Powder Coated 9mm Semi-Wadcutters for IPSC?

hayday

Regular
Rating - 100%
116   0   1
Location
Eastern Ontario
I'm thinking of casting up some .357 diameter semi-wadcutters, powder coating them and then resizing them to 9mm and loading them in 9X19 cases for shooting in IPSC events from my double stack, 9x19 Para Ordnance LDA (which can handle 9mm rounds exceeding the normal 9X19 OAL).

As noted, I'd resize the powder coated bullets to .355"

I would seat the semi-wadcutters so that a good bit projects out of the case mouth.

Why? For fun. BUT wouldn't such ammo give real clarity as to whether you broke/ touched a line on the target or not?

Has anybody already done this?

What do you think?

101_1351new.jpg
 
Last edited:
I'm going to play around with seating depth to get the OAL right for my gun. Otherwise, the powder coating (hard, high temperature polymer coating covering the entire bullet) should help a lot.

powder coating.jpg


Ordinary lead bullets would be a non starter IMO.
 
Last edited:
Yes but the nice sharp edges of a SWC hole might be cool. At my club we shoot lots of informal club-level, weekly matches based on ISPC rules - but it is rare that we have an overlay handy.
 
Also you'd be able to see the clean bullet holes from a good distance away, so you won't waste time filing in on shots that were there. I say go for it. I'd love a 125gn coated SWC in 9mm (.355-356"), but it seems it's not commercially viable, and I'm not about to start casting again.
 
It's probably not heavy enough for what your wanting but i have sized and loaded lee's 105gr SWC bullets in my 9mm. I haven't done alot but they seem to feed 99% of the time in my glock 17 (factory) and 80% of the time in my norc 1911. these were traditional lube but i have 50 loaded up that have been powder coated to test out.

2013-12-10174301_zps086bd002.jpg
 
Wow, great point. I often waste an extra shot because I can't tell for sure that I nailed a target from a distance. Clean clear holes could make a big difference.

I'll probably go with a 158 grain SWC pushed by some powder that doesn't need a lot of case volume (titegroup?)

Remember that the box double stack mag on my 9mm Para Ordnance LDA can handle OALs as long as 38 super/ 45 acp - so I can deal with limited case volumes by hanging the SWC shoulder out a pretty good distance in the case mouth (see the top photo for an example). I will not be aligning the shoulder of the SWC with the case neck - as shown by one of the posters (Spawn-Inc ).

As for the weight of of the 158 gr., I think this bullet will stabilize alright - as it is really the length of the boolit that matters - and a 158 gr swc is probably shorter than a 147 gr 9mm jacketed bullet. Obviously, this would also get you to a major 9 pretty easily - since the power factor formula gives a special advantage to heavier bullets.

Oh yah, and in case you haven't tried it, powder coating cast bullets is fun and easy (once you are set up) unlike shooting lubricated lead you don't get a damn stinky cloud of blue smoke in your face everytime you touch off a round.

Just be careful that you don't breath in the power coating material dust. It can cause problems that make you want to talk and talk and talk - like this old guy in this 17-18 minute long video (LINK BELOW)



BTW I have a better way than this old f**t

Also you'd be able to see the clean bullet holes from a good distance away, so you won't waste time filing in on shots that were there. I say go for it. I'd love a 125gn coated SWC in 9mm (.355-356"), but it seems it's not commercially viable, and I'm not about to start casting again.
 
Last edited:
I like your idea Hayday. I think the lighter than 158's would work better. Powder coating them really gives them an edge over straight lead & even hard lead. Plus if done right, the bases get coated too, decreasing smoke.
I would not size to .355, as .356 is the ideal diameter for 9mm. Cast your desired bullet, powder coat, and size to .356.
 
I was shooting a match locally, one of the guys was using trunacated cone 135's they left the nicest bullet holes ever. A perfect circle grease ring.
 
If you are concerned about scoring lines and overlays. Shoot a 45 with SWCs.

Good point but I don't have a 45 and actually don't like that particular round. Just a personal thing.

45 ACP wasn't John Browning's first choice for the 1911 either. The American army forced him to change the original chambering for the 1911 (or, in fact, the 1911's predecessor) from Browning's preferred cartridge - 38 auto (an early less powerful version of what would become 38 Super Auto) - because the American army wrongly doubted the potential of a .355-.357 bullet.

To me 45 ACP is sort of a fat, ugly, slow moving thing - somewhat like the metallic cartridge equivalent of Family Guy's Peter Griffin.

family guy 45acp.png
 
Last edited:
Other than potential feeding issues (which can be resolved with OAL, etc) the only issue I see is the resizing from .358 to .355 or .356. I see the cost effectiveness of already having the moulds so purchasing some new one's wouldn't make sense.
So long as they were accurate after the resizing, having a 158gr 9mm bullet would be quite low recoil to make minor power factor in IPSC. I know of one guy who shoots 160 grain 9mm and it's funny how flat his pistol is, it's like shooting a .22. The only problem at distance due to the low fps is accuracy. It almost looks like the bullets are being lobbed into the paper at distance (+25 yards).
 
I would have a real concern about feeding problems with 9mm SWC rounds in a semi-auto.

I shot them in my fns feed just fine.

To the op I would slug your barrel and then size to that. I size mine to 357 a buddy of mine with a m&p needs his at 358


Other than potential feeding issues (which can be resolved with OAL, etc) the only issue I see is the resizing from .358 to .355 or .356. I see the cost effectiveness of already having the moulds so purchasing some new one's wouldn't make sense.
So long as they were accurate after the resizing, having a 158gr 9mm bullet would be quite low recoil to make minor power factor in IPSC. I know of one guy who shoots 160 grain 9mm and it's funny how flat his pistol is, it's like shooting a .22. The only problem at distance due to the low fps is accuracy. It almost looks like the bullets are being lobbed into the paper at distance (+25 yards).


I shot some of the hytech coated ammo from x reload and their 124's were going 800-900 fps. My powder coated 130-135's are going over 1100 and have had them to over 1300fps. No idea why they load them so light.
 
Sorry to go ot here but would you mind giving a brief description on how you pc your bullets?

I haven’t looked at the video for awhile but, compared to the old guy’s approach {LINK}, I talk a lot less and use a mask (because if you breath in the dust, it is in there for good). Also, I use plastic bottles for the tumbling part (containing the clean lead bullets and the powder material) – forget his nonsense with bags and cheap snap lid boxes.

I use white translucent bottles with screw caps that I got from a surplus outfit. I think that these bottles were originally sold by a scientific supply company.

Getting the right type of plastic bottles is important - as some types of plastics (such as the hard clear stuff) may not generate the right amount of static. Further, I imagine that glass bottles and metal cans etc. wouldn’t work.

I got a size of bottle that allows three such bottles to fit in my Lyman tumbler (800ML?).

The powder coat material you get from Princess Auto is great and cheap. The red looks coolest but the black seems to coat more consistently.

If you want to powder coat cast bullets that were previously lubed, clean the (damn) lube off in a bath of diluted Lloyds XTREME clean degreaser.

After tumbling (for 8 minutes or more) pour the bottles out through an open mesh basket and a big funnel - so that the recovered power goes back into a recovery bottle (wear a mask).

Use a basket that has as open a mesh as possible without allowing your bullets to fall through and one as big as possible that still fits the biggest toaster oven you can use. Bake in a toaster oven that you won’t use for food, and do it outside. Bullets will get shiny in about 6-8 minutes at 450F. Obviously have heat resistant gloves handy for when stuff has to come out.

Don’t let bullets contact each other as they cool. Pour then into a bucket of water to hot quench - or spread them on a clean surface to cool - so that they don’t touch.

Resize the finished bullets in a Lee push through bullet sizer without any lube.
 
I use the 147gr Campro's. They are round nosed with a flat point and leave a fairly clean hole. I use the Campro 124gr HP's too and find they leave a cleaner hole then the 124gr RN.
 
Hey Hayday, the Army did not force JMB to abandon his (as it turned out) anemic 38ACP cartridge. The Army RFP was for a 45 caliber round. The Army requested a minimum of 45 caliber ( like the 45 Colt) and the cartridge was adopted into the 1910 pistol.
JMB did not invent the 45acp cartridge, but adapted it to his design.
 
Hey Hayday, the Army did not force JMB to abandon his (as it turned out) anemic 38ACP cartridge. The Army RFP was for a 45 caliber round. The Army requested a minimum of 45 caliber ( like the 45 Colt) and the cartridge was adopted into the 1910 pistol.
JMB did not invent the 45acp cartridge, but adapted it to his design.

Here’s a friendly tip for any of you good folks out there who haven’t tried power coating (“PC”) their cast boolits yet. Be a cheap guy (like me) don’t overspend on your PC work.

I had a PMer message me as follows ”recently found a convection toaster oven that I will use for pc in the future. Plan on hooking it up to a pid temperature controller for the best consistency possible.” I mentioned to him that I use an otherwise unloved big toaster oven - that I got at Value Village for 10 or 15 bucks. Same story for a friend of mine. Works great and my wife can’t rag at me for spending 10 buck (or if she does, I can ignore her, without issues).

PC powders (like what you buy CHEAP from my second home - Princess Auto), REALLLY, REALLY, REALLY don’t care about such niceties. Just cook the PC boolits at 450F or so until they get shiny (say 6-8 minutes).

Less is more baby. Why spend big money when $10 bucks will do the same job. Just give me the difference for that tip.

BTW to that other guy who said “JMB did not invent the 45acp cartridge, but adapted it to his design.” Hey help me out here. Where the heck did you get the idea that I said that JMB invented 45 ACP? You might want to bone up on your reading skills a bit there. Actually, there is a piece on the web that tell the story about who “invented” 45 ACP and why (sort of) - see this LINK.

IF JMB had invented 45 ACP, I doubt it would be such a poor design.

Instead, however, some military procurement lackies, in 1904-06, set the bar really low for this new round by specifying that it should match (but, notably, not exceed) the ballistic "performance" of a cartridge which was already technologically out-of-date (in 1904); the black powder-era round 45 Long Colt and its immediate relatives (“available .45 caliber revolver rounds of good fame”).

The efforts of Frankford Arsenal - as well as the civilian Industry (notably Winchester) - resulted in the creation of 45 ACP (see LINK) and JMB and other firearms designers were forced to rework existing pistol designs to accommodate this obese, low pressure round.

Low pressure you say? Yup. Since all the military procurement guys specified was that this “new” round match 45 long Colt “performance”, the round was designed to operate at a lousy 19,900 – 22,000 Copper units of pressure (CUP). In contrast, current day cartridges using modern nitrocellulose powders generating higher pressure can produce a CUP in the 28,000 – 39,000 range.

family guy 45acp v2.png


Given these low-pressure specs, people cheaped-out and correspondingly under-designed 45 ACP brass - so that the case wall is thin, and there is hardly any “web” where the cases wall meets the case base.

Making JMB’s earlier pistol designed feed this fatso, required that the feed ramp be modified to allow the fatter round to get into the chamber in the same length of stroke as was otherwise used for the former intended round - 38 ACP. Too bad.

The combination of thin case walls near the case base and the 1911’s necessary unsupported feed ramp (in its common 45 ACP configuration) meant that feed ramp blow-outs come about easily even with really low operating pressures – a problem which persists to today

No, JMB didn’t design 45 ACP. Others deserve the blame for that. He just had to incorporate it into his existing designs to accommodate US military procurement guys who were living in the past (in 1906). This, I believe, is something we agree on.
 
Last edited:
I like your idea Hayday. I think the lighter than 158's would work better. Powder coating them really gives them an edge over straight lead & even hard lead. Plus if done right, the bases get coated too, decreasing smoke.
I would not size to .355, as .356 is the ideal diameter for 9mm. Cast your desired bullet, powder coat, and size to .356.

Here is a collection of photos showing the process:

assembly 1.jpg


I used red PC material so that the results would show up better. As noted, you get a nicer finish with the Princess auto black.

The boolits weigh 159 grains. they are resized to .355 and the rounds feed in a standard length 9mm box mag.

No issues about being able to fit in a powder charge.

assembly 2.jpg


Can anybody suggest a starting load for Titegroup? I haven't shot these yet
 
Back
Top Bottom