Is the new Remington 700 worse than an older Remington 700. I know that for Remington 870s, a lot of folks recommend the older ones I was wondering if it’s the same with 700s. Any thoughts on this?
Machining wise they are made on new tooling and tighter tolerances and there is no reason they will not shoot as well or better than old rifles.
Finish wise, like in terms of bluing, polish etc the old ones are better...but the newer CDLs and pre current Rem Arms BDLs are still dang nice.
There's no reason to think your rifle won't work great and be a shooter, given the numbers they've turned out. Get one, slap a TriggerTech in it, and go shoot!
Thanks so much, this is super helpful! In that case I won’t be too worried about looking for the perfect used model. Do you think the trigger tech upgrade is necessary for newer shooters? In other words, would I even be able to notice it if I’m still a novice?
Remington 700 ??
wasn't that biggest flaw ever made in a gun ??
in a mass produced rifle 3.5 mill made
it would fire when you closed the bolt
If you liked to tinker with things you knew little about. Or treated your rifles poorly with little maintenance. The Remington 700 is for a gun aficionado not a slob. If you’re the latter I’d suggest a plastic t3.
the rem 700 was a failure , popular but not good
the rem 700 was a failure , popular but not good
Lol a very popular failure .... over 5 million sold .... ;-)
over 5 mil sold and a recall would of broke them ..
If you have one be careful