Primary Arms optics?

SwifTst

Regular
Rating - 97%
32   1   0
Location
Port Perry
Alright so I have a sweet 700 coming from a fellow cgner and I'm trying to decide on optics. I'm looking at this one https://ctcsupplies.ca/collections/primary-arms/products/primary-arms-4-14x44mm-riflescope-acss-hud-dmr-308-reticle

Or the non illuminated one with a mildot reticle. But truth is I know nothing about these scopes. I was going to just go with a leupold vx but I kind of want one of these so I can learn how to use the turrets for doping.

So does anyone have any experience with these optics? I really like the idea of the primary arms but at the same time I want something durable that'll last like the vx2.

Decisions decisions. .. any input and recommendations are welcome. I'm on a strict budget so 5 -600 is my budget for now

Cheers
 
I have the ACSS hud dmr reticle on my 308 and I really like it. I can only shoot out to 700 yards and it is very good at that range. The wind aiming points are right on the money. I also have the 4x 7.62/300 blk scope and for the money they are hard to beat.
 
I have the 3x prism scope with the 556 ACSS recticle. The glass is unexpectedly clear. The illumination works as well.
 
Hmm good to know. I might just have to take a serious look at primary arms. Do they feel well built and sturdy?

They seem very well built and if you watch some of the videos you will see they are tough scopes. I have a $1200 Vortex scope and I prefer to use the Primary Arms (mainly because of the reticle). I will be buying the R-grid when it comes in. Buy one and I dont think you will be sorry.
 
I have a 3x prism for my x39 AR. Glass is very clear and it seems very solid. They have a great reputation in the States, and I think it's well-deserved based upon the little time I have used mine.

Big thanks to CTCS for bringing them in!
 
Primary Arms Scope First Impressions

So as it currently stands, I have 3 PA scopes. The fixed 4x prism in 7.62x39 and the 1-6x in 5.56 and the .308 4-14x.

These are still very new to me, so be sure to check back later this summer as I get more use out of them.

I have only put rounds through the fixed 4x (approximately 100 and only out to 50 and 100 yards) and no rounds through the 1-6x.

I have found (so far) that both scopes roughly share the same pros and cons. Please bear in mind that I am not an expert shooter or even a good shooter at that. While I can say what glass I like/don't like based on what I've tried, I don't know even about the subject to give you a technical assessment. So take everything I say with a grain of salt.

With regards to the scopes, I am seriously impressed with the glass clarity given their price point. I had no trouble seeing my spent shotgun shells at 50 yards and they appears VERY crisp. I had no issue pegging the shells at that range or getting clover groups. Siting in was pretty easy. While I did not shoot the 4x at 100 yards, I did look down the line and everything stood out really nicely.

That glass is better than the vortex Diamondback line and equal to, or possibly better than, the vortex strike eagle. It is rumoured that the strike eagle is made in the same factory as the PA 1-6x. I have not been able to do any true side by sides as of yet because of the weather here.

Both scopes have an amazing reticle and I am hoping to test it out at my range later this year once construction starts on expanding the range from 200 to 600 yards.

Also, both scopes seem to have comparable glass, which is nice.

This is the only positive I can offer at this point in time as I don't know about durability or longevity. That being said, all the reviews I have watched/read (and it has been a lot) have said nothing but good things about it. AKOperators Union (check their YouTube) literally bashed the 4x prism scope out of a block of ice and then mounted it to a gun and based it again and it still held true. Sootch has the 1-6x and loves it. He has a good review as well.

In terms of negatives, they both have the same as I can tell so far.

I really dislike the eye box.

If you don't have a perfect cheek weld it is very easy to lose the the sight picture and black out the reticle. Compared to the Accupoint, this was a surprise to me and definitely something that I don't like. That being said, it is fixed easily through training and learning to maintain a good/proper cheek weld.

Given the price point, I can't complain too much and it makes up for this with nice glass and an awesome (albeit useless for Civillian application) reticle. I was also not of the eye relief on each scope, but I was admittedly spoiled given the constant 3.2" on my Accupoint. Spec-wise, both scopes have good eye relief.

I also am not a fan of the illumination.

While technically daylight bright in that I can see the illumination, I don't find that it really is all that bright and does wash out on bright days. Granted, the etched reticle will serve you better during day shooting and the illumination is more (emphasis on more) than ideal for low light and CQB applications.

The Accupoint has the opposite problem, being great for outdoor use, but poor for indoor. It also has the secondary issue of reticle bloom, whereby one might NOT want to have the reticle illuminated and just focus on the etched triangle tip for ultra precise shots; so it cuts both ways in my honest opinion.

The other negative are the scope adjustments.

They do feel mushy and cheap but given the BDC, they are more of a set it and forget it. I did not have any issues sighting the reticle in and getting it to print clover groups at 50 yards (the 7.62 scope requires a 50-yard zero).

Lastly, I don't like the mount that came with the 4x prism. Fortunately I replaced it with a sweet Bobro mount (my preferred mount brand) as the prism scope uses ACOG bases. In this case, it's more of a positive to me as I think that was a smart choice for PA to make them compatible with th ACOG mounts.

Side note here: I don't like the fact that I can't get a metal throw lever for the 1-6. It does have a mini-cat tail that are so popular now, but I do wish it had a metal option. Perhaps in the future their will be one. Once I get that scope mounted on my custom RECCE (still waiting for the receiver to come in before I finish that build), I'll be curious to see how easy it is to adjust the magnification.

I wouldn't trust any of these yet as a "go-to-war option" and I can fully admit that Trijcon and other such brands still remain king, but something about the quality and features and price point of these optics make me smile.

So to recap, I like their glass clarity and reticle. Realistically, these two carry more weight than their negatives (depending on your point of view):

Poor eye box (though recently, I have noticed that once you get used to proper head placement, it's basically a non-issue)

Sub-par daylight bright illumination (check out sootch's video of the scope on YouTube)

Mushy adjustments

Please don't take this review as a negative. I am a huge PA fan and have 3 of their optics and plan to buy more for future projects. I'm just of the opinion that to truly get a feel for a product through Internet review, to be open and honest about the negatives.

As it stands the third scope I bought from them was their 4-14 .308 model and I must say its a fantastic scope for the money.
 
Last edited:
Primary Arms Scope First Impressions

So as it currently stands, I have 2 PA scopes. The fixed 4x prism in 7.62x39 and the 1-6x in 5.56.

These are still very new to me, so be sure to check back later this summer as I get more use out of them.

I have only put rounds through the fixed 4x (approximately 100 and only out to 50 and 100 yards) and no rounds through the 1-6x.

I have found (so far) that both scopes roughly share the same pros and cons. Please bear in mind that I am not an expert shooter or even a good shooter at that. While I can say what glass I like/don't like based on what I've tried, I don't know even about the subject to give you a technical assessment. So take everything I say with a grain of salt.

With regards to the scopes, I am seriously impressed with the glass clarity given their price point. I had no trouble seeing my spent shotgun shells at 50 yards and they appears VERY crisp. I had no issue pegging the shells at that range or getting clover groups. Siting in was pretty easy. While I did not shoot the 4x at 100 yards, I did look down the line and everything stood out really nicely.

That glass is better than the vortex Diamondback line and equal to, or possibly better than, the vortex strike eagle. It is rumoured that the strike eagle is made in the same factory as the PA 1-6x. I have not been able to do any true side by sides as of yet because of the weather here.

Both scopes have an amazing reticle and I am hoping to test it out at my range later this year once construction starts on expanding the range from 200 to 600 yards.

Also, both scopes seem to have comparable glass, which is nice.

This is the only positive I can offer at this point in time as I don't know about durability or longevity. That being said, all the reviews I have watched/read (and it has been a lot) have said nothing but good things about it. AKOperators Union (check their YouTube) literally bashed the 4x prism scope out of a block of ice and then mounted it to a gun and based it again and it still held true. Sootch has the 1-6x and loves it. He has a good review as well.

In terms of negatives, they both have the same as I can tell so far.

I really dislike the eye box.

If you don't have a perfect cheek weld it is very easy to lose the the sight picture and black out the reticle. Compared to the Accupoint, this was a surprise to me and definitely something that I don't like. That being said, it is fixed easily through training and learning to maintain a good/proper cheek weld.

Given the price point, I can't complain too much and it makes up for this with nice glass and an awesome (albeit useless for Civillian application) reticle. I was also not of the eye relief on each scope, but I was admittedly spoiled given the constant 3.2" on my Accupoint. Spec-wise, both scopes have good eye relief.

I also am not a fan of the illumination.

While technically daylight bright in that I can see the illumination, I don't find that it really is all that bright and does wash out on bright days. Granted, the etched reticle will serve you better during day shooting and the illumination is more (emphasis on more) than ideal for low light and CQB applications.

The Accupoint has the opposite problem, being great for outdoor use, but poor for indoor. It also has the secondary issue of reticle bloom, whereby one might NOT want to have the reticle illuminated and just focus on the etched triangle tip for ultra precise shots; so it cuts both ways in my honest opinion.

The other negative are the scope adjustments.

They do feel mushy and cheap but given the BDC, they are more of a set it and forget it. I did not have any issues sighting the reticle in and getting it to print clover groups at 50 yards (the 7.62 scope requires a 50-yard zero).

Lastly, I don't like the mount that came with the 4x prism. Fortunately I replaced it with a sweet Bobro mount (my preferred mount brand) as the prism scope uses ACOG bases. In this case, it's more of a positive to me as I think that was a smart choice for PA to make them compatible with th ACOG mounts.

Side note here: I don't like the fact that I can't get a metal throw lever for the 1-6. It does have a mini-cat tail that are so popular now, but I do wish it had a metal option. Perhaps in the future their will be one. Once I get that scope mounted on my custom RECCE (still waiting for the receiver to come in before I finish that build), I'll be curious to see how easy it is to adjust the magnification.

I wouldn't trust any of these yet as a "go-to-war option" and I can fully admit that Trijcon and other such brands still remain king, but something about the quality and features and price point of these optics make me smile.

So to recap, I like their glass clarity and reticle. Realistically, these two carry more weight than their negatives (depending on your point of view):

Poor eye box (though recently, I have noticed that once you get used to proper head placement, it's basically a non-issue)

Sub-par daylight bright illumination (check out sootch's video of the scope on YouTube)

Mushy adjustments

Please don't take this review as a negative. I am a huge PA fan and have 3 of their optics and plan to buy more for future projects. I'm just of the opinion that to truly get a feel for a product through Internet review, to be open and honest about the negatives.

As it stands the third scope I bought from them was their 4-14 .308 model and I must say its a fantastic scope for the money.

Great review! Cheers
 
Thank you very much :), what scope mount is best for a M&P10? I am thinking of the Buris Pepr.


QUOTE=Donster 125;12699345]Without a doubt PA!

Their 4-14 .308 would make a great DMR scope. However, if you want more of a RECCE feel, their 1-6x would make a good option too![/QUOTE]
 
Thank you very much :), what scope mount is best for a M&P10? I am thinking of the Buris Pepr.


QUOTE=Donster 125;12699345]Without a doubt PA!

Their 4-14 .308 would make a great DMR scope. However, if you want more of a RECCE feel, their 1-6x would make a good option too!
[/QUOTE]

I am biased, but I love Bobro mounts. If the scope you mentione is a 30mm tube, then this is the mount I'd recommend. It was designed with the AR platform in mind:

CM-403.jpg


http://www.theammosource.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=222_223&products_id=1466

I know it seems counter productive to use a scope mount that costs almost as much as the scope... I don't really have a good reason for that other than that back when I was into higher-end optics, I wanted an easy to use, effective, higher-end mount.

The optic snob in me has faded, but the optic mount snob has not. Oh well...
 
Just got my first PA, prism x5.

Out of the box impressions: eye-box is abysmal and reticle is slightly tilted to the left. Not sure if it's a feature or a defect. I'll try getting some photos later.

Search on internet gave Ar15.com post with the same question from 2013 on x3 prism sight, PA rep ignored it.

"The optic is mounted. I've stood the rifle up and eyeballed at and it does look a little crooked, and when I pull it up to look through the optic the reticle is rotated left a little bit. Like i said though, I haven't shot it yet so i can't so for sure it'll be a problem. I've found i could just rotate the rifle to the right just a little bit to straighten it out. weird i know. "

Must be a defect then?
 
Just got my first PA, prism x5.

Out of the box impressions: eye-box is abysmal and reticle is slightly tilted to the left. Not sure if it's a feature or a defect. I'll try getting some photos later.

Search on internet gave Ar15.com post with the same question from 2013 on x3 prism sight, PA rep ignored it.

"The optic is mounted. I've stood the rifle up and eyeballed at and it does look a little crooked, and when I pull it up to look through the optic the reticle is rotated left a little bit. Like i said though, I haven't shot it yet so i can't so for sure it'll be a problem. I've found i could just rotate the rifle to the right just a little bit to straighten it out. weird i know. "

Must be a defect then?

Sounds like a defect. Don't expect An answer right away on AR.15

Go through CTCS to deal with the warranty. I've read of people getting lemons out of the box. Don't sweat it. It will be fixed. PA makes great optics for the money.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom