Moose and .30-30 Leverevolution?

True its not a .308, but your last statement says it all, RANGE. At close range, (brush hunting, tracking/still hunting etc.) it has plenty of punch. Im not sure you can have a "better moose rifle" for close range work than a handy, compact, fast-cycling levergun.
Not saying the .30/30 won't kill moose, it has killed thousands. Just saying you don't always get a broadside shot at a standing moose even within the range of the .30/30. Sometimes you need a lot more penetration.
 
Not saying the .30/30 won't kill moose, it has killed thousands. Just saying you don't always get a broadside shot at a standing moose even within the range of the .30/30. Sometimes you need a lot more penetration.

Or patience and common sense to wait for a better shot.
 
Moose haven't got any bigger over the last number of decades and the .30-30 used to be standard equipment. Ammo has only got better ... Should be a no brainier.
 
Or patience and common sense to wait for a better shot.

And if you lived in New Brunswick where getting to hunt a moose is generally a once in a lifetime opportunity and then you only get a 3 day season you would understand Mr. Web's and most New Brunswickers reluctance to hunt moose with a .30-30.

The .30-30 is more than capable if you are willing to play within its limitations.
 
These discussions are more philosophical than practical... Sure .30/30 has killed tens of thousands of moose, but mostly because it was the ONLY gun available at the time... I remember my dad shooting a cow almost 50 years ago with a Win 94 in .32 Special (equal to .30/30)... It killed her with two shots, could have, shoud have been one shot, but dad was always disinclined to "waste" ammo by practicing... These days most people have the wherewithal to shoot many other "more appropriate" calibers... Sure, you can still do it with a .30/30, but perhaps the question should be; "why?"
 
And if you lived in New Brunswick where getting to hunt a moose is generally a once in a lifetime opportunity and then you only get a 3 day season you would understand Mr. Web's and most New Brunswickers reluctance to hunt moose with a .30-30.

The .30-30 is more than capable if you are willing to play within its limitations.


Indeed.

I'm not aware of the various regulations and hunting seasons across Canada.

Given the time limitations and rarity of getting moose tags in your area your choices are understandable.
 
Right. I have never seen a ballistic tip penetrate the length of an elk, whereas I have seen an accubond perform this task with no issue. Yes bonded bullets can be softer, but they are tougher because of the thicker jacket and thus do not come apart.

Well, I would say that your ballistic experience is limited and you have some errant rules of thumb. Firstly, the Accubond does not have a generic overall jacket specification that flows through all calibers, and the same goes for the Ballistic Tip. I have this year used the 120gr BTips out of a 6.5 Rem Mag on the recommendation of some American acquaintances who put enough animals down to know better. They know from experience and fact that specific weights in specific calibers have heavier jackets and bases because of their deferred to uses by their customers. This bullet has had two deer shot by me at over 3000fps impacts and both made hard angle penetrations with full exits. Far superior performance to my experience with the 140gr Accubond in the .280 Remington I have witnessed etc. Because the sectionals show the jackets are not equal, and that BTip I used has a much beefier jacket.
Bonding is only an ingredient, and with other things not being properly engineered can cause a less effective bullet vs the same structure unbonded. In fact, Berger VLDs would theoretically suck bonded. I would bet you'd see deformation and pancakes everywhere.
 
I would totally rock the .30-30 with LE for moose. I think its a perfect moose round within 100 yards. At 200 yards it would be a stretch, I would probably take it if I had lots of time to aim and get perfect broadside placement.
 
Back
Top Bottom