Mossberg 835 Ulti-Mag Turkey for duck hunting?
- Thread starter gotnewf79
- Start date
I didnt think the ducks would care.
I was asking because im looking at getting this gun but want to hunt both turkey and duck. I dont want to buy it if it isnt practical, I will look into a different shotgun.
Good to see im not the only newfoundlander on this site.
I was asking because im looking at getting this gun but want to hunt both turkey and duck. I dont want to buy it if it isnt practical, I will look into a different shotgun.
Good to see im not the only newfoundlander on this site.
The only difference you should be aware of is the barrel and the sights. If for turkey, you might be using rifle type iron sights or red dot, then for ducks it won't work because you're not aiming like in turkey case but rather pointing and swinging, so a single bead will suffice.
Another feature to be considered is choke. For turkey, you would normally use extra full or full choke, for ducks more open chokes normally, depending on the setup (blind, over deacoys, etc.)
Another feature to be considered is choke. For turkey, you would normally use extra full or full choke, for ducks more open chokes normally, depending on the setup (blind, over deacoys, etc.)
You sure can just make sure you have the correct chokes installed for shooting steel on the ducks and lead on the turkey. Spend some time patterning your loads it is well worth the effort. Also made sure you handle one prior to buying since I found they don't fit the average guy and I was struggling to pump the action.
Final note probally the second hardest kicking shot gun I have ever fired almost as bad as my BPS 10ga.
I agree with 3macs1 but I have to say that personal experience has proven to me that the longer barrel of a "duck gun" is far more versatile than the shorter barrel of a "turkey gun". I prefer a 28" barrel but in your case, maybe the 26" barrel 835 will be the best of both worlds. I would buy a used Remington 870 Wingmaster in 3" or even an older 2 3/4" only chamber over a Mossberg...again that is personal preference...albeit based on a few hundred thousand rounds. When you do get your gun, whatever you choose, pattern it as suggested by 3macs1. And don't be afraid to try light 2 3/4" 1oz field loads of #6 and #5 shot, you may very well be surprised to see that the patterns are actually better than the ones from the 3.5" turkey loads!
Last edited:
Second specialized barrel will definitely be of great asset. And you can't beat pump's reliability compared with semis.
My first shotgun was Remington 870 Wingmaster. They don't make them anymore like they used to. So, I'd agree with VLT79, get an old one. They may cost a bit more than modern 870 but will last a lifetime without a hitch.
Here is the detailed review of Remington's new addition -- the infamous 887 -- http://randywakeman.com/ClunkerOf2009Award.htm
Here is the detailed review of Remington's new addition -- the infamous 887 -- http://randywakeman.com/ClunkerOf2009Award.htm
Most definately. The only complaint I wouild have with the 535 is the forearm had a lot of play and would rattle. Some stick on felt solved the problem. Mine was a very early one and they say the latest runs this is not an issue but I have not tried another to confirm. Price is right on these also
Oh for f'K sake. Do you even own a 2nd generation wingmaster to make a statement like that. Who are you trying to impress with all your posts which are full of incorrect information.
There is nothing wrong with the quality of a second generation wingmaster vs the initial ones. Bought my 1st in 1965 and still buying them. Own more right now than you have fingers in every gauge.
Only problem with today's wingmasters is they are expensive. Give it up with your google experiences.
Actually, many older used 870 Wingmaster will set you back less than a new 870 Express. And as far as the Express is concerned it will last just as long as a Wingmaster...regardless of when it was built. The biggest difference in price between the two guns is from the cheaper bead blasted finish, stock/forearm materials and plastic trigger guard used in the Express guns. The 887...well I was told that if you have nothing good to say, you shouldn't say anything at all!
My thoughts exactly! I bought a new 12ga. 28" Wingmaster last march and there was absolutely nothing to complain about... Besides the price that is! I just bought a like new '89 built TC-Trap for $15 less than the new field gun!
You are really passionate about this issue, I see... Lets turn emotions off and work with facts. The newer 870s have ugly wood or worse -- laminate :-( Older Wingmasters were beauty queens!
I see every body sell older Wingmasters in $350, 400+ range. The new Express ones go for around $300 new.
Again...you obviously don't own a late production Wingmaster! If you do you should go get your eyes checked my friend cause they have some of the best wood found on standard production field guns on the market today! Well, the 7 examples I examined before buying mine did anyway...
My very last response to you and your foolishness. You are either 10 years old or no I won't even go there.
Well Mr. remington you are talking the express which is a totatly different animal. Cannot buy a true wingmaster with ugly wood as you say and never was a wingmaster offered with lamintate.
Ok you seem to know the facts on wingmasters and wood. What wood was used initially and in what year was it changed and to what and what year was it changed again. Fill your boots and impress us
Sorry I lied now my last post. New express wingmasters now that is one for ripleys. If there was ever a chance one might think you have so 870 knowledge you just blew it. The new sportsman field ones are not wingmasters and not 300 new . They are dressed up express.let me guess you seen that on the internet on Epps site which is wrong
Last edited:
