burris xtr 3-12 its a great scope. like the life time warrenty, scope placement is kinda weird and looks weird without the sunshade it comes with.

other than that i love it.

i would expect the big difference between the two would be the glass quality.
 
both great optics, leupold has better warranty service. i would buy the leupy based on that advantage
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom