M&P 9mm review

[Ganderite]

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2013/03/18/mp9-review/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=2015-03-17&utm_campaign=Weekly+Newsletter

 

[Lead hammer]

Strange review.

 

[Stephen1546]

It's weird that the reviewer claims you need to pull the trigger to disassemble, when that is not the case at all. You CAN pull the trigger if you want, or you can use the sear deactivation lever like. That is what it was designed for.

 

[CV32]

A 2013 review of a handgun that came out in 2005.

 

[Ebola]

That was a ####ing brutal review. The reviewer is a idiot for publishing such garbage and trying to pass it off as a legitimate article.

 

[WRH]

That was a ####ing brutal review. The reviewer is a idiot for publishing such garbage and trying to pass it off as a legitimate article.

Such is the problem with the Internet; any jackass with a keyboard can type up a half-literate "review" and self publish it the same day.

Edit: I forgot my favorite part. The author shows his rounds thrown off to the left, blames the trigger pull and the width of the sights, then shows a picture where the rear sight is obviously off-center... to the left.

 

[9.3 Hunter]

That was a ####ing brutal review. The reviewer is a idiot for publishing such garbage and trying to pass it off as a legitimate article.

yup concur

 

[saskgunowner101]

I didn't care for the review, he uses his Glock too much for a comparison. Let's see, sight radius difference of .09 inch between the two, .07 inch height difference (so his photo is misleading), 2 ounce weight difference, heavier trigger than a Glock?? The click after pulling the trigger, IIRC, it happens about 1 mm out, but nothing wrong with the reset distance.



Is he really saying a Glock trigger is nicer than a stock M&P? Sure, it may be lighter (I doubt it), but you have to start pulling it in Montana, and walk backwards to Regina.