M855 Ammo in an AR: Does It Live Up To The Hype?

I haven't watched yet but from my own stuff shooting steel...

M855 was the least penetration
Norinco 5.56 was mid
Tulammo was more than both
 
Canadian IVI C77 Ball (our M855) is actually quite accurate even from lot to lot.
I can't recall the exact specifics in the Publication but the maximum required mean spread per 10 shots at 300 meters is very small.
At least the current product is. Not the bad stuff they were pumping out about a decade ago.

The real tragedy of the M855 is it's terrible performance on "medium density game". Because of the design of the projectile, the only way to get it to perform well is to either have a direct hit on a major organ/artery or bone or if the projectile fragments it can cause severe permanent traumatic wound channels up to 7cm wide. Fragmentation is the primary ideal terminal effect of the 5.56mm military round.
Failure of the projectile fragmenting means the projectile will simply tumble and in all probability pass clean through (failing to hit any major artery, bone or organ obviously). It doesn't have nearly enough mass to do any real damage from temporary cavitation on tumbling. We are soft "elasticy" peoples all in all.

It's velocity must be above 2,700 fps regardless of FMJ projectile to even give it a remote chance of fragmentation however. So out of a 20" classic barrel throwing M855 that puts the most lethal probable range at less than 150 meters. With a standard M4 14.5" barrel it's less than 45-50 meters! That's not that much distance at all.
And we keep chopping our barrels shorter and shorter to boot making the round ever more useless.
At 11.5" barrel with an M855 it's less than 15 meters!
A good read on the subject in general:
http://www.angelfire.com/art/enchanter/terminal.html
 
Last edited:
If you haven't watched, don't bother. Watching some dude shoot 40 rounds on paper is a waste of nine minutes. M855 meets the accuracy standard it was intended to meet, any further discussion along those lines is pointless. The points that should have been investigated in detail because they were key elements in the adoption of the ammunition, namely penetration and terminal effect, were discussed only superficially or anecdotally.
 
As a rule SS109 shoots better (at ranges beyond 25m) than the 55gr fodder on the market, it is my belief this is mostly due to the reduced jump with the longer and heavier bullet better fitting most AR chambers.
 
As a rule SS109 shoots better (at ranges beyond 25m) than the 55gr fodder on the market, it is my belief this is mostly due to the reduced jump with the longer and heavier bullet better fitting most AR chambers.

Is the jump really all that reduced?

I think it is due to higher quality production of the bullet with very little concentricity issues and just better production tolerances on a mass scale.
If you load anything to mag length and shoot it in an AR it is taking a trip prior to riding the lands, regardless which bullet you choose.
 
Is the jump really all that reduced?

I think it is due to higher quality production of the bullet with very little concentricity issues and just better production tolerances on a mass scale.
If you load anything to mag length and shoot it in an AR it is taking a trip prior to riding the lands, regardless which bullet you choose.

It also depends on the barrel. My Colt Canada IUR and TAVOR shoot like shotguns with one lot of PMC M855, but the HK and FN barrels will shoot the same ammo no more than 2MOA at 200m. They all shoot federal 55gr fairly well. I find Colt Canada barrels ( including those installed on KAC ) do not shoot PMC M855 well, but they shoot a bit better than FN and HK with 77gr SMK. HK and FN barrels are more average "good" with everything and are not picky eaters as Colt Canada's, that drastically like one thing and hate the other. It is probably something to do with the chamber design and the rifling, etc.
 
Back
Top Bottom