Nikon Slughunter with BDC reticle
- Thread starter Ahsan Ahmed
- Start date
Optical clarity is excellent - on par with my Bushnell 3200.
Low light performance was ok, couldn't tell the difference between the Nikon and Bushnell 3200.
The eye relief was excellent. Perfect for my USH!
One negative thing I noticed was a little bit of fish-eye distortion at the very edges of the circle. This was only noticable when I look through the scope at a bubble level straight edge about 10 meters away. I've never done this with a 3200, so I can't say if it had a similar distortion, but I suspect it does not.
The scope also seemed to be prone to slight glare from the sun. I noticed it as an overly bright corner of the image circle, a little washed out. Perhaps this is from Nikon using different coatings on their lenses than Bushnell? I didn't ever notice this problem with a 3200.
The windage and elevation turrets are very nice, much nicer than those on the 3200.
Low light performance was ok, couldn't tell the difference between the Nikon and Bushnell 3200.
The eye relief was excellent. Perfect for my USH!
One negative thing I noticed was a little bit of fish-eye distortion at the very edges of the circle. This was only noticable when I look through the scope at a bubble level straight edge about 10 meters away. I've never done this with a 3200, so I can't say if it had a similar distortion, but I suspect it does not.
The scope also seemed to be prone to slight glare from the sun. I noticed it as an overly bright corner of the image circle, a little washed out. Perhaps this is from Nikon using different coatings on their lenses than Bushnell? I didn't ever notice this problem with a 3200.
The windage and elevation turrets are very nice, much nicer than those on the 3200.
