No such thing as a P-17 Enfield. I think you are looking for a part for a M17
The book 'Introduction to Modern Gunsmithing" by Harold MacFarland has detailed instructions for forging the P14/M1917 trigger guard flat. No cutting and welding required. They can be found on pages 117 - 121. The book has an entire section on customizing those actions.
Yes if you want to use original hole spacing then cutting & welding is the correct option . Cutting and welding is an easy job if you have an angle grinder and a welder avail. I have used a 400 amp Hobart that could be set low enough or a 130 amp buzz box that would handle a 1/32 rod easily.
Build a "hole spacing "jig (can be wood if a one off) Weld up with a bit of excess deposit, grind some off & then file to contour, finish with 600 grit emory cloth.
I do not have that book - thanks for reference - from my one-time-doing of that job, I would be concerned that forging might allow the action screw hole spacing to change, if that front tongue allowed to move forward. Those rifles not like Mauser - front screw is 90 degrees to bore line - rear screw is tilted - screw head is forward - so perhaps 85 degrees to bore line. I found in 1950's book by Roy Dunlop, was a thing to re-drill, re-tap that rear action screw hole in the receiver so that it was 90 degrees to bore line - I think he used a floor plate from 1903 Springfield rifle, at that point - was already flat. I presume that was less fuss for him to do and parts were readily available when and where he was. I had spare military goose neck one - with tools, etc. that I had on hand, seemed that cut and re-weld and grind was the thing to do. Is good to hear there might be another way to get it done.
Yes if you want to use original hole spacing then cutting & welding is the correct option . Cutting and welding is an easy job if you have an angle grinder and a welder avail. I have used a 400 amp Hobart that could be set low enough or a 130 amp buzz box that would handle a 1/32 rod easily
You use a jig that holds the screw spacing. When I did it, it did make a jig, but I cut and welded instead. - danI do not have that book - thanks for reference - from my one-time-doing of that job, I would be concerned that forging might allow the action screw hole spacing to change, if that front tongue allowed to move forward. Those rifles not like Mauser - front screw is 90 degrees to bore line - rear screw is tilted - screw head is forward - so perhaps 85 degrees to bore line. I found in 1950's book by Roy Dunlop, was a thing to re-drill, re-tap that rear action screw hole in the receiver so that it was 90 degrees to bore line - I think he used a floor plate from 1903 Springfield rifle, at that point - was already flat. I presume that was less fuss for him to do and parts were readily available when and where he was. I had spare military goose neck one - with tools, etc. that I had on hand, seemed that cut and re-weld and grind was the thing to do. Is good to hear there might be another way to get it done.