PRS Tripods

The RRS is the gold standard, especially if it's for use in rough environments.

Leofotos are okay, but don't stand up to abuse well. Lots of people struggled with their Leofotos and other similar tripods in some recent field matches. People literally having to take their tripod legs apart in order to make them operational again. No issues with RRS tripods.

If you can afford it and you are planning on using your tripod in the field, the RRS is the way to go. Cheaper than buying a Leofoto and then buying an RRS when your Leofoto proves to be unreliable - I know a few people doing just that.

Cheap, light, strong - pick 2 of the 3. If you are on a budget, make sure to get a tripod with the heaviest weight rating possible - heavier weight rating will generally be more stable. If it's cheap, it won't be light. If you want it to be light, pony up and get a good quality carbon fiber one so it's also strong. A wobbly tripod is not fun to shoot off of. Center columns are generally not necessary for shooting and will also be less stable than a tripod without a center column, all else equal, as the center of gravity will be higher.

ARCA is a great mounting system, just keep in mind that there is no set standard for ARCA. A direct mounting system, such as ARCA, will be more stable than something like a hog saddle. Most firearm related ARCA mounts are made to the RRS standard. Ballheads will give you more options than a panning head, but are generally a bit less stable. A ballhead would probably be more suitable for shooting in places with big elevation changes, such as mountains, where may have to shoot at some extreme angles. If you are shooting on mostly flat ground, panning heads (like RRS Anvil) are the ticket. Again, get a head with a high weight rating for more stability.

I found a good deal on an RRS, and pulled the trigger on that. Spent a little more than what one would spend on a Leofoto, and got a better quality product. For a head I am using a Uniqball UBH45 gimbal ball head system, though if I was to do it over again I would strongly consider the RRS Anvil head. The gimbal capabilities of the Uniqball head is pretty badass though.
 
Last edited:
When it comes to weight rating, sure more is better, but is there a practical or usable minimum? Would something with a 30 or 40lb rating be sufficient or is more like 50+ lbs the ticket?
 
The RRS is the gold standard, especially if it's for use in rough environments.

Leofotos are okay, but don't stand up to abuse well. Lots of people struggled with their Leofotos and other similar tripods in some recent field matches. People literally having to take their tripod legs apart in order to make them operational again. No issues with RRS tripods.

If you can afford it and you are planning on using your tripod in the field, the RRS is the way to go. Cheaper than buying a Leofoto and then buying an RRS when your Leofoto proves to be unreliable - I know a few people doing just that.

Cheap, light, strong - pick 2 of the 3. If you are on a budget, make sure to get a tripod with the heaviest weight rating possible - heavier weight rating will generally be more stable. If it's cheap, it won't be light. If you want it to be light, pony up and get a good quality carbon fiber one so it's also strong. A wobbly tripod is not fun to shoot off of. Center columns are generally not necessary for shooting and will also be less stable than a tripod without a center column, all else equal, as the center of gravity will be higher.

ARCA is a great mounting system, just keep in mind that there is no set standard for ARCA. A direct mounting system, such as ARCA, will be more stable than something like a hog saddle. Most firearm related ARCA mounts are made to the RRS standard. Ballheads will give you more options than a panning head, but are generally a bit less stable. A ballhead would probably be more suitable for shooting in places with big elevation changes, such as mountains, where may have to shoot at some extreme angles. If you are shooting on mostly flat ground, panning heads (like RRS Anvil) are the ticket. Again, get a head with a high weight rating for more stability.

I found a good deal on an RRS, and pulled the trigger on that. Spent a little more than what one would spend on a Leofoto, and got a better quality product. For a head I am using a Uniqball UBH45 gimbal ball head system, though if I was to do it over again I would strongly consider the RRS Anvil head. The gimbal capabilities of the Uniqball head is pretty badass though.

Sage words here. I've been through 3 iterations of tripods now. Started with a Slim D700, then a PRST and now Leofoto 404C that will soon be replaced by a RRS TFC-34. I've run the Leofoto since just before the Snipershide Cup this year as my PRST developed another problem (worn out roll pin) that although solved under warranty, was enough to push me to go in a different direction as I had some other issues with the PRST such as legs pulling out entirely (also rectified by warranty). The Leofoto performed well in match use although it was never really used in inclement weather (lucky, I guess). I shot the Gunwerks NRL match down in Wyoming this past weekend and had 2 separate failures with my Leofoto (one leg seized and another came out entirely) which cost me points since you had to set up your tripod on the clock. I saw other guys have similar issues with Leofoto as well as Feisols. No issues with RRS. They are crazy expensive and it will pain me to do so but I'll be getting one in the near future. I'd be much further ahead at this point if I had got one to begin with.

As far as heads go, I've been running an RRS Anvil-30 all season and it's fantastic, lightweight, super stable but much more articulation than a levelling base. I've yet to find an issue with it. Closing thing I have found is my partner in team matches finds it hard to use to track movers but I never notice since I ambush instead of track anyways...
 
Back
Top Bottom