lookout said:are they not available?
Skullboy said:Marstar set the bar with the $399.00 price.
That is a AWESOME price!!!As Hungry says, don't by one, buy two!!!!
However IMHO, even at $699.00 these rifles are a good deal.
The FORGED reciever is worth the $699.00 by itself!!!!!
The only other forged reciever being made right now (LRB Arms) is $680.00 U.S.!!!!!
I paid $699.00 for my first M305 because I didn't feel like waiting.it was another 5 or 6 months before the $399.00 rifles hit the shore.
SKBY.
RUPZUK said:Marstar was 399.00 , Dark was 449.00 and others even higher .all at the same time for the same gun .
sprint said:Been wondering about the variances in manufacture quality that always seems to plague Chinese products...
Looked up and found the following
http://www.thehighroad.org/archive/index.php/t-1580.html
Most poignant comment was that a good cast beats a poor forge any day.
Would love to hear counterpoint.
If the Norinco beats "good enough" at the price point of ~$400.00, it's a pretty good reason to buy.
**Edit - been reading good things about them here: http://www.ar15.com/lite/topic.html?b=6&f=2&t=196028&page=2
Skullboy said:The Chinese Forged Recievers are of excellent quality.They are as dimensionally correct as TRW forged recievers.
WHen you see Americans talking down Chinese M14s, you must realise that due to U.S. restrictions, they can not get the newer version Chinese M14s that we get up here.
The older Polytech/Norinco M14s that the Americans talk about are from the mid 1990s or so.These are the rifles that had the soft bolt/headspace issues.
SKBY.
sprint said:That seems accurate to me from what I am reading right now. Fulton Armory reflects the same. Essentially, the reciever is such a close match that some writers like Diffferent suggest they know well informed people who believe they may be restamped originals.
All agree that with some Bolt lapping a USGI bolt will fit with near perfect precision.
While none have performed any official metalurgical study, the rumored tests on the metal do suggest it to be 5100 series chromium steel.
On the VERY flipped side, the failures of SA recievers mentioned at FA occured when shooting excessive loads, probably for 1000s of rounds. This makes me a bit more suspicious of claims of doom and gloom re: Cast recievers.
I would be interested to see if they are high or low pressure cast. Either way, it is academic, considering the rifles were intended for lower pressure loads.
On the big plus for SA, they seem to honor their lifetime warrantees.
Funny toss up, because the buying market is left to be balance the "made in china" superstitions. against "f*cked up in America" superstitions.
Sounds like it is a great base to build a USGI spec rifle off. Money isn't so much an issue for me, so I will likely follow Different's plan #3, buy an SA, shoot within specs, and upgrade over time with USGI parts if/as required.
Sources:
http://www.fulton-armory.com/M14SReview.html
http://www.imageseek.com/m1a/USGI%20and%20Chinese%20M14%20Parts%20and%20The%20American%20M14%20Owner.doc