Looking for a Derringer

Apply for access to the Equipment Exchange and look in the Antique,black powder and modern muzzle loader section. They are not cheap and the ammo is next to impossible to get.
Or you could get a modern Snake Slayer which is not antique and quite a bit bigger..also restricted.
 
I guess my only real option is a Snake Slayer since the .22 magnum is prohibited. Getting married in a month and thought it would make a great gift for my best man. If anyone can track down a used one for around $250 would be awesome. Thanks for the info guys, cheers.
 
Last edited:
???? Can someone tell me when .22 magnum became prohibited????

I think he meant that the .22 magnum Derringer in the EE is prohibited, not the caliber itself.

Also, one question mark is sufficient. Multiple punctuation doesn't make your question any better or more significant.
 
I think he meant that the .22 magnum Derringer in the EE is prohibited, not the caliber itself.

Also, one question mark is sufficient. Multiple punctuation doesn't make your question any better or more significant.

Hmmm. I'm surprised that the punctuation in front of the sentence didn't bother you more than the mentioned multiples. Normally the anal retentive, A.D.D. types like yourself mention what disturbs them most right off the bat!?...{darn it! I did it again, didn't I?}...Hang on; I'm positive that multiple punctuation does in fact make the sentence more significant! An exclamation mark in front of a question mark (multiples} leads the reader to interpret that the question has significance, so much so that the question is "exclaimed".
Which segues to another observation and question. What drives internet, anal retentive, A.D.D. types nuttier faster, incorrect punctuation, or being proved wrong? Feel free to enlighten.
 
Hmmm. I'm surprised that the punctuation in front of the sentence didn't bother you more than the mentioned multiples. Normally the anal retentive, A.D.D. types like yourself mention what disturbs them most right off the bat!?...{darn it! I did it again, didn't I?}...Hang on; I'm positive that multiple punctuation does in fact make the sentence more significant! An exclamation mark in front of a question mark (multiples} leads the reader to interpret that the question has significance, so much so that the question is "exclaimed".
Which segues to another observation and question. What drives internet, anal retentive, A.D.D. types nuttier faster, incorrect punctuation, or being proved wrong? Feel free to enlighten.

I think you mean O.C.D. As in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, whereas A.D.D means Attention Deficit Disorder. Also, the punctuation in front of the sentence is something that I've always liked about Espanol; it informs you of the nature of the sentence before you get to the end.

And the exclamation combined with a question mark is known as an Interrobang. It's the proper way to show surprise while asking a question. And multiple periods are known as an Ellipsis.

So, I'll answer your question... when you've proven me wrong.
 
Back
Top Bottom