Norinco SKS

jigger08

Regular
EE Expired
Rating - 98.8%
81   1   0
Sooooo...,a Norinco SKS type 56 should be a reliable feeding and firing gun.What type of performance can I expect?I realize they are inexpensive but for one last time,are these a dependable range and bush plinker?Not trying to flog the subject.
 
It'll probably shoot minute of deer vitals out to a couple hundred yards if you can shoot. As for reliablity it would probably survive being run over more than you would
 
Norinco

Well I'll order one and see for myself.The Yugo sounds like a marginally better made gun but at 2x the price I'll risk the Norinco.Thanks.
 
A Yugo isn't marginally better made. Its probably worth the difference. But the Norinco will be just fine.
 
Ironically the Norincos are often valued higher in the USA, because they can't bring them into the country anymore.
 
It arrived Friday from Marstar.Actually looked to be in fair shape and from 10' or more away you can hardly see the brushstrokes or errant hairs from the paint on finish.lol.Any advice on the loading,and removal of live rounds would be appreciated.Ammo should arrive this coming week and I'm anxious.
 
To load you feed it through the top of the action, just like 99% of sporting rifles out there. You can feed it off of stripper-clips which slide intot he slots on the top of the bolt carrier. Insert clip and push down with thumb until the magazine is full.

To unload pull on the tab in front of the trigger gaud to open the floor plate. Just like 90% of sporters out there. I'm confident that if you've used a commercial bolt-action rifle, loading and unloading will be second-nature to you.
 
Don't consider an SKS equilavent to a .30/30, and don't assume you can take deer with it as easily.
They might have similar ballistics, but the .30/30 dwarves the SKS in the real world, it's just that 99% of .30/30 ammunition uses a much different bullet which allows it to be compared to the SKS so often..
 
^ I was under the impression that 7.62x39mm was a slightly superior cartridge because the pointed bullets have better BC versus the flat-nose 30-30 bullets? When would a 30-30 use a "better" bullet than a typical 7.62x39 bullet?
 
Damn this search engine sucks!
Took me a while to find this...

For Reference, with another brush gun...
30/30 with 125 grain bullet.
Velocity
2570 fps @ the muzzle
2090 fps @ 100 yards
1660 fps @ 200 yards
1320 fps @ 300 yards
1080 fps @ 400 yards

Energy
1830 ft/lbs @ the muzzle
1210 ft/lbs @ 100 yards
770 ft/lbs @ 200 yards
480 ft/lbs @ 300 yards
320 ft/lbs @ 400 yards

Traj (inches)
-2.0 @ 100 yards
-2.6 @ 200 yards
-19.9 @ 300 yards
0.0 @ 400 yards

7.62x39 Russian 123/125 grain Bullet
Velocity
2300 fps @ muzzle
2030 fps @ 100 yards
1780 fps @ 200 yards
1550 fps @ 300 yards
1350 fps @ 400 yards

Energy
1445 ft/lbs @ the muzzle
1125 ft/lbs @ 100 yards
860 ft/lbs @ 200 yards
655 ft/lbs @ 300 yards
500 ft/lbs @ 400 yards

Traj (inches)
+2.5 @ 100 yards
-2.0 @ 200 yards
-17.5 @ 300 yards
0.0 @ 400 yards

Source: Gun Digest 2006 page 233.

Each rifle is no better or worse then the other one.
For hunting I'd pack my 30/30, as it is a lighter, and less complicated rifle.
 
Last edited:
From what I recall, the X39 milsurp round bullet,which is FMJ anyways, is around 127 grain. Most 3030 is 150 and up. I guess you could find a hunting round
 
Back
Top Bottom