Outfitter facing Wildlife Act charges

Thomas D'Arcy McGee

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Outfitter facing Wildlife Act charges

It is alleged archery-only hunting licences used out of season

Red Deer Advocate

Paul Cowley / Mar. 20, 2018 5:00 p.m.

A Cardston outfitter is facing more than 30 charges, mostly under the Wildlife Act and in relation to out-of-season-hunting allegations.

A trial began in Red Deer provincial court on Tuesday for Richard “Todd” Bunnage, owner of Rugged Outfitting, who is facing charges related to the 2015 hunting season in the West Country west of Rocky Mountain House.

Crown prosecutor Peter Roginski alleged that Bunnage used archery-only hunting licences outside of that season. At least one licence was purchased the day after the season closed on Sept. 23.

It also alleged that Bunnage led hunting outside the Wildlife Management Unit where the licence applied.

Rugged Outfitting routinely guides hunters from outside Canada, who are known as non-resident aliens in hunting regulations.

The first day of the trial mostly featured testimony from Alberta Environment and Parks experts on the province’s complicated hunting regulations, which are applied to nearly 180 Wildlife Management Units.

Depending on the animal, Alberta has two or three hunting seasons and a wide variety of licences are available for each of the wildlife units and are subject to a variety of seasonal or weapon restrictions.

Defence lawyer Richard Fritze closely questioned the government witnesses as to why the government’s system allowed an archery-only licence to be purchased when the season had already closed.

Stuart Nadeau, an Alberta Environment and Parks data management staffer, said because of the complexity of hunting regulations, which can vary between wildlife units, the licence-issuing system does not track hunting seasons.

“The system does not enforce date regulations,” said Nadeau. Big game licences are sold from Aug. 1 to Dec. 1.

If a hunter makes a mistake and buys an expired licence they can get their money back from the vendor within 12 hours. After that, they have to go to a fish and wildlife office to fill out some paperwork and return the licence and tag.

Nadeau said the province issues hunting regulations before each season, which lists all of the licences and seasons. Outfitters and guides have access to information through the Alberta Professional Outfitters Association, which represents nearly 2,000 guide-outfitters and guides.

Fritze questioned why licences do not have the season printed on them.

The court heard an archery-only licence has that printed on it but season dates are not included.

The trial continues on Wednesday.
 
Interesting from a legal perspective. Although arguable the clients were relying on the outfitter's expertise to be guided within the law, they wouldn't necessarily be absolved of contravening the laws. Subject to extradition and then ordered to stand trial? Then civil actions under tort law to follow? Yikes. :eek:
 
Interesting from a legal perspective. Although arguable the clients were relying on the outfitter's expertise to be guided within the law, they wouldn't necessarily be absolved of contravening the laws. Subject to extradition and then ordered to stand trial? Then civil actions under tort law to follow? Yikes. :eek:

You can't be extradited to Canada for a wildlife offence.
 
It doesn’t make him any less culpable but also consider the very real possibility he was incompetent. Anyone know the seasons there, and if a GOS / rifle follows bow? There are some long elk seasons in that region.

"At least one licence was purchased the day after the season closed."

Could it be that the vendor was in on the "action"?

The minimum wage employee at home hardware doesn’t know the seasons and isn’t required to, the hunter is.
 
Hard to buy that level of incompetence, especially when you are booking clients well ahead of time for specific hunts. Buying a license the very day the season closed sounds a lot like tagging after the fact, would be interesting to know if those tags went on an animal.
 
Extradition from the US to Canada -

https://internationalextraditionblo...da-extradition-treaty-with-the-united-states/

ARTICLE 2

(1) Persons shall be delivered up according to the provisions of this Treaty for any of the offenses listed in the Schedule annexed to this Treaty, which is an integral part of this Treaty, provided these offenses are punishable by the laws of both Contracting Parties by a term of imprisonment exceeding one year.

SCHEDULE

1. Murder; assault with intent to commit murder.

.
.
.

A Deer was murdered or the intent thereof, no? :eek:
 
Last edited:
An indirect extradition process. Otherwise they will continue to be cross-border fugitives, arrest warrants would be issued. Arrested if they ever attempted to enter Canada at a border crossing. A lot of trouble over this. Worth it??
 
Back
Top Bottom