M14 BullPup

trekstor

trekstor

CGN frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
31   0   0
http://www.shortrifles.com/

cop_main_web.jpg



SRSS BullDog762 Bullpup M14/M1A 7.62mm Battle Rifle Goes to Combat: SpecOps Tests BullDog’s Bite
On November 29, 2009, in Featured, Rifles And Carbines, Special Operations, by David Crane

By David Crane
defrev (at) gmail (dot) com

November 29, 2009
Updated on 12/04/09

Fourteen months ago, DefenseReview broke the story on the SRSS BullDog762 bullpup M14/M1A battle rifle (7.62×51mm NATO/.308 Win.). Well, the BullDog 762 just went operational, and Defense Review is going to keep an eye on it to see how it performs in the U.S. military Special Operations (SpecOps) arena against hostile enemy personnel. Hopefully, it will assist its operator in his dynamic, creative ballistic problem solving processes.

The weapon pictured in this article is the GEN II BullDog762 7.62mm NATO battle rifle, but Short Rifle Stock Systems, Inc. (SRSS) is going to start producing the GEN III model as soon as the new top rail (Mil-Std-1913 “Picatinny” rail system) “checks out”, which should be any day now. SRSS will manufacture 25-35 GEN III BulDog762s a month, according to the message DefenseReview received, below. It’s also our understanding that the GEN II BullDog 762 will feature ambidextrous controls and a case deflector with appropriately-lengthened stock (buttstock).

DefenseReview would also prefer to see a Grip Pod System vertical foregrip/fast-deploy bipod/weapon stabilization system on the BullDog762, instead of the folding bipod and separate vertical foregrip pictured. In our opinion, the Grip Pod would be a significantly superior (and significantly ligher-weight) solution for mobile infantry combat.

SRSS has also been developing a navalized, amphibious version of the BullDog762 called the BullFrog762, which will utilize all the GEN III features, along with a few additional features designed and developed to optimize the weapons platform for amphibious operations.

But back to the freshly-operational GEN II BullDog762 battle rifle. The operator battle-testing it (we’ll call him John, even though that’s not his real name) was kind enough to to send Richard Cabral, the BullDog 762’s developer, some initial feedback on it. Mr. Cabral forwarded it to us, along with some commentary.

The following email communications have been sanitized for OPSEC:

From: RICHARD CABRAL
Date: Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 6:54 PM
Subject: Fw:
To: David Crane

David,

I did not block out the faces, so you must block them out should you show them. I also removed John’s (again, not his real name) contact info. John has had the BullDog762 for about two weeks and I need to get more feed back from him before I hook you up with him, he also suggested the same. He is in Afghanistan, I do not know what area, classified. I hope this works for you. In John’s email, he mentions returning the BullDog. I worked it out so they will be keeping it with them for the rest of their tour. What is pictured is our Generation II BullDog as you see it. We will be shipping several once our testing is done.

We will be testing our New Top Rail after Thanksgiving making sure it does all it suppose to do. Once it checks out ok, we will start shipping GEN III BullDog and manufacturing 25-35 units a month. We will be implementing the modular system for both models, but for now we need to get these in to the hands of clients and operators. We will only have the GEN III BullDog till March next year. When the GEN III BullFrog is ready, you will debut it. Have a Great Thanksgiving.

Semper Fi,

Rich

Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 6:15 AM

Richard,

Just shot the 14 [M14] with Bulldog [bullpup stock system]. Very nice. I mounted the SOPMOD components on it. I have the Elcan SU-230 [SU-230/PVS a.k.a. SpecterDR 1-4x combat optic] on top. I did a quick switch, so it doesn’t have the riser on it. It probably needs it. Great optic for the gun though. I did like the way it shot so far. Recoil is fine, sound is not too bad and cheek weld is comfortable. Had limited time with it. I would like to work some CQB and also for hunting two legged animals here in country. It would make a great spotter weapon! Attached are a few pics. Below is Joe ###X’s email address. Let me know if you need anything else on your end. I will be returning this to Joe in a couple of days since we are moving to a hotter area. I look forward to using these more.

Thanks again,

John

Company Contact Info:

Sgt. Richard Cabral, CEO
Short Rifle Stock Systems Inc. (SRSS)
P.O. Box 3940
Crestline, CA 92325
909-338-2577 Office
rich@shortrifles.com Email
http://www.shortrifles.com Website

Additional Photos:

http://www.defensereview.com/srss-bulldog762-762mm-bullpup-m14m1a-battle-rifle-goes-to-combat/


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Any thoughts? I am considering this mod. Would it still be un-restricted? Obviously with out the silencer.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wtI0UX98Uk

It would be awesome for bush waking up here in the north!
 
Yup all the cool stuff is prohib. If a bullpup can be fired without the stock its prohib. Makes no sense I know. Welcome to the LIEberal state
 
trekstor said:
There goes my bubble. Why is it a prohib? to short?
Click to expand...

short answer:

conversion kit for a regular stocked rifle is prohibited, but a rifle designed as bullpup from the start is perfectly legal.

it's the law it doesn't make sense, because people that came up with it doesn't make any sense either.
 
hbean said:
short answer:

conversion kit for a regular stocked rifle is prohibited, but a rifle designed as bullpup from the start is perfectly legal.

it's the law it doesn't make sense, because people that came up with it doesn't make any sense either.
Click to expand...



never voting liberals...:mad:
 
"Removable bullpup stocks are classified as prohibited devices. This regulation led to the RCMP classifying the stock of the Walther G22 rifle as prohibited while the internal components remained non-restricted. Purpose built bullpup firearms such as the FN P-90 and IMI Tavor are not subject to this regulation since the stock is integral to their workings and is thus not removable."

So if someone makes a bullpup conversion that makes the rifle unusable when the stock is off, then it's legal. Like if you had the stock replace a visible working component that would render the rifle inert when the stock is removed, it would be good.
 
dont think so man, could you not just remove the internals and replace that part that the stock contains, therefore making it removable and workable in another stock?

I know, we all wish we could slappa da govs mouth! their laws are downright regod-damn-diculous!
 
Interesting, I was not aware of this.

If I made a bullpup stock for a m-14 that was welded to the reciever, would it be legal?


Meph said:
So if someone makes a bullpup conversion that makes the rifle unusable when the stock is off, then it's legal. Like if you had the stock replace a visible working component that would render the rifle inert when the stock is removed, it would be good.
Click to expand...
 
Captain Paul said:
The laws are made up by people who have no experience in firearms what so ever. So they basically make up retarded laws. Don't ask why or how. You can't approach these things with common sense
Click to expand...

Yes you can approach with common sense -

The rarest thing on this planet is common sense -

The Lieberal party of Kanada is made up of idiots who think they are intellectually above the "common people"-

WE who have "comon sense" unfortunately are in the minority because the past Lieberal ruling party idiots have entrenched immigration rules which have brought 1st generation people from the 3rd world - the majority of which are culturated to 3rd world survival tecniques and 3rd world "common sense". They dont yet understand western world ethics and methadology. That majority of those vote value Kanadian peoples didnt fight the gun legislation.

The most senior Canadian acculturated immigrants in the know (mostly western european 2nd 3rd 4th generation) who attended the input hearings prior to the legislation enactment gave sound advice. They were ignored by the bloc, lieberal ,and ndp panel members because the panel members were politicians and saw no majority votes by appeasing them.

I saw the hearings and the most painful was the RCMP retired staff sgt. who showed how to draft the new legislation reasonably ,using " common sense" and the redheaded uneducated bloc bimbo ##### attacked his reasoning with utter nonsense clearly showing she was totally unaware of the issues, and that she was a totally stoopid airhead without "common sense".

Guess which view was supported by the like minded Lieberal airhead policy makers with no "common sense" - ?

We all live with it today - All started by the PC party Prime Minister Airhead Kim Cambell - -

It all makes sense when you understand the enemy -

believe.jpg
swingerlh.gif


P.S -
for the site admins - The attached pic does not promote nazisim - or christianity -

It is a symbol denoting the values of God ( happens to be Christian - but it could be Muslim Allah,Mohammed [blessings be upon him] , or Buddha or Krishna or whatever ) over TOTALITARIANISM.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom