Mag fed vs tube fed?

mralberta

CGN frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
9   0   0
Location
Southern Alberta
So I'm in the market for a new .22. Looked at a Mossberg Blaze with a 30rnd mag and a red dot ($289.00) vs a Marlin (cant remember the model) but tube fed, nice looking for $399.00. Both semi-auto.

The mag holds more and the gun is cheaper with more extras, but the Marlin looks and feels better..... tough decision....
 
You must be talking about the Marlin model 60. Absolutely love mine. Accurate, reliable, and feels nice in hand. You can stuff 14 or 15 cartridges in the tube.


They cost $399 now? They sure went up (unless you meant $299)
 
Current production mossberg 22's are not well liked. My buddy has one (its not a blaze though, its a 715 or something) and its junky. Accuracy is ok, not great by any stretch, the 25rd mag it has can't be loaded all the way, and it doesn't feed reliably. There was a Talo edition kicking around a few months ago for like $170, and I almost bought one because I don't have a semi 22, and I want a cheap one just for screwing around with, but I just couldn't commit to a mossberg 22.

I think I am going to pick up one of the older mossberg 22s one of these days. They come up on the EE relatively often, and are priced quite low considering the reputation they have for accuracy/quality.

Alternatively, the marlin 22s are considered some of the better 22s in the price range.

If you want to use it for hunting, then you have a decision to make about the magazine type. On one hand, a box mag is really good for getting in and out of the truck, as you can easily remove/insert it, whereas the tube mag is more of a pain. On the other hand, if you do a lot of walking, the box mag sticks out and usually sits right in the way of the balance point on the gun.
 
I really liked the way my Marlin 60 shot. But I hated the tube feed. Do a lot of truck hunting up here, so the tube feed was a pain. That price seems to be pretty high, my Marlin was 200 bucks a couple of years ago. Why not look at a 10/22 for that kind of bucks?
 
I really liked the way my Marlin 60 shot. But I hated the tube feed. Do a lot of truck hunting up here, so the tube feed was a pain. That price seems to be pretty high, my Marlin was 200 bucks a couple of years ago. Why not look at a 10/22 for that kind of bucks?

Probably because he wants something that is accurate and reliable out of the box. lol
 
Probably because he wants something that is accurate and reliable out of the box. lol

I'm no 10/22 fan boy as I prefer bolt .22's, but of all the semi auto .22's I have owned my 10/22's are by far the most reliable. Accuracy is nothing special but definitely on par with any other semi auto.
 
Had a Marlin 60 Tube feed. Sold it for the Stainless Marlin 795 mag feed. Same gun really. Get DIP trigger for it and off to the races. Had lots of 1022s. No thanks.
 
I'm no 10/22 fan boy as I prefer bolt .22's, but of all the semi auto .22's I have owned my 10/22's are by far the most reliable. Accuracy is nothing special but definitely on par with any other semi auto.

My personal experience is pretty limited, but my friends' 10-22 has been nothing but a disappointment. Failure to ejects, failure to feeds, double feeds, even an out of battery detonation or two... From what I've read, they are hit and miss. Some are flawless, some not so much. At least they have the aftermarket to fix problems, but you shouldn't have to spend a bunch of money on parts to make a $350+ gun to work...
 
Just buy a Browning sa. 22 and be done with it. Mine has killed more grouse and hares than any other firearm I own , plus I will be able to pass it on to my kids and grandkids and know they will have a quality gun to pass along to their kids. No 200$ gun can give you that kind of satisfaction.
 
You must be talking about the Marlin model 60. Absolutely love mine. Accurate, reliable, and feels nice in hand. You can stuff 14 or 15 cartridges in the tube.


They cost $399 now? They sure went up (unless you meant $299)


That's the model! WSS has a couple different options. A blue one for $249, a boring brown for $179 or a silver one (real nice) for $399.... heavier barrel and real nice looking and feeling gun.
 
Just buy a Browning sa. 22 and be done with it. Mine has killed more grouse and hares than any other firearm I own , plus I will be able to pass it on to my kids and grandkids and know they will have a quality gun to pass along to their kids. No 200$ gun can give you that kind of satisfaction.

I was going to say I plan on giving my kids my savage mark ii when they get a bit older, but lets be honest, unless I've gotten myself a better 22 bolt gun by then, I'll be keeping it, and getting them their own. lol

But the point remains the same, $200 guns are absolutely worthy of being passed down... Cooeys are a perfect example of this.
 
Can the tube fed 60s feed shorts and longs as well as long rifles?
That would be another benefit.

It depends on the round, I shoot the low power CCI Quiets (only 710fps) and you just have to cycle the bolt manually... shoots some low/standard/target velocity stuff fine though... mine is on older model from the 80's I believe.

edit ** crap you asked about shorts/longs.. pretty sure you can just fit 18/20 shorts in there instead of the 14/15 longs. I'll try tomorrow if I get a chance, might just jam it up.
 
Last edited:
Can the tube fed 60s feed shorts and longs as well as long rifles?
That would be another benefit.

The model 60 tube feed is LR only. I think because it's a semi.
The model 795 mag feed is LR only as well.
The XT-22 TR and TSR are tube feed bolt action, and will shoot 22 L/S/LR - I think you need the combination bolt action with tube feed to shoot all three. (some lever actions do I think as well)
 
The model 60 tube feed is LR only. I think because it's a semi.
The model 795 mag feed is LR only as well.
The XT-22 TR and TSR are tube feed bolt action, and will shoot 22 L/S/LR - I think you need the combination bolt action with tube feed to shoot all three. (some lever actions do I think as well)

On my savage, I have run CCI shorts. It has a box mag. You have to work the bolt a bit slow, with 22lr you can work it as fast as you want and it'll still work whereas the shorts need you to go a bit slower... Otherwise, they worked fine for me. I'll randomly load a few up sometimes when I go to the bush with friends, everyone laughs when they hear the CBs lol
 
I love a .22nwith a tube mag, it's what I shot when I was a kid. I bought a mag fed awhile back as I planned on hunting with it, as others have said the mag fed are easier when getting in and out of a vehicle.
 
Look for the Marlin 795, as mentioned same gun only mag fed instead of tube. Love mine. I also like tube fed as my old Cooey Model 60 makes it to the range on most trips, can't beat it. Actually I like most .22's as they are just plain FUN.
 
I have a marlin 60 as well and love it. Very accurate. Put a mcarbo trigger kit in it and it has really helped accuracy as well as reliable feeding. Used to jam up a bit on cheap Winchester ammo, now will eat them up with no problem at all. I personally like the tube fed but as mentioned above if you're doing a lot of truck hunting and having to be quick getting a shot off the detachable mags are alot more convenient and faster. Never shot the 795 but I'm sure they would be just as accurate and reliable as the 60.
 
Last edited:
Depending on what you want to do with it. Where I used to live, most grouse hunting was done driving roads. When you saw a chicken, you got out, loaded and shot. A box mag is light-years ahead. Even a single shot is better. Also, if you shoot at a "formal" range, if and when you have to make the line safe. it is much easier with a mag or single shot. Just food for thought
 
Back
Top Bottom