NEA 7" Range Report

Ganderite

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 99.7%
355   1   0
In the last month we have acquired three NEA AR-15s. 14.5”, 10.5” and just this week, a 7.5”

I note it has a ring-style sling mount behind the trigger. I like this shape. It handles all my sling snaps, whereas one of the other NEAs has a slot style sling mount that some slings do not fit.

I don’t know what sight my son intends to install on it, but I rummaged around and came up with a set of plastic folding sights (about $14.00 on Ebay) and a red dot sight.

I tested it at 25 yards. I know this is very short range, but it is the perfect distance for zeroing sights for CQB. The rifle does not sound particularly loud. However, the guys on the bench beside me were quick to comment on how LOUD it was. It has the standard birdcage flash suppressor. When I shot it over a Chrony, later, I made the mistake of not wearing ear protection. It was painful.

The carbine functioned perfectly. Trigger was not nearly as bad as the Daniel Defense I broke in a couple months ago. I think I will just polish this one and not replace it, as I usually do.

Zeroing with the back up sights went smoothly. The only glitch is that the rear sight won’t stay folded. It pops up when the gun fires. It looks like a few passes of a file will enhance the retainer notch. When I put the red dot on, I just adjusted the red dot to coincide with the iron sights. This made zeroing real quick.

NEA73.jpg


I have not used a red dot much, but after I zeroed it, the first five shots from the standing position and all hit within a 1” black patch. I was impressed with the shooting. I look forward to putting a 20X scope on it and shooting some groups at 100 yards.

The other test I did was a double tap test. With full power ammo, a full sized AR-15 (when I shoot it) jumps to the right quite a bit. A double tap at 25 yards would score a 2 or maybe even a miss for the second shot. For this reason I install muzzle brakes on my ARs, and turn them clockwise a bit (about 2:00 o’clock) so they push the muzzle to the left. I also down load the ammo a bit. Milder ammo does not jump as much, it is easier on the rifle and it still punches holes in the paper at 25 yards. My mild ammo only does 1730 fps out of this shorty, vs 3280 for full power in a 20" barrel. IVI in a 20" is 3165 fps. In this 7.5" shorty it is only 2360 fps.

This is a 25yd double tap group, shot standing. I slapped the trigger twice, as fast as I could.

NEA71.jpg


One of the effects of a real short barrel is the loss of a lot of velocity. So even full power ammo does not kick and jump as much. I tried double tapping with both full power ammo and with mild ammo. I saw some jump to the right, but not much with either flavour of ammo, and on the target, both groups looked about the same, with the shots well centered. I think the factory suppressor is perfectly adequate.
 
Last edited:
cool, thanx for the review.

couple of questions/observations.

I see that the trigger guard looks like its built into the lower, not removable?

and there is no delta ring setup, the hand guards just clamp over the upper?

also how do you like that cheap red dot? I have seen those for sale, but was skeptical
 
I just attended a Phase Line Green carbine course last weekend. I am not positive on the round count but it was probably around 450. During the course I ran an NEA 10.5" carbine. It does have JP springs in it and a ATRS Eliminator flash hider. These two additions were added immediately after getting the gun. I did have some issues during the course but they were mag related with the D&H mags being pinned too tight. Once I moved over to my PMags or the LAR mags, the issues disappeared. I ran Wolf 223 ammo in it and it was soft to shoot and quiet due to the style of flash hider. Not that this is the end all be all of testing but the gun worked fine foe me during the course. There was also another NEA on the line that had no issues.
 
The receiver is quite different than other AR-15s. If you put a NEA beside others it looks different in every detail. More angular, where the others are round. I like the looks, but, that said, looks don't count much for me. I am a shooter. I look for a good trigger, accuracy and reliability. My Norc (with a few mods) is plain, if not ugly, but accurate and reliable.

I shot the 7.5"again today and was very impressed with the accuracy from the standing position. I will shoot a CQB with it.

Yes, the trigger guard is integral with the lower. Opening looks to be quite large.

I think the hand guard clamps onto the delta ring, not on to the receiver itself. I have not had it apart to see how it works. The hand guard was a bit loose when I got home. It wiggled about a tenth of an inch. I tightened the clamping screws and it is tight now. NEA tell me they have a new design hand guard and a new delta ring design, so I am assuming these will show up soon at dealers. I am assuming this is an improvement in the design.

The cheap red dot works well, so far. I have a SPARC mounted on a 858, that costs 3 or 4 times as much. I bought this TruGlo on ebay for $19 (used). The dot is very small. I am guessing 2 MOA. It is a bow sight, not a rifle sight. Did not notice that in the ad when I bought it. The clicks worked well when I zeroed it.

The SPARC and the other better quality sights have an auto-off feature, so you don't kill the battery. I don't know if this one has that feature.

I have not used a red dot much, so can't really compare or comment much. But I could easily hit what I was aiming at - so I guess it works.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom