Marlin 1895M

MikeyT

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
26   0   0
...in .450 Marlin

Anyone have one? What are your impressions?

I'm thinking of picking up one of these rifles for a general camp gun / bear gun, and also for some hunting. What is the recoil comparable to? I'd be shooting factory loads to start, but would eventually like to reload for this calibre.

I like the short barrel and lever action for a walking around gun, and she should certainly pack enough thump for any sort of big game.

Any opinions or experience with this rifle and calibre would be appreciated.

photo_1895M.jpg
 
Pretty much a 45-70, would be fun to shoot, brass is good, a bit less space. I would get a 45-70 with ballard rifling, and shoot cast for fun, and jackets for everything else.
Guide gun, not ported,18 1/2 barrel if poss. peep sight on the rx.
Frank
 
I have the same rifle in 45-70 and really like it, if your going to reload anyway buy the 45-70 and put the extra 50$ into reloading supplies for it.

Gun carries good, shoots good, functions perfect, needs peep sights tho.
 
Is there no benefit to the .450 over the 45-70? I'm not worried about the extra $50.00.

If the .450 is not superior, is it at least not inferior? I know Russels in Calgary has an 1895M coming in in the next few weeks. I don't know if they have any 45-70's available. Has 450 caught on or is it going to be hard to find factory loads or components?

Thanks for the info so far.
 
Last edited:
The 2 are balisticaly identical with reloads, the 450 was introduced so the ammo makers could load it up hot without the chance of someone jamming it into a weaker actioned rifle.

The 450 is superior with factory loads, the 45-70 evens the score with handloads and may even sneak ahead because of cheaper brass and probably better resale value. (the 45-70 will not be obsolete for a while)

If you plan on keeping the rifle and the cost of ammo, brass, rifle, and resale value isn't a concern go with the 450.

otherwise it's hard to argue with the same power out of a case thats been around for over 100 years.

I guess my point is that when you pull the trigger the same chunk of lead at the same velocity will be coming out of the barrel, it's all the other points that may or may not be important to you that sold me on the 45-70.
 
I agree fully with MaxKW. In my opinion the 45-70 is a better choice. But then again I allready own one and am in the process of getting another and I reload.

Go with the 45-70 you wont be dissapointed :)
 
I'd say that if you're going to shoot factory first and reload second, those are 2 reasons for the 45/70... factory ammo is cheaper, and you can reload it to 450M performance...

BTW, put a limsaver on the back end and it'll make a world of difference
 
Lots of 45-70 shooters, does anyone here have this gun in .450? You've sort of got me leaning towards the government cartridge now, but I'd like to hear from someone with the 1895M.

Levi, you mentioned to avoid porting - how come? Both the guns I've handled in the shop had the porting, I would have thought it would be indicated for such a short barrel. Have you had a bad experience with it?

Silverado, I assume the Limbsaver is some sort of aftermarket recoil pad? Where are these available?

Thanks for all the responses guys.
 
IntelGDR691 said:
Porting is gonna give you a hell of a blast. There is a great danger for hearing damage. Just like any other kind of muzzle break
The porting does quite a bit to quell recoil on this gun especially with hot loads. But your right, it does make it louder.
Shoot an 1895 SS, and a Ported GS side by side, and the recoil difference is very noticable.
With factory ammo, it doesnt bark by any means, but heat it up a bit, and its a different ballgame with porting.
But, anytime your shooting a gun with porting, you should wear hearing protection. Admittedly, I've shot it without, and its not as bad as my 243 without hearing protection.
 
You've sort of got me leaning towards the government cartridge now, but I'd like to hear from someone with the 1895M.

Amphibious here has one, maybe he'll chime in.

One thing about the 450 is factory Hornaday (light mag) ammo with a 350 grain flat point are at 2300 ft/s I'm told. I'm working on loads for my Marlin 45-70 right now with that bullet and its a long ways ahead of my velocities so far.:confused: Mind you I haven't tryed some of the newer powders yet...
 
MikeyT said:
Lots of 45-70 shooters, does anyone here have this gun in .450? You've sort of got me leaning towards the government cartridge now, but I'd like to hear from someone with the 1895M.

Levi, you mentioned to avoid porting - how come? Both the guns I've handled in the shop had the porting, I would have thought it would be indicated for such a short barrel. Have you had a bad experience with it?

Silverado, I assume the Limbsaver is some sort of aftermarket recoil pad? Where are these available?

Thanks for all the responses guys.


I got my pre-fit limbsaver pad from Wholesale Sports ('cause Russels didn't have any).

FWIW, mine's ported, and it's got quite a concussion to it, quite similar to a muzzle break. The ports don't reduce recoil, but are supposed to reduce muzzle jump.'

Some don't feel the extra noise is worth it, and unless I'm mistaken, Marlin has stopped porting the barrels of the 1895G and M for that reason.

You'll have fun either way I'm sure.
 
the Hornady Factory ammo for the .450marlin is FAR more powerful then ANY canadian available factory .45-70 ammo. It pushes a 350gr FN Interloack ot 2150fps from the standard 1895MR, a tad slower from the Guide gun version. for the handloader the factory .450marlin ammo can be exactly duplicated in the .45-70.

So far I've shot 5 animals with the this bullet, at ranges from 10, to 150yrds, and it has preformed flawlessly every time. 3 bears, and 2 moose. this bullet preforms so well, that even though i hand load, it is the only round I'll shoot in my .450.

the Short guide guns are nice, but I prefered the longer version (the discontinued 1895MR) for the lack of muzzle jump, less muzzle blast, and the pistolgrip stock. recoil is comparable to a 12ga 3" slug, or about 35ft.lbs in a 7lb rifle. it more of a push then a punch, and with a little practice you can spot your hits and get a few well placed rounds downrange in very short order. a good recoil pad is a must, the Factory pad is a brick. A Limbsaver is what I have on mine, many people have great luck with the decelerator. Marlin did away with the porting. it was very effective with muzzle jump, but did very little for overall recoil. it also had a bad habit of "Shaving" lead from hardcasts and spitting it out at speed :p

@ 150yrd this round will go through both sides of a bull moose, making the animal ripple like a rock in a still pond, and dropping in it's tracks. @ 70yrds, it penitrated over FOUR FEET of moose (Quartering away) shattering the offside shoulder and was found in a golfball like bump under the offside hide (only bullet I have ever recovered, pictured below). @ 10yrds it will shatter both shoulders of a 7ft1" black bear. shot 2 other bears, both in the 25yrd range, through-and-through.

I won;t bother with hardcasts (UNLESS you want to shoot a lot at the range and cost is an issue), as the factory hornady ammo (or your handloaded equivilent) has more then enough penitration, mushrooms, and does more internal damage.

to that note I've never seen any real meat damage with this round, looks loke someone pushed a broom stick through the animal. you can also PM "Bullcoon" on this board. he has been using a hotloaded .45-70 with the 350gr hornadys much longer then I have, and swears by them as well.

in the end it;s a great gun. I hunt with mine, carried it for 2 seasons of guiding, and it is glued to my shoulder when ever I am out hiking/camping. stick a set of peeps on it, and giv'r!

Recovered.450003.jpg


Recovered.450004.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom