Newest Toy .... Webley R.I.C. revolver

GrantR

GrantR

CGN frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
13   0   0
Location
Medicine Hat, Alberta
A local acquaintance decided he was willing to part with his Webley R.I.C. revolver and .... since I've always wanted one ..... :rolleyes:

Click on thumbnails -





This double action, sidegate loading/extracting design was first introduced in 1867, and was adopted by the Royal Irish Constabulary the following year, thus becoming known as the "R.I.C." model. A robust, functional and accurate revolver which saw a great deal of civilian, police and military use in Britain and its Empire, as well as throughout the world. Numerous copies of varying quality were produced in a number of foreign countries ..... George Armstrong Custer is reported to have been presented with a pair of R.I.C. revolvers in 1869 by the British Ambassador, and supposedly favored them - it is believed that he was carrying them at the Battle of the Little Bighorn ....

Serial no. 6597

Marked, left side of frame, in front of cylinder:
WEBLEY'S
R.I.C.
No. 1 .455 CF
NEW MODEL

Winged bullet logo over "W&S" lower front of frame, left side.

Marked on top strap:
ARMY & NAVY (left side of sight groove)
C. S. L. (right side of sight groove)
(This indicates that the revolver was retailed by the Army & Navy Co-Operative Society Limited ... an early "co-op" set up to supply British military and naval officers with virtually everything they required in service.)

Fully functional, bright clean bore with strong rifling. I have 50 black powder MkI cartridges loaded, and hope to get a chance to play with it briefly following a Cowboy Action match I'm going to tomorrow, which is being held in a small town indoor range - if they'll let me fire BP in there at all, that is .....

But I'm definitely a happy camper! :D
 
Last edited:
Now that I have had the chance to put a few rounds through this revolver, I'm even more pleased! :D

I only fired 15 rounds on Sunday because the small, old indoor range was filling up with more smoke than the exhaust system seemed able to handle ... :rolleyes:

Also, frankly, I decided that my standard load for my other .455 revolvers (effectively the British War Department specs for the MK I cartridge - i.e. 18 grains FF black powder well compressed behind a long-nosed hollowbase 265 gr bullet) was simply too stout to be very pleasant in this little revolver. They produced very substantial recoil, stupendous muzzleflash ... and cylinder gap flash, for that matter ... and flattened primers, which also gave rise to some degree of safety concern. :(

However, other than those minor details, it was an absolute blast ... both literally and figuratively! ;) It seemed to want to print reasonably well - i.e. likely quite sufficient for CAS-type shooting - but a more definitive test of accuracy will have to await another opportunity with some downloaded cartridges ...

A bit more detail, now that i've had the time to investigate further: this particular version of the R.I.C. - i.e. the .455 Center Fire New Model - was introduced in 1883. It had a longer cylinder to accomodate lengthier cartridges, and the cylinder flutes were introduced at this time (I assume as a weight-reduction measure to compensate for the elongated cylinder.) In fact I learned that, with this version, even .44-40 and .45 colt chamberings were manufactured! A .45 Colt round will chamber and seat almost all the way in my .455 revolver. If a .45 Colt would seat fully - it's only about 1/32" short of doing so, as it is - the bullet nose would be nearly flush with the chamber mouth ... I can only imagine the excitement of firing one of those cartridges in this model of revolver - considering how it roared with .455 Webley! :eek:

Finally, a fellow who has copies of many of the Army & Navy Co-operative Society Ltd. firearms sales records, tells me that he was able to locate serial numbers 6596 and 6598 (i.e. flanking my serial number) in the sales records for 1886 - although mine did not show up on his review .... (He did mention that a review of these records show that the sales were quite jumbled up, serial number wise. I suppose that may reflect a purchaser's preference for some feature of one revolver over an earlier serial numbered one, so that the later number sold first ... or something of that nature.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom