Mp44 back in production

where have you been :p , this has already been discussed, however, still worthy of a second look.

the previous debate on this was the availability of ammo, some wanted a 7.62x39 version.

i sure want one, but it would have to be in original ammo specs.
 
Light Infantry said:
Apparantly Wolf is making 7.92 x 33.

Oh good, we can get local stores to stock it along with the 7.62x39 what we can get so easily. :p

Seriously though, I'd take one if it was in 7.62x39, I imagine 8x33 brass is hard to come by.
 
happydude said:
Oh good, we can get local stores to stock it along with the 7.62x39 what we can get so easily. :p

Seriously though, I'd take one if it was in 7.62x39, I imagine 8x33 brass is hard to come by.

I thought someone told me, that owns a MP44, you can make the Kruz casings out of resized .308 brass....
 
Okay face it... getting it in 7.62x39 would just look stupid... and then the whiners will want it to be able to accept AK mags.

"Can I make it accept M4 stocks?"

And then you'll probably want rail systems to mount an eotech and folding stock adaptors.

What we're looking at here is a faithful semi-auto reproduction of the Mp43/Stg44. If you want a rifle that's mag fed and eats M43 ammo like crazy then get a Vzor 58.
 
Jeremy said:
Sorry for the stupid question but I'm half asleep right now :p Are these things actually legal in Canada with our wonderful gun laws?

If it is a newly manufactured reciever that is only capable of semi-auto fire, it SHOULD be legal. 'Should' being the key word as it would have to be inspected by the RCMP techs I think to make sure that FA parts couldn't be slipped in after the fact. I can't see how this is any different than the new manufacture semi-auto MG-34 that Marstar sells right now.

The MP44 barrel is less than 18.5 so it would be a restricted weapon though.
 
An original MP44, either selective or CA, is grandfathered prohibited, with cutoff dates of 1978 and 1995, respectively. No additional ones can enter the system. There are some grandathered ones in the system, but they are not common. An unaltered specimen could be hard to sell, because the pool of qualified buyers is so small.
If a person did not own a grandfathered FA or CA prior to the cutoff dates, they can never own one. If a person is grandfathered, they cannot shoot one, unless SAPs are reinstated. One of these new ones could be owned by anyone with a restricted PAL, and shot under the authority of a standard ATT.
There are those who will pay 3 grand for one, just as there are those who will invest 10K in some .50s, with all the accessories.
 
tiriaq said:
If a person did not own a grandfathered FA or CA prior to the cutoff dates, they can never own one.
according to your logic, no one can own an mg34 either unless grandfathered. If it's a new manufacture, and the old mp44 parts dont fit, then it should be legal to own.

And wouldn't unpinned mp44 mags be legal since it was designed prior to 1945? Kinda like Garands with 8 rounds
 
If a person did not own a FA or CA prior to the cutoff dates, they can never own one. AND they had to be in possession of at least one firearm of the class as of the implementation date, AND they have to be in continuous possession of at least one specimen in each category to retain grandfathered status.
No one can own an original MG34 in either class unless grandfathered, with a PAL valid for 12(2) or 12(3) as the case may be.
If the firearm is of new manufacture, originally semi-auto, and has passed inspection, then it can be acquired with a current PAL. There are a variety of firearms in this category, with more alll the time. In all likelihood, this new German made MP44 would qualify. I can't imagine that the German authorities are more lenient in their inspection criteria than ours are. The MP44, with its separate safety and selector might be one of the easier designs to manufacture so that it is unquestionably semi-auto. With no provision for a selector or any auto fire components, its semi-auto status should be easy to establish.
Unblocked MP44 mags are prohibited devices. M-1 rifles are specifically exempted, as are belts for a firearm originally designed prior to 1945. The 1945 date is relevant only for belts. This one can be a bit tricky; if you have one of the Browning clones, cloth belts or pull out links as originally used are acceptable; newer designs which can be used as push through or pull out may not be.
Assuming that these new MP44s and MP38s are actually available for purchase, I'm sure it will be a matter of time before someone goes through the process of importing them.
 
Back
Top Bottom