If you want to get snippy about ‘Enfields’ and ‘Lee Enfields’ a Enfield can refer to a lot of different rifles and patterns. Such as a P53 Enfield rifle musket, a Enfield revolver, a P14, a Snider Enfield, etc. it was simply the arms manufacturer which established many of the patterns for the British military. As such it became part of the name of many of the arms produced there.First off, Long Branch, in Ontario during WWII, never made "Enfield" rifles - they made "Lee Enfield" rifles - very different machines. The "Enfield" rifles here were designated P14 (in 303 British) and Model of 1917 (in 30-06) at the time - they were made in three factories in USA - Eddystone, Remington and Winchester. I have a receiver and bolt only for a P13, which I think was an earlier Enfield rifle that was made in Great Britain. Generally, books by Ian Skinnerton about various Lee Enfield rifles are somewhat authorative, although there were other authors like Charles Stratton, etc. As far as a reference specifically about Long Branch production - I do not know - but I am sure someone on here will give you a lead. The No. 4 Mk.1* was also made by Savage during WWII, in USA - there are some stories that various parts were swapped among the two North American factories - although NO Mk. 1* versions were made by the various Armouries in Great Britain. The Savage made Lee Enfields will often have "US Property" stamped on the left side receiver rail, if the rifle was made after probably 1942 - although those rifles were never used by USA military - they were loaned or given to Allies - most commonly to Great Britain. The Charles Stratton book here lists 7 factory names used by rifle makers around the world that made No. 4 rifles, and 9 variations of action bodies that were made - the Long Branch factory made 2 action body variations - a Mk.1 and a Mk.1*. Canadian Arsenal Ltd. was a successor company to Long Branch.
Skennerton still sells the book. Bought another copy direct from him last month for MSRP. He even autographed it. The online places have crazy prices.The Lee Enfield - A Century of Lee-Metford & Lee-Enfield Rifles & Carbines by Skennerton. Covers all models/years/manufacturers, etc etc.
Hardcover
Pretty much the Enfield Bible,
Pricey if you can find one. out of print.
British Enfield Rifles Vol 2 by Stratton.
Softcover
Also out of print but easier to find and less $$. Can find on Amazon for less than $50.
Very useful for parts ID by year and series
Milsurps.com enfield forum > Gunboards.The big Skennerton book is far and away the best reference. Haven't had mine off the shelf in a while but I think it has a chapter on Canadian production. It's a very detailed history of the Lee Enfield rifles but even it won't answer all collector questions. For that you need to join a good forum like "Gunboards." Post photos or questions there and you'll get lots of discussion.
milsurpo
Skennerton also has some glaring blunders. He wrote that pre-interweb and could not confirm all the statements he had in front of him. For example, No.4 Mk I* (T) and No.32 scopes were never made in or assembled or anything'ed in Sherbrooke, Quebec.The big Skennerton book is far and away the best reference. Haven't had mine off the shelf in a while but I think it has a chapter on Canadian production. It's a very detailed history of the Lee Enfield rifles but even it won't answer all collector questions. For that you need to join a good forum like "Gunboards." Post photos or questions there and you'll get lots of discussion.
milsurpo
If you have a Long Branch, learn the differences between the Mk I and the Mk I*. The Canadian rifles get slagged by Brit' writers for all sorts of reasons, not necessarily always well founded.Thank you all for the replies, I have gone ahead and ordered Skennerton‘s “The Lee Enfield” as well as Stratton’s “British Enfield Rifles” Vol 2.
My ‘44 Longbranch should be here Wednesday and I’m looking forward to referencing the books and researching all that I can about my new to me rifle.
Thanks for that.If you have a Long Branch, learn the differences between the Mk I and the Mk I*. The Canadian rifles get slagged by Brit' writers for all sorts of reasons, not necessarily always well founded.
If you want a definitive document, I recommend doing some internet sleuthing for the last issue Canadian Forces CNo.4 rifle manuals. My 78-page digital example is dated 1991. Search for a Word document C-71-111-000/MM-000, "FIRST LINE MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONS .... ", and the title continues with all the applicable marks. It even has a section on tuning competition rifles, with diagrams for the concealed improvements, and No.4(T) telescope adjustments with a diagram of the reticle movement at scale distances.
I've got the following DND docs from 2002If you have a Long Branch, learn the differences between the Mk I and the Mk I*. The Canadian rifles get slagged by Brit' writers for all sorts of reasons, not necessarily always well founded.
If you want a definitive document, I recommend doing some internet sleuthing for the last issue Canadian Forces CNo.4 rifle manuals. My 78-page digital example is dated 1991. Search for a Word document C-71-111-000/MM-000, "FIRST LINE MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONS .... ", and the title continues with all the applicable marks. It even has a section on tuning competition rifles, with diagrams for the concealed improvements, and No.4(T) telescope adjustments with a diagram of the reticle movement at scale distances.