More Liberal Overreach?

LawrenceN

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
248   0   0
Just a "heads up" for my fellow antique owners. I'm in the process of getting the antique status letter for a Smith & Wesson .44 Russian. Outside of the fact that it's taking forever, I had an email from the Canadian Firearms Program asking where I bought it, who I bought it from, and how I came into possession of it. REALLY? Personally, I fail to see how any of this is germane. As we all probably know, if a pistol is made before 1898 and is in a caliber on the deemed "antique", then it's an antique firearm. To me, that's all the criteria which must be met. I am going to be writing to my MP (as if it'll do any good), but I just thought I'd let my fellow gunnies know what's going on.
 
Is the piece registered as restricted now?
If you are not getting it reclassified from restricted to antique, what is your motivation for getting a RCMP letter?
Why not just get a FRT printout?
 
Is the piece registered as restricted now?
If you are not getting it reclassified from restricted to antique, what is your motivation for getting a RCMP letter?
Why not just get a FRT printout?

This. Why are you engaging with government types providing information needlessly? You are within your rights and has nothing to do with them.
 
Ordering that antique status letter may not be the best idea. You are better off carrying the relevant sections of the criminal code and a printout from the Firearms Reference Table.
 
Last edited:
Very bad idea indeed for an existing recognized antique. To have the status changed, i guess you have no choice
 
At one time the letter may have helped an importation of an antique, but as of the last couple decades it's nothing than a registry....
 
I'm in the process of getting the antique status letter for a Smith & Wesson .44 Russian.

I am going to be writing to my MP (as if it'll do any good)

These will be your first and second mistakes.
Please, if you haven't yet, don't do #2.
Also, I can't think of any legal obligation to respond to their request. YMMV
 
These will be your first and second mistakes.
Please, if you haven't yet, don't do #2.
Also, I can't think of any legal obligation to respond to their request. YMMV

Agreed. No need to bring light to a politician the highlights of antique status handguns.

FRT report is the best way to go.

Cheers
Moe
 
He might be trying to sell it?

Having the letter makes it more desirable to some people.

LawrenceN, you may want to speak to someone else at the CFO, than the person you talked with or traded emails with. Some of the folks there can't get their heads around non registration.

Also, I believe some insurers won't insure antique status pistols without the verification letter.

All sorts of reasons why some people want the letter.

Yes, it's just another form of registration.
 
Back
Top Bottom