Mosin 91/30 PU Review - lots of pictures

ArtyMan

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
92   0   0
Location
Ontario
Hey guys,

Recently I acquired a Mosin Nagant 91/30 repro PU sniper and today was the first chance I had to really shoot and sight in the rifle. Several people have been asking me for a review on the rifle, and since I had some spare time this afternoon, here it is...

The rifle I purchased (off a fellow board member) is a 1942 Izhevsk rifle, with all matching parts. Rifle is a standard refurb with a REALLY nice, clean, shiney barrel with strong rifling. The scope is a modern repro of a standard PU with proper PU mount. From what I have read, the scopes ARE made in Russia in the same factory (in most cases) as the originals. The only difference is the scopes are infact, new. I have heard of some mounts being made of aluminum, others having shimming issues, some coming loose, and others being just plain junk. Im happy to say that the rifle far exceeded my expectations in terms of quality and workmanship. So far so good.

Some initial pictures of the rifle - yes I did the wrap job, I like it.
DSCF0390.jpg

DSCF0393.jpg

DSCF0502.jpg


The rifles themseleves are very tight and are assembled very professionally. My first impression of both the rifle and the optics was promising, as the optics were clear, sharp, and the mounts EXTREAMLY sturdy. The rifle itself seemed to be tightened up from a standard 91/30 in the sense that there was NO movement anywhere on the rifle, no loose wobble or play anywhere. This rifle has a pre/early war stock which was in excellent shape,still bearing part of the arsenal stamp on the butt. Overall the rifle seemed to be in really good shape, and I was happy. Now time for the real test of a rifle - firing.

Some shots of the scope/mount - Excellent construction
IMG_3097.jpg

IMG_3095.jpg


Over the last few days I decided to work up a load for the rifle using 150gr .312 Hornady SP ammo, with 46-48 gr of Reloader 15 powder. Im using Prvi brass and standard Winchester large rifle primers. Here is a shot of the ammo on the bench. Pretty standard load for my 91/30's.

DSCF0458.jpg


Today I packed the rifle up and the ammo and headed up to the range to see if the rifle would be everything I thought it would be, and Im happy to say I was not dissapointed. The temperature was about 2-4 degrees here, overcast, very damp out but with little wind. I decided to sight the rifle in at 100m to get started before attempting any sort of distance shooting. At 100m the 3.5x power PU proved to a great aid in aiming and acquiring targets. I fired the rifle off a front rest with a sandbag while sitting. Not a 'true' bench set up, but worked great - I was here to test the rifle, not me! After "bore sighting" the rifle/scope I was ready to go. To bore sight the rifle, I removed the bolt, and while looking through the barrel, focused on a target 100m away. I then looked through the scope to see if the scope was roughly where the barell was pointing... it was WAY off, so after some rough adjustments, I was roughly on. I then fired two shots, adjusted, two more, adjusted etc... After about 8 shots I was in the bull VERY consistently with no trouble. The rifle held its zero with no issues. The trigger pull was decent, not to heavy, but by no means a hair trigger. The rifle cycled and fed perfectly.

Here are a few pictures.

DSCF0448.jpg

DSCF0449.jpg

DSCF0452.jpg

DSCF0453.jpg


The optics

DSCF0451.jpg

DSCF0459.jpg

DSCF0450.jpg


Of course the iron sights are still usable.
DSCF0455.jpg


And of course, the results...

The best group of the day, measuring a hair under 1inch. Just a note, the gr was actually 47, not 48
DSCF0495.jpg

DSCF0496.jpg

DSCF0497.jpg


Overall the rifle performed flawlessly and I highly reccomened it to anyone looking for a Mosin 'sniper' who isnt prepared to drop 1300$+ looking for what MAY be the real deal. These rifles are as close as the average person will get to a WWII sniper rifle, and they perform excellently! These rifles are available from a variety of sources (site sponsors) and are well worth a second look when considering a scoped milsurp - without the hacksaw and dremel of the bubba!

Any comments/feedback appreciated
Thanks for looking!
 
Last edited:
I sold my 91/30 a few months back, now Im sitting on over 1k rounds of 7.62x54r. I have always been into milsurps, espcially sniper rifles, but have never had the money for an Enfield N0.4T, 03 A6 Springfield or an M1-D. I have found a couple nagant snipers for sale between 600-800$ and Some SVT snipers for a bit more. Not positive which to go with yet, probably the mosin though since it is less expensive, easier to maintain and I wont be tempted to burn though all my ammo too quickly with the Mosin.

Thanks again for the superb review
 
Sometimes the iron sights arent aligned properly and can be off themselves. You can try the bore sighting method with iron sights aswell, you'll be surprised at how far off they can be at times, depending on the rifle. Most Soviet combat rifles are sighted from the factory at 300m
 
Great review. That scope seems quite high. Did the ruskies have a military issue cheek riser? I have a regular 91/30 and I have to say it is one of my favourites. I like the 91/30 for its long barrel which surely helps with accuarcy(way better than the M44 that I had before). Not to mention a 2 foot tongue of fire plus enough concussion to knock the snow of the range roof( love those yellow tips)! I have a '42 [SA] marked unit and it shoots great with the irons, but the problem is my sight isn't what it used to be and a scope would be a vast improvement.
 
Last edited:
I've got my mosin 91/30 sniper earmarked for any "sit and wait" hunting (carried it all last fall).

I've never had problems with mosins. Very under rated rifles IMO. Looks like yours is nicely put together too. These're built to last!
 
That scope seems quite high. Did the ruskies have a military issue cheek riser? .

All of the PU's I have seen are placed very high on the rifle, the Russian snipers never had a cheekrest, although im sure they would benefit from some sort of tie on cloth cheek rest. Its really not that bad, just takes some getting used too.
 
My 42 Nagant really loves those .312 150gr Hornady Interlocks as well, in fact, it's all I use now. I just have trouble finding them, as most distributors are out whenever I check.
 
Great pics and review, you have a nice rifle there, and I also like the burlap style camo wrap you did, looks very true to the period. :)
 
thanks! I was unsure of buying one at first, and after asking in a thread I pretty much recieved positive feedback from owners, so I thought I'd write up something up to dispell any myths involved with the repros
 
ArtyMan, thank you for such an informative post, and overall excellent review. I have an original 91/30 PU sniper and I have too had the opportunity to handle one of the recent imports, and have been very impressed with the quality and the price. Thanks again and Happy Sniping:)
 
Hi there one and all:The Mosin Naganet if you happen to have a original sniper rifle is a real tack driver.Usually you can shoot a 2-3 inch group at 300+yards and the action is very reliable. But what is up with with this one? It does'nt look like this is the original arctic birch,perhaps a quick trip to the hardware store? Please don't bubba these rifles.Leave them as they are.You would'nt what me to sporterize you grandpa's Longbranch
 
This rifle is indeed in an original Mosin stock, as is evident by the soviet stock cartouche on the butt, the screwed in sling estruchions are an indicator of a pre/early war stock. Im not saying the rifle wasnt restocked at some time, as there is a chance it may have been during the arsenal refurb, however, it is a standard, run of the mill everyday Soviet Mosin stock.

Altough a repro sniper rifle, the rifle has not been to a hardware store, or 'bubba'd/sporterized in any way, unless your refering to a Soviet arsenal, as it is a refurb (as is evident by the refurb stamp on the reciever).

Please don't accuse me of sporterizing a rifle, I have worked on quite a few rifles, FIXING, what bubba did before. If you read my post, you will see how I make a reference to NOT having to cut up a rifle, or bubba it in any way. This is the last thing I would do to any one of my 6 Mosins, or any milsurp firearm at that. I have a great respect for any and all pieces of history, and am VERY careful not to screw anything up.

Please stop and read the entire post next time :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top Bottom