Norinco JW15

ratherbefishin

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
EE Expired
Rating - 100%
29   0   0
I have both a BRNO 22 and a Norinco .22 magnum-pretty much the same rifle -except for the stock-the Norinco stock is functional but not well finished[I only paid $100 for it years ago from SIR]The trigger was not bad though,and its accurate enough for what I want,so I have no complaints

My question is-with Norinco now offering synthetic stocks[I see moreguns has a camo thumbhole synthetic stock model on sale for $199]-how do they now compare?
 
what I would really like to know is-are the Nornico synthetic stocks and better or worse then the other synthetic stocks ie:-marlin?

My marlin 795 synthetic stock is functional enough,but it just doesn't feel ''solid''-I've toyed with the idea of injecting it with hard foam[you'd have to be careful that you didn't put too much in, it could expand too much and distort it]

I admit-I like the LOOK of the thumbhole synthetic stock on that JW15-but I'd like to hear some reviews before I buy one.Since NORINCO isn't sold in the US-chances are we won't be seeing any write ups in firearms magazines-too bad a CANADIAN magazine doesn't pick up on it
 
I have seen the Norinco stocks refinished, and they came up quite nicely. The chu wood tends to be fuzzy when being sanded. Apply a coat of finish, let it harden, then sand again to get rid of the fuzz.
Have sold quite a few 15s over the years, both .22lr and .22Mag. Quality control of finishing details has been variable. Some were pretty rough. Never saw one that didn't shoot well.
Personally, I would prefer to refinish the existing wood stock, rather than buy another rifle with a cammo finished synthetic. Cleaned up, slicked up, deburred, a 15 is a decent rifle.
As far as getting what you pay for, as I mentionned, I sold quite a few 15s. They represented sound value. Cost way less than half what a Brno sold for, but were a lot more than half the gun. Don't think I ever had one come back with either functionning problems or with complaints about accuracy. There were other Norinco guns I sold, and never reordered. I also didn't sell SB .22 semi autos.
 
I think Norinco synthetics are better than their wood, but that's my opinion. I also don't think their synthetics are any worse than most the Marlin .22s I've seen. My next .22 will probably be one of the short JW15s, handled one a few weeks back at my local shop...had to edit my letter to Santa. :)
 
I do admit a preferance for thumbhole stocks,you can get one from Boyds for about $69,and that may be a better option than buying a synthetic thumbhole stock-it would be heavier but it would look a lot nicer.
yes,that short barreled HIKER is very attractive for a grouse gun,and since we can't pack a handgun could be a good alternative when we're out hunting with a centerfire
 
Got mine yesterday and cleaned it of the DWFO gunk. The stock is fine, although the butt pad is just hard plastic. The rear sight is not much to talk about and I might try to find a CZ mag release to replace the Nork one.
The stock mag is robust, far more than the one on my Winchester rifle. The safety is very stiff, but will likely free up soon enough. Will try to shoot it this weekend.
 
Got mine yesterday and cleaned it of the DWFO gunk. The stock is fine, although the butt pad is just hard plastic. The rear sight is not much to talk about and I might try to find a CZ mag release to replace the Nork one.
The stock mag is robust, far more than the one on my Winchester rifle. The safety is very stiff, but will likely free up soon enough. Will try to shoot it this weekend.

Got mine 2 days ago - boy that Norincoil is on everything. :p
Out of curiosity, what did you use to clean it ?
Anyone try their CZ mags to see if they work in it?
 
The magazines are close to being interchangeable. I have done a bit of light fitting to get Norinco mags. to work in Brnos. Given the price differential, can't see buying Brno magazines for use in a Norc.
 
I used WD-40 on the whole gun and then a finally cleaning of the stock with windex. Used Brakeclean on the bolt.
 
All I gotta say is you get what you pay for...




Not quite true. Some Norincos are worth far less than you pay,
Some of their products (Depending on the factory in China) are equal to or better than comparable European and U.S. products.
I got a very good deal on a number of JW25A rifles. It is obvious from the serial numbers and other marks that a couple of the poorly fit guns either came from a different factory, or a production run where the labour was unskilled. The balance (with the later serial numbers) had a much better fit and finish.

I have seen and handled a JW15A and am considering buying one later today.
The fit and finish on the one I handled is as good as or better than on current N American production on this rifle. The composite stock feels solid and has a very nice "soft" feel to it.
If that stock was sold separately I would consider buying a couple and fitting one to CZ #1 rifle.
 
Where can you get norinco mags?[if they fit-I need one for my BRNO]

That is hit and miss.It may take a little tuning to the mag to get it to fit. Do not tune the rifle as then BRNO mags may not fit...
Marstar, Lever, P&D, and Milarm have norinco mags.

find a fellow shooter with a norinco 22 and see if the mag fits. If it does order one from a dealer...
 
Took mine to the range yesterday, -1 Celsius, the gun worked like a charm, ate everything I threw at it including Stingers. Accuracy was good, nice groups at 75m. The sight is the limiting factor, as it is hard to use. The trigger is very nice for the value of the gun. The bolt worked fine, slightly gritty, but that will work in. The biggest issue I have with this gun is the 5 rd mag is not enough! This gun really needs 10rds. The mags are very robust. I plan on finding a dovetailed peep sight for it and toss the awful rear sight. Very happy with this gun and it will be good to give to the ladies as it’s easy to hold. Just watch the muzzle control, it’s easy to point this gun at the wrong thing.
 
Back
Top Bottom