I have both the Versamax Tactical and the JM Pro. I won't repeat the information already stated here as it seems correct from my experience in particular the 3" vs 3.5" marked on the barrel of the VMT. Casey told me the same thing. If I had done my research properly I would not have chosen the VMT. Casey made a competition Versamax for a friend of mine that is better than the stock VMT.
I like the loading of the JM Pro off the bat. I don't like that the Versamax has a cartridge release which is an extra step in the loading process. JM Pro just has a bolt release. I suppose you can train yourself through that.
The carrier for the VMT is a killer. It is forked and will definitely take a bite out of your hand in fast reloading. I'm trying to find the time to get someone to do this in Vancouver toute suite. Also to be nicer the loading port should be beveled.
The Versamax is built tighter and slightly lighter. It is built better. I like the VMT's foreend better / the JM Pro's foreend is cheapish. I had a very poor experience with the JM Pro with cycling issues, shell stop problems. I should have sent it back immediately and after a seemingly endless back and forth just took it back and sent it to Tacord who sorted it out by replacing the spring and rebuilding it. It now seems to run pretty good though. I learned I should leave gunsmithing to others and send back lemons.
On the plus side they both shoot quite well now. Buckshot, target loads, slugs. I think they are pretty close in terms of recoil. I like both sights.
Wow, thanks for the comparison! Food for thought for sure.




















































